On this page
-
Text (2)
-
472 T H E rli OSL'A B B Bi. [No. 321; Sk...
-
WHICH IS WHICH? Wnicn is the Tory party ...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
France—Italy—Au Stria. The Sardinian Ple...
Italy ; the Mmiaters of Viotob Emmanuel desire tt > eoiidticV that revolution through constitutional channels , under the conviction that , if they fail ,-the revolution will pursue its own way , and convulse the entire Italian community . - Such is the position of Sardinia . : The Austrian position is the counterpart of the Sardinian . No concession , no compromise is offered from Vienna . Instead of these , a threatening attitude is assumed . ± he provinces of Central Italy , and almost the whole valley of the To , are in the occupation of Austrian armies . Prom Ferrara and
Bologna to Ancona , at the extremity of the Adriatic , a military cordon guards the smaller states , and the imperial engineers are at work , in defiance of the Treaty of Vienna , transforming Piacenza into a first-class fortress ; the garrison of Parma has overflowed into a suburban camp ; Austrian forces are deployed , from the Po to the Apennines , along the line of the Piedmontese frontier . These movements can have but one meaning . They signify that Austria is prepared to contend with Piedmont for the supremacy of the Italian peninsula .
The Sardinian Government appeals to Prance as well as to Great Britain . The French Emperor , eldest son of the Church , protector of the Pope , protege of the Jesuits , rival of Atistria in Italy , enemy of . liberalism everywhere , is not a friend of the Italian nationality . Count Cavour , who has betrayed an exaggerated deference to Bonapartism , considers the French occupation of Aneona aud of Eome a reply to the Austrian occupation of 1849 . No doubt , had the [ Roman
[ Republic remained unmolested by ± ranee , it would have been assailed by Austria ; but had not France intervened , it may be questioned whether Austria was equal to the subjugation of all Italy . As long as the Italians retained Home and Turin as citadels of the revolution , they might have held their ground against the armies of Radetzky . General Oudinot's expedition was an act of practical complicity with the aggressions of Austria . France has since asserted no interest but her own . The Eoinan States , under her protectorate , have been as basely governed as the [ Legations .
Conscious , therefore , that the policy of France in Italy has been to uphold the obnoxious government of the Pope against the rights and feelings of the nation , the Sardinian minister removes the argument from the ground of justice to that of interest . He declares , in unequivocal terms , that Austria is encroaching upon Sardinia with the design of becoming mistress of Italy . Sardinia , he adds , . exhausted and left to contend alone with her gigantic enemy , must succumb . The aid of her liberal allies is essential to her political
preservation . If such aid cannot be expected from France , it may be claimed from England , which is morally pledged to the Sardinian cause , and which , as M . Mamiani said , " must seek hereafter new friends among nations ripe for civil freedom . " " In order to bo fruitful , the policy of England must tend to assist other nations to conquer their liberty . " Not tho leaBt remarkable feature of the crisis is , that with the exception of a few impracticable men , the advanced Liberals have rallied to the Sardinian symbol . Manin , always generous and discreet , estimates at their proper value tho declarations obtained from the
British and French plenipotentiaries at Paris , and summons tho Italian national party to identify itaelf with the policy of Piedmont . It sustained in that course , ho says , Piedmont may bo impelled further , by tho will of the nation . This ia wise counsel . Nothing can bo gainod by politicians whose whole career consists in tho
rejection of actualities , and in the invention of transcendental programmes . It is , of course , true , that the Piedmontese constitution is in a state of imperfect development , that the press is under restrictions , that the police is arbitrary , that the laws still bear in parts the impress of the ancient despotism . But the cardinal evils of Italy are—Austria , the Popedom , foreign occupation ; and the only state in Itaty that labours to destroy these evils is Sardinia , which deserves , therefore , the
countenance of the liberal party . Freed from a government of priests upheld by foreign bayonets in Home , and from an Austrian army in the Legations and Duchies , the Italians might deal with their domestic grievances , and adopt whatever institutions are most conformable to their genius and to their national desires . The question is not now between Italian princes and [ Republics , but between Italy and Austria , the Church
and the people . Through the action of the late Concordat , which has delivered over the South of Germany , Hungary , and Transylvania to the supremacy of Roman priests , the clerical Jbody in Home has become , in its turn , the representative of Austrian interests . Sardinia , which resists with equal constancy the ascendancy of Austria and the ascendancy of Eome , is then the direct opponent of this usurpation , which threatens
to destroy the last relics of political independence in Italy . The national patriots , surely , will not desert their one free state , their one ffethful government . In no other direction does any hope appear ; unless , indeed , the present ferment in the Duchies , in Sicily , in jSTaples , in Xiombardy , in Venice , should precip itate that general conflict which seems inevitable between Austria , with " her pale satellites , " and the true Italian nation .
"We know that to this revolutionary war many sincere friends of Italy look as the only possible solution of the crisis . Even the moderate D'Azeglio said , " Why should we do something for the [ Legations alone ? " The Neapolitan and Sicilian liberals , recalling the counsels of [ Lord Minto and the
lamentations ' . of Lord Malmesbury , treat as illusory the hopes of Sardinia to gain the assistance of Western Europe . But there ia a difference between suspecting the sympathy of the British Government , and refusing the co-operation of the Sardinian . Italy has need of concord among her patriots , for they will probably have to fig ht their battle alone .
472 T H E Rli Osl'a B B Bi. [No. 321; Sk...
472 T H E rli OSL'A B B Bi . [ No . 321 ; Sky tniPAY ^
Which Is Which? Wnicn Is The Tory Party ...
WHICH IS WHICH ? Wnicn is the Tory party ? We see on the Opposition benches of the House of Commons crowded rows of gentlemen always ready to upset the Government , but where is the solid Tory party , which professes to be one and undivided ? Ever since tho full of Lord John Russell from the Premiership , there has been a cry among the Tories that , whereas they constituted a large , compact , coherent minority , a number of petty factions , divided in opinion and in interest , without common traditions or common symbols , were always enabled to combine into a majority
for the purpose * of keeping thorn out of office . Thus , after Lord Deeby's general election , a coalesced opposition drove out the forty new Privy Councillors sworn by tho Earl at Windsor , and established the Coalition Ministry of Lord Aberdeen . Impatient of Lord Aberdeen , tho [ Liberals joined tho Tories in expelling him , and Lord Palmerston took his place . And now tho grievance is , that tho Premier , who ia an Oligarch besides being an Imperialist , is maintained in power by an amalgamation of the Liberals , who halo his politics , lovo his patronage , and deprive tho nation of tho jone / its it would derive from a strong
Government resting on the suffrages of a united party . But we do not see any united party any party more united than the Whig . Certainly the Tories can boast of no union . They are at war among themselves on almost every principle of legislation and government . The constituencies , moved by Flewker and Frail , sent up to the existing Parliament a minority supposed to represent one set of
principles . When these principles are brought forth in detail , the party splits , and a dozen clans may be distinguished , with a dozen champions . The truth is , that the heads of the Tory interest have abandoned the idea of reaction , while the country gentlemen are enthusiastic on little reactionary schemes of their own , which set them quarrelling and voting without their leaders .
Mr . Spooler has a reactionary impulse on the subject of Maynooth . A large section of the Tory members support him , and , the other day , he gained a majority . But where were the leaders of the party ? Where was Mr . Disraeli ? Not with Mr . Spoonee . When the question arrives at its next stage , they will probably be seen filing off with the Whigs into the Liberal lobby . [ Neither Lord Stanley nor Sir John Pakington supported Mr . Spooner . Then Sir Fuederick XT i
-v > .-Thesiger moves an amendment on the motion for the admission of Jews to Parliament . Mr . Disraeli votes against the amendment , Lord Stanley refuses to vote for it ; yet [ Lord Stanley ' s and Mr . Disraeli ' s organ appeals to the gentlemen of Euglaud against a measure that will weaken the Protestant securities of the realm . In the same spirit Lord Stanley breaks from the Sabbatical body as he promises , at King's Lynn , and elsewhere , to break
from all prejudices , and invites the industrious classes to enjoy their Sunday in galleries or museums ; but , in a journalistic sense , he thinks his policy bad ; therefore , j ournalistically , he opposes it . Here is impartiality , but what of principle ? Again , the serious and well-intentioned member for Droitwich is pledged , whenever the opportunity is afforded him , to give the authority of a Cabinet to his Education Bill , in which case Mr . Henley must change his opinions , stay away , or vote against a Derby Government . LordELLENBOROUGii is bound
to oppose Lord St . Leonards' p lan of Law Reform . Mr . Disraeli cannot agree Avith Mr . Newjdegate on the Jew question . Lord Stanley considers Mr . Spooner , in relation to the Maynooth Grant , as nothing less than a bigot , and nothing more than an obstinate provincial . Lord Stanley , indeed , were his courage more unflinching than would appear from his double treatment of Sunday recreation , in Parliament and the press , could not accept office , on the pretence of carrying out his political professions , with such a body of supporters as the Whitesides , Spoonebs , IIenleys—the real representatives of
Toryism . ^ A Tory ministry , therefore , with tho Earl of Deiiby , Mr . Disbaeli , and Lord Stanley as its leaders , must begin by " putting down " Sir Frederick Tiieseosu , Mr . Newdeoate and " tho Protestant securities of tho realm , Mr . Spooner , and the No-Popery business , Sir John Pa kino ton and hia Education scheme , and all tho Tory gentlemen whoso abro
dead idolatry clings to the forms of an - gated Sabbath ; or it must leave theao questions open , and govern without a system or a principle . In tho actual state of parties and opinions , that may not sooin difficult ; yet there is this anomaly in tho political condition of England : at a general election the eonHUtuoncioH , whatever they may think of Wlngfl or [ Liberals , will not lmvo n Tory majority .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 17, 1856, page 16, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_17051856/page/16/
-