On this page
-
Text (3)
-
JnafrlfitW] THE IiEAB^Tl. *»&
-
THE GREAT SECRET SOCIETY. This great con...
-
THE SERVICES OE THE AllMY. Fuesh from th...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
-^ America. Assumin G That Mr. Cka.Mpton...
getber , and , we are inclined to believe , had ^ y other member of the Government , in the jEfouee of Commons , desired to be more expHeit , it would not have been in his power . ^ 7 e do not think that the real state of mat- ters is known to the general body of the Cabinet— 'to the Duke of Akgyi / I / , or Lord Ct RjUSViijiiE , for instance . Lord CiLABENDON ' s last despatch does not appear to have had an effect , in America , favourable to the pretensions of the British Cabinet . On the contrary , the unequivocal
contradiction of Mr . Champion ' s statement by Mr . Cass , Mr . Clayton , and Mr . Maect , leaves little doubt which side of the question has been supported , in good faith , by fair avowals , and which by unworthy and unaccountable prevarications . It is very easy , and may seem very successful , to argue that the whole difficulty has been created , for election purposes , by the President and his Ministers . If the sense of the American nation be so distinctly against the policy of the Cabinet at Washington as is affirmed by Lord Cii Abend on ' s advocates , what can Mr .
Piebce expect to gain at a Presidential election ? It is easy , also , to let the real question slip through a concatenation of impertinent epithets applied to " Pierce " and " Maect ; " but the point is , whether the British Government has not endeavoured , from the beginning , to "defend a false position ; whether Mr . Cjjampton ought not to have been recalled for his rash and unjustifiable conduct ; whether we have not incited the American recognition of General " WaIiKEii by our own relations with the agents of Costa Rica ?
" We doubt whether the English public has considered the real meaning of a war with the United States . It means the cessation of British trade , to the amount of nearly 30 , 000 , 000 / . ; it means a third of our factories stopped . ;—what else it means we need not say ; we all know what is the condition of England when trade ceases , when the working classes are unemployed , and when the Ministers are incorrigible , as well as incapable .
Jnafrlfitw] The Iieab^Tl. *»&
JnafrlfitW ] THE IiEAB ^ Tl . *»&
The Great Secret Society. This Great Con...
THE GREAT SECRET SOCIETY . This great conspiracy lias two centres , distinct and independent , sometimes opposed , but often working in harmony . The one has its seat at Paris , where projects and systems are devised ; the other at Vienna , the point of union for the affiliated associations of Italy and Germany . Geographically , the action of these societies mny bo traced apart , but their principles are the same , and they have recognized interests in common . It is
pretended , when any public reference is made to the secret operations of this political league , that they tend "only to counteract the influence of other occult combinations ; but their real object is to assign the entire management of continental Europe to two or three governments , to neutralize , altogether , the polioy of the secondary states , to constitute and preserve a vast uniformity of despotism . The rapid manifestations of this policy , since the close of the Russian war , attract little notice in England . But they assume
an alarming aspect when considered in connexion with the known designs of tho French and Austrian Governments . Already , in spite of tho patriotic ejaculations of Vilain Quatohze , Louis NaV'OI / icon haw forced on the Belgian Government a scheme for abridging tho liberties of tho press . An ominous reaction is visible in Sardinia , whore an active persecution is going on , not only against the Liberal journalw , but , against the freedom of religious' thought . Tho member of a Outholio congregation has just bpen
con-, ; ' . ] i < demned tj > six months' imprisonment for doubting the Immaculate Conception . The proposal of a Concordat in Tuscany , and of a Concordat in Naples , with the scheme , avowed by the Austrian official press , of a Concordat in Piedmont , spreads a gloom over Italy ; the Italians , so far from being animated with hope by the protocols of Paris , perceive that Walewski and Btjol were there the true representatives of European diplomacy .
The Austrian plan is , of course , to revive the Holy Alliance in such a deceptive form that England may be drawn into its stipulations . The Treaty of April is the first step towards thafc result . It is invariably interpreted by the Vienna press , not as establishing a particular point , but as the declaration of a European policy . It professes to guarantee the territories of the Ottoman Empire ,
upon a principle according to which the territories and authority of all governments ought to be guaranteed . Austria claims the quid pro quo . She unites with the other powers to serve their object ; they are morally , and by implication , bound to unite in serving hers . Thus Austria has gained , not a security , but an argument . But she has obtained another advantage . Her censored press is the medium of official falsifications . The
people of Lombardy and Venice , of Hungary and Transylvania , are taught ^ to believe that Great Britain and France have guaranteed the German and non-German dominions of Austria . So that our Government is made the bugbear of nations aspiring 1 to a separate political existence . Who , in the Austrian Empire , can contradict the Austrian lie ? The three Powers , it is affirmed , are agreed nowhere and never to swerve from the Conservative policy enunciated , in the name of the Triad , by the April Treaty—and that
policy is in absolute antagonism to the policy of Sardinia . So clear is the Austrian view , " indeed , that her recent negotiations with Prussia liave had the aim of drawing Prussia into an [ alliance guaranteeing the German and non - German territories of Austria . In that direction the Emperor ' s diplomatists are not likely to succeed . Prussia , in the first place , has a traditional interest in refusing the guarantee , since , if the Austrian Empire , German and non-German , were placed under the protection of the public Law of Germany , the non-German to be admitted to the
territories might claim Confederation—a policy which Prussia has always resisted . Moreover , the insecurity of Austria in her Italian , Hungarian , and Transylvanian dependencies is favourable to the German influence- of Prussia . To this it may bo added that , aa we foresaw when the Cabinet of Berlin was least popular in this country , Lord Palmerston ' s Government , in spite of its new Viennese relations , is reviving its intimacy with tho diplomatists of Prussia , and seeking to restore an influence which would always be exerted against the consolidation of the Austrian authority in
Italy . What , then , ia the position of Lord I at ,-MEHSTon ' s cabinet with respect to Italy ? By tho treaty of April tho European authority of Austria is undoubtedly strengthened . At the sumo time , the avowed policy of the British Government is favourable to Italian progress . Itsoeina to us that Lord Pai . mur revolutionafraid ot
btont , afraid of tho , Austria , jealous of France , desires to play tho one against the other , and imagines that the colluHion of tho three Powers would be \ vm dangerous than , tho collusion of two . Tho policy of England , therefore , is at bent negative ; and it may be easily understood , that while England acts as tho drag , and . France and Austria pursuo definite courses of their
mi » own , the superiority lies with them . " Wfi follow the trail , and watch , and perhaps iaa * terrupt , but Europe gains nothing from our intervention . We do nothing but repeat the hypocrisies of Tbappait and Laybaoh Meanwhile , the secret association of the French and Austrian Governments threatens to take the form of a conspiracy against all that remains of political liberty , of national independence , of religious toleration im Europe . This plot , among the most stupendous ever conceived , has the apparent
sanction of the British Cabinet , and it is the more menacing because it pretends to be based on the principles of peace , conciliation , and humanity . Suppose the military powers agreed to establish arbitration as the method of settling the disputes of Governments , what is the effect ? Nothing as regards the military Governments themselves , since they , the parties to the contract , may dissolve it at any moment . But , as regards the lesser states , it amounts to a confiscation of their political rights . Under these circumstances , what becomes of the national existence of Sardinia , of her Italian nucleus , of her army ? Her independent action is prohibited . Aid
this is the result of the war that was to set free and civilize . France and Austria undertake to manage the Old World ; England accepts an ambiguous share in the business ; Eussia and Prussia are invited to join . A suspicious facility of concession has been exhibited by the Belgian and Sardinian Governments . The French Imperial Terror , we may infer , has extorted from Belgium the flattery of surrender . But why has the scourge been restored to the Jesuits of Turin ? Why is the code of Cabaffa . resorted to by the religious reformers of Piedmont to enforce respect to the amazing farce enacted last year at the Vatican ?
What we witness now , as the sequence of the Kussian war , is the consolidation of despotism in Europe . Two vast jjarties divide the Old World—the populations and the Governments—which are more completely at enmity on every social and political ground than formerly . We , in England , believing all the time that we are the champions of the oppressed , blink at the future , and subside into repose , because gold and pearl fire , red and green lustres , and a milky way of light in the London basin saluted the Peace of Paris under our watery May moon .
The Services Oe The Allmy. Fuesh From Th...
THE SERVICES OE THE AllMY . Fuesh from the blazes and spendour of lasfc week , it would ill become the British peoplo to forget their army . Services have been rendered and they should not fade into tho misty obscurity of votes of thanks , or be lost in the effulgence of variegated fire . TheTreaty of Paris was preceded by tho deeds and endurance of tho soldiers of tho British army ; that the treaty was not moro hurtful to liussia and boneficial to Europe , that it did
not consecrate in some way tho principle ot constitutional and national freedom , is not tho fault of our soldiers . They fought and died on tho bleak plateaux of the Crimea , and in tho trenches before Sebastopol j they were prepared to carry their colours to Nicholaifift or to Warsaw ; they were as roady to do their duty iu the spring of 185 G aa in the autumn of 1854 . Tho disabled should hold a high place in the hearts of our memories , and tbo living should stand in the van of our affection
and solicitude . It is , indeed , time to rocal tho deeds that havo been accompliahed iu two short years by tho British army . They have done much , but they havo Buttered moro . It was not their fault that at tho outnet of tho war ttwy were only a " band of bravo ineu . " It w » not
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 7, 1856, page 11, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_07061856/page/11/
-