On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Oct. 19, 1850.] *&%t &*&&*?? 715
-
NEW NOVEL BY DUMAS. La Tulipc Noire. Par...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Montgomery's God And Man. God And Man: B...
notony of cause and effect , and are , in a physical sense of relative action , * the same yesterday , to-day , and for ever . ' But a Being , greater and more glorious than Nature far , once came forth from the recesses of His eternity to visit our sinful world , and before the regal fiat of His lips her ancient fixities were interrupted , and her uniform sequences gave way . "
Surely , Mr . Montgomery has erudition enough to know that the question about miracles was never this : could God alter the course of Nature ? but this : did he alter it ? Mr . Montgomery asks how any man can remain unmoved by the miracles ; no one does who believes them ; the question to be settled is : Were these miracles ever performed ? One more sample and we have done . Speaking of the " originality " Christ ' character , he says : —
" Certain German rationalists and profane speculators in our English schools of infidelity have ventured to talk of Christ as a mere historical Myth ! ' But the deriiers of the Redeemer ' s historical reality appear to forget that , by this mad and miserable theory , they virttiaily declare the biographers of Jesus Christ toere tliemselyes so many counterfeits of their own ideal representation . In other words , unless we believe the Saviour to have been
indeed the incarnated Son of the Everlasting Father , we must transfer the recorded graces of Jesus to the inventive minds of the Evangelists , —because this charge of historical invention renders these writers , in a more or less degree , the very archetypes whence they produced the Christ they exhibit ! Yet who does not at once perceive that , if this be asserted , then the moral impossibility is more astounding to pure reason than the superhuman grandeur of Christ is to the principle of faith ?"
This is queer doctrine , and must startle poets , novelists , and dramatists . It was not generally thought that Richardson was the archetype from whence Pamela proceeded , nor did her untroubled virtue invest the author with saintlike glory . But Mr . Montgomery knows better : he knows it is impossible for the intellect to imagine a being greater and purer than the man who imagines it . Upon the «* Avvfulness of Human Speech , " he is , as you may expect , magnificent . He believes that the sway of words is more awfully vast than even
that of mere reason can be " ; and a torrent of declamation thunders down to prove that words are little short of omnipotent . It will be cruel we know to disturb this theory , but we cannot help asking him whether , on reflection , it does not appear to him that the potency of words is proportionate to the meaning they convey ? If an orator flings forth " rabble rousing words " and a barricade results , cannot you , who are a philosopher , perceive that the words only roused the rabble because they had meaning in them ,
terrible meaning to the rabble ? Is it not mind which influences mind ; and are words more than the winged messengers of communication ? You think that words are potent : strange error ! There are words enough in your volume , but they are not at all potent . " Printed , written , or spoken , we may well believe that human words affect all we are in time with their sway , and influence all we may become in eternity by their consequence . " Yes ; but there is one condition you have overlooked , viz ., that there be
meaning in them . Mr . Montgomery not only clings to the God of the Jews and the morals of the Bible with greater pertinacity than theologians of our day generally exhibit —forgetting ( to use the noble language of Jeremy Taylor ) that , when God took upon him the two appellatives of " Father of our Lord Jesus " and the * ' God of Peace , " he was pleased to lay aside his title of the 11 Lord of Hosts , " forgetting that Christianity itself was a radical setting aside of the merciless dogmas of a barbarian people—but Mr . Montgomery also clings with the same fervor to that noble institution which
carries out with such perfect purity , effectiveness , and disinterestedness , the doctrines of Christianity . Every one sees that we mean the Church of England . In defence of the Church hear how he treats Dissent : — " Dissent is from beginning to end , in origin , nature , and action , a subjective movement , having no outward authority from God , and no positive authentication from history , or ancient tradition from man , —to sanction its claims and support its pretensions . On the other hand , there stands the Church ! the one apostolic catholic Communion of England : and she claims to be the
priestess and educatrix , the spiritual guide , moral teacher , and social regenerator of the empire . Catholic is her name because Christ is her head ; Apostles are her founders ; and Scripture is herruleof faith , attested by the one creed , which martyrs and saints have visibly proclaimed , and palpably taught . Neither civil power , nor human reason , nor conscience , nor will , nor expediency , nor social want , nor moral need , nor spiritual exigency , called this Church into being . She is no more created by man than the earth on which he treads , or the atmosphere which , he inhales . All , here , then , is objective , outward , visible , -undeniable , and invincible Fact ; it glares on the
practical conscience and into the plain reason , through the very senses , of a candid statesman ; and thus he need not plead that he is confounded by warring rivals and clashing sects , all proclaiming they each have the truth , and protesting against any political favour being shown to the other . The Church is not a sect : were she only one among sectarian forms of religious development , the State might be puzzled how to decide . But England ' s Church is a divine Reality , and outward and historical Truth , embodied in primeval rites , and public monuments , and traditional ceremonies , which are externally obvious , and authentic as the palpable phenomena of nature itself . " " We must now pause . A variety of passages marked by us , illustrative of his logic , platitude , and incoherence , we must omit : we presume those already given will suffice . But , having expressed our opinion of the intrinsic worth of the book , let us in all fairness add , the sesquipedalian magniloquence sometimes sobers down into real eloquence , and that amid the masses of verbiage there are occasional passages of a high and solemn strain , where the thought finds adequate expression . The following passage , though taste may reject certain phrases , is decidedly powerful : — LONELINESS OP SOUL . " There are countless believers whose hearts are unechoed , and whose bosomed trials are unsuspected , even by those with whom they appear to be in perpetual communion . We do not here allude to monastic isolation of mind , and still less to that morbid egotism , self-concentration , which poetic Byronism has too often both eulogized and fed : but by loneliness we mean that peculiar state of heart and mind where the individual feels isolated , not because he dislikes social manifestation of character , but because both mentally and morally he feels himself incompetent to interpret all he really and fundamentally is . Often , perchance , in some blest hour of deepening intercourse between himself and the friend of his soul , do the secrets of the heart ' s more hidden life come trembling upward to the very brink of outward utterance , and then melt back again into the cloisters of secrecy and silence , as though words were all unfit to unfold the inner man . Again ; there are thousands , whose shrinking delicacy of heart and almost supernatural sensitiveness of spirit have been encreased by some peculiarity of trial , temptation , or bereavement , unto which an inscrutable Providence has submitted their destiny . Thus circumstanced , intellectual reserve , moral shyness , and spiritual taciturnity have a natural origin and almost a necessary sway . Griefs they cannot define ; wants they cannot describe ; aspirations they would dread to submit before the rude coldness of the circle around them , —all these , together with yearnings and dejections , for which language has no term , and with which few can openly sympathize , demand an interpreter who is both human and divine . Human , or a kindred feeling would be wanting ; divine , or accurate perception would be limited . Now , here it is that the omniscient sympathies of the Son of God appeal with almighty tenderness unto a regenerate heart . The abstract perfections of Deity , the creed of a general providence , nay , even the direct promises of Scripture regarded only in their letter , —are all insufficient to cheer the echoless hearts of the sad , the desponding , and the lone . And oh ! what an ineffable comfort it is for the believer to know that there is one who not only beholds him from His throne of glory , but also sympathizes with his secret pang , his bosomed grief , and his voiceless care . The world may misunderstand his character ; the Church be unacquainted with his case ; friend , wife , and child , be all unable to enter behind that shroud of delicate reserve which curtains the soul from
social view ; but his heart-beats are heard in heaven ; not a thrill of pain , nor throb of unrest , nor shade of inward suffering , which the sympathetic Redeemer does not perceive , number , and understand . And , therefore , let that man who is tempted to become the martyr of loneliness , the victim of a cloistered grief , and an uncommunicated woe , — remember a sympathizing Christ , adored in Heaven , is the sublimest antidote for a dejected care , which mourns on earth . "
Oct. 19, 1850.] *&%T &*&&*?? 715
Oct . 19 , 1850 . ] *& % t &*&&*?? 715
New Novel By Dumas. La Tulipc Noire. Par...
NEW NOVEL BY DUMAS . La Tulipc Noire . Par Alexandre Dumas . 2 vols . W . Jeffs * A question , reader ! Do you know what it is , at the close of a London season , fatigued and almost sad * dened by the insipid sameness of the faces and conversation—met everywhere , heard everywhere—and almost misanthropical from weariness of society , to spend a quiet evening with two or three simple friends whoso sympathies move in quite other circles , whose tastes are gentle and sequestered , who love the old poets and the quaint writers of our early literature , ignorant of the * ' great book of the season , "
and careless of all the noisy reputations of to-day r If you know what the delight of such an evening is , you will understand our meaning in comparing La Tulipc Noire with it ; after the tiresome French novels we have lately yawned over , it comes with a quite peculiar freshness . The unhealthy morals , the violations of all canons , both of decency and art , the heated Parisian atmosphere circulating through them , and the exceptional exotic characters and motives which flourish in those hot-beds , give a zest , a piquancy , a morning-freshness to this pretty simple tale , which may possibly load us to exaggerate its
real merits , and of which , therefore , we forewarn you . Perhaps the question may suggest itself , why we read those French novels since we rail against them as so tiresome ? But , does your thinking that parties are stupid prevent your going to them ! At an hour when otherwise you would go to bed , do you not oil your whiskers and look out white gloves , sending Mary for a cab , the expence of which will never be repaid by the night ' s enjoyment ; and do you not find yourself leaning against the doorway in a room
crowded with faces , too familiar to be interesting yet not with the familiarity of friendship , an atmosphere poisoned with over-animalization , a hubbub of conversation , not a phrase of which is worth listening to , forced to exchange commonplaces with a succession of acquaintances , and quitting the house with the melancholy reflection that you had much better have snored the night away in domestic quietude ? And does not this continue through the season ? Yet you go ! Of course you go , partly because you are asked , but more because every now and then you meet a pair of eyes more eloquent even than the lips , or you snatch
half an hour ' s really interesting talk with some man of note , or you flirt , or you are admired—for some reason or other the evening has been delightful , and to enjoy such another you brave a round of parties . Just this motive makes us persist in French novels ; every now and then we find one that repays a whole shelf of improbability , bad taste , and bad style . La Tulipe Noire is such a work . Ce n ' est rien et e ' est charmant ! It has a pleasant naivete and novelty in it which season old materials , and the mastery of Dumas in I ' art de conter has made that charming which would otherwise have been childish . We will
try our hands at an outline of the story . The scene is Holland , the time 1672 , and the opening chapters narrate the assassination of Jean and Cornelius de Witt in a graphic though conventional style , such as we have seen before in endless novels by Dumas . Just before his death Cornelius de Witt sends a faithful servant with a written message to his godchild Cornelius "Van Baerie , bidding him destroy at once , without opening it , the packet he confided to his care . This introduces us to the hero , "Van Baerle , a Dutch youth of much beauty and modesty , but absorbed by that passion of his age and country—the
culture of tulips . He has wealth , learning , health , strength ; and he gives them all to tulips . Success crowns him ; and , as usual , success brings bitter rivalries . His neighbour , Isaac Boxtel , also a tulipist , grows lean with jealousy ; he watches Van Baerle with the vigilance of hate , he ties two cats together by the tail , and throws them at night into the garden of his rival , gloating over the destruction of tulips which their struggles to get loose have effected . Comic , and yet with a point of sadness , is the picture drawn of the envious tulipist and his mild unsuspecting rival .
And now the tulip world is shaken from the crown to the base by the announcement that the horticultural society of Haarlem offers a prize of a hundred thousand francs for the discovery or creation of the Black Tulip , hitherto considered the Black Swan of Flora . Van Baerle and Boxtel of course resolved to win the prize , if possible ; and if Boxtel hated Van Baerle as a rival tulipist , what now is the passion of his hate when he sees Van Baerle in the right direction of discovering the Black Tulip ? He foregoes all care
for his own plants , weeds boldly mingle with his former idols , for he is now possessed solely by the demon of envy and the determination to ateal Van Baerle ' s tulip . With a telescope he watches all his rival ' s movements . He sees Cornelius de Witt visit Van Baerle and confide to his care a sealed packet , which he sees placed in a drawer full of tulip bulbs . Hate , which sharpens all his faculties , enables him to divine that this packet has dangerous political contents . He denounces Van Baerle , who is imprisoned as an accomplice of de Witt . But Boxtel is foiled even here ? for Van Baerle on his arrest
thrust the offshoots of his Black Tulip into his bosom , and carried them with him to prison . The rage of Boxtel when he discovors the inutility of his crime is very comic ; so , also , is the obstinate persistance with which ho follows Van Baerle from prison to prison , in the hope of stealing his tulip . But a guardian angel watches over the virtuous tulipist ; and this is llosa , the gaoler ' s daughter , a charming portrait , drawn with a dexterous hand . She falls in love witii Van Baerle , and aids him in the cultivation of the tulip . For tho various events which chequer their lives , for the progress of their court-
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Oct. 19, 1850, page 19, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_19101850/page/19/
-