On this page
-
Text (1)
-
695
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Parliament Of Tills Week. The House Of C...
argued the question with the coolness , gravity and solemnity of a judicial investigation . On on * ' side appeared Mr . Bethell , Mr . Evans , Mr . aXiXt argulng the right of the Jews to take the oatL with ! out the concluding words . Those words , it was urged , were not intended to exclude the Jews bu tte Jesuits . The 10 th of George I . enacted 2 the ' oath might be administered to Jews , in courts o f justice without the aforesaid words . ' The oath of I &? rth 7 c ? L mrntr . Legi to ' ^
" Instead of the noble lord bein * warranter ! in * mmmm mmmMM
• SsfSiPs ^ sas take it , and who had a right to have it 1 ^^ 111 ^ °
^¦ SjSSS Sfs ae
- Z ^ T ^ u ^& s ? *** r - de - bound by it , and liable to 52 . Si ? ™ ' . should be jury . For some men , to evade t ^ " Case of P " would say a certain form wa « hfn , ? - " ctlon ° * odth , when it was not . GiaSS ^>» bindlD 8 by their religion '
— S &^ Stir ^ th ^^ ^^ ™ * an act , was passed Sn ^ tiK ' douhV 1111 ' ° Ugh their right to make an ««!"?• « oubt respecting Mr . Pease's caTe ¦ tWl ? thaTV ^ Comm ^ on 80 did the Attorney-ofnera ! Ot Unnece « *™ y , and S-J RoZritl . ™ S . " Z *»* D-mmond and
always objected to the w" ? - ? aid he had but he would not take acTvanta g } " that House aw which never was in ^ nded to fffi ^ H ^ ° f the into effect a principle which h ? ii » tO Carry otherwise . ( Hear ) COUld not do 'airly When the Hou . e divided tIi " ^ L """' ' ° "
1-or Mr . Bethell ' s amendment 71 ¦ Majority agains ^ ra ^ e ^ mS ^ ' ' of the d . scussion va 2 h " W > tn £ " * ^ T ^ tion was put , Mr . Unionr Jl , on K » "al mo-Mr . Salomons ouglto bo heard " 1 8 U ^ e 8 ted that . by counsel at th / bar in « . port ' «! ^ 7 ™ elf or his seat . He thought " ls < tJ , ? t M " « to tak « committee appointed o e on UrT ° U"ht to b * » requeued Lord John liul ~? w " 1 " 'ho sub J <> ct . He •^^ ui-hifu i ^ ord John ltuHNoll t ^ " « "j «« i . He and
for that purpose he . noted 'SI T ^ mOlion ' the debate . Mr . An " ooi 1 J ™ nient of John IIukhkm , would „ , » , Mtxo " Utfl tho motion . Lord ^ thought thron , y w , rrwV ° r \ 'v ijounim - ' " could be heard would iZby hiZ ' u ^ » 'o « nona House . Sir Bknjamin iiArf J , "" '' th « bar of tho I ^ % ^ : ~ S "«;^ t = ! thelb . Wing addition " ? £££ ? * t
, . . ° '««»» at tho head of the ( Government ?"" the lloble lo *<* ps = Missss < « " <« ! = He form » ,,, i „„„ , „ f '"<• " » j '' "Itoru „„„ , „ , „ , , ' . = s » - " ' " ouri > i — k ¦ k ^
" ' . arss : s -- ^ - " rs-- ^ - ^
Mr . Reynolds spoke as a Catholic , and he svm pathized with the Jews , though Mr SaLl I 1 said bitter things about ' pi paTl gl ^ Z ? * He then made a lively onslaught on the oSL of aWuS Sdb : ima h gL fi ^ Were " gr 6 at « ^
, " It required men to swear that they would b ^ ar nn allegiance to King James III ., or any of his descend ^ when the fact was that they had ail ien dead So ? e Si »' fifty years ! The person who took this oath fVth swore that he would bear true allegiance to her mJ- f ' and to the descendants of the Princfss SonhU of H ^ Y He ( Mr Reynolds ) was ready to observe ' ihafc ^ th and to bear true allegiance to her Majesty but how ™ u to trace all the descendants of the PrinceT- Q ^ u . f { Laughter . ) Yet thi . was what was termed on ! oV Jhi ? a i ^" ° f thC Briti 8 h - "tlt-tlon ! l ^ rf ^ l
aJS ' aT ^ ^ i ^ S & o 2 ri ^ r b ^^ n ^^ into Parljam ^ t , w .. leSurfagS t JSK 5 ? JeWS { t-oudcrtesof ' Hear , WlVitaKiiWr icrcsts 1 l
" ¦ oi a numernua hnrl . r «<• -. " &' - '" iJ 4 me Hebrew persua ^ ^ eL ^^^ f ^ - of' , ^ e iff saw 1-8- - ^ ^ i ^^ uMisSi . I S ^ eTp ^ std ^ ffiS ^ Tbff ^^ i - thought , if supported by a ° considprnK Whl ? he would be passerby the House ? LoSj ? maJ ? rity . again divided on the ouestitm nf \ a- lhe Ho « se , was negatived by 207 to 59 Tt S ° Urnment ' whic » nature , at , eng , h consented to JSZ ££ Z £ &
raty ^ 'Sffi Wiars
in the no ; Thamber . ThKn fs 8 r " ° ? '"" " > - I . hould beVcentS"Z Mon ° Jy Q * « " " , " - ' bar ' journcd debate . hou . d then be SuZd "' ""• ' ""' ' : "iS" £ ft , i " -. ' ^ rf ¦ J *« — nddres ,, praying her Mait ' stv , n 1 " " "™ t . an ' taken for givL Affec , to £ . ° ^ S- 8 teI « ' < = be '
• or the repeal < , f the Navi s „ „ , 7 "'" " , '" V " " Majesty is empowered to idnn , ' , wh ™ l > y her ' country in wKich a prefcrene ' e h "' " " " y foici K" ' Tessols over Dritish , S 1 S'Ve" '" lu" «»"' l ' H . e ground of L con ^ i " ^ ° "" 'lav . K « 'i <> n . tions had not recinroeat / ., ! ri ' , at '"^ '"ti n na- I-ws ; but ins ^ Z ^ i ^ T ^^ ^^^ I were profiting by our follv T »?» i exuin IjI « they tion was said to be not tho « ° ? JCCt of tho J » o- iVncement of the pVeH ^ t s ^^^ A ^ «« - and &¦ Mr
Mr . W . mon i 2 cd ' ^ aiiouciikhk that the general eV , « ) 2 l " ^ ! ° ° " « " I « . country ; , JlritiHh [) « Vj / com merce of this X ^ : ^ tl : S--t ^ s "nd was killed when Mr jCua ,., ? ° ' Jftn « ' »*" y . , multaneousl the withdraia ? fc ' ^ ° ""u »« i « d imi
. y ^ . V . » « " •" V . " wicntirawiil /» # ¦ > i - —^ "" ^« mad journment of the debate i ? " *! "V HlOU ' tho of course , read a third time aft , r t Cu ? toiM » ^ 1 was , moub on the adjournment ° lncir «« tivo divi ^ " - ' "nd ^ ne ^ S ^ rth ^ " ™» ^ or » ? ' » 8 ' - » ff <« . Mon iv L , ? ° 1 . ° ° ! « o , ,, n « h 7 B ff ° " Monday nVht tlu T VOinm <> " '
! > , . feF in ' .- ; --: ^;^
r-land , or if it wL a pfrsecutin ^ Bntai V Ire ~ tained that " titles" were not ^ ^""' - mainof substance , to whichS " FT' thing 3 very properly attlched And ^^ ha ^ alwa y 8 be ^ remark of Queen El ^ abeth t ^ h qUOted a " homely " of a peer then in the House wTfch hT ^ * ° l ^ hiv - srfujsra . sS f-7---a ? - ^ ttr ^ fe * ?^^ iigsisiipi pn acts of Parliament ? S effii ' " 'W ? 8 ort » aitt
o n _ , " (^«« r , ^ W ) " "" ° ° n cont » vanceS of any kind ! a ^^ 3255 «^^ I measure , and % arneft " y appe , ° ed 1 o . ' hcTo ^ r "' " Xeh ^^ Td ^ iuh ^ J ^^ -s i l i i gsi S ll i 'i operation uSTihJcoiESSe ? ^ Sffde / ^
vernors ' of the fflh frrt ^ PUrd - ^ 1 tolerated even to wnf ^ Ted that a ^ urch refused He dSed ^ SrS ^^™? l were infringed by the rescrin th i blshops which to base a retaliatorv £ ' . ^' tV " ^ rea on on Roman Catholics onlv S 7 He asked for the ceded to every isSfn a ^ ° ^ freed ° COn - Sf ^ taSSS-355 S
the mrjuThS utderX ^ JS h" ^ " ^ ^ not only was the state f ? tv , ' he contended that assumption of titles restor ^ ' ^ i "T * - regard to th ^ 1829 , Lt -ade addlt oSv s ^^ ent eX 1 H ! ° tO the 24 th section of tho Ttlr f tu"gent . He also cited theHous * tn 1 ? i 5 l ? eIle f > «« d appealed to the House to whether hPn ' " « appealed to
say . ^ i ^ 'SAa ^ iF 5 ^ ^ of Scotland ? Beciuse in ? , J" ^ ° »^ n bishops , no deans ! no per ons ? n th - ° Were no titles who wpr . ,. '; .., ? . . ? . " P »« se 8 sion of those mwc- » » v / io were rccnfrnivt ^ i u i --- —«•» wx umst
: ferred that the biVl & e Lc ^ , "T * H f Jl « *«" act of 1829 . He cJ , aracter ^ r » H V 1 ? ^ n of the solent manifesto , " but ^ fil e t t . resc "Pt as an "into answer that , why iis tffiM 7 V ° " ° the bili Wjls Recurring a « ain to tin tin rUentlon not avowed ? desenbe WbSh ^ rmeiSw ^ He" 5 !^ ° ™' right to change the irregular and e ! , V a perfect ment of vicars apostolic to the 3 ° "Ul g ° Verubwhops m ordinary . There wft ^ . T- ° Vernm ent ot " new hierarch y . As far UB tC r ' " i " - real iri th « cerned , the hierarch 1 ad 1 " ? f hl * l s were «««
-X ( 3 ? '' , y , 1 _^ ^ . 1 - »_ J *» 1 * . * J . Jill I'V ftrtlw .,, << m words . " He , " ' , , , "" « xistence excent to want bi ^ r ^^ t ^ f s v ?^ - clause which made he „ ntin ^™? ° , " «"' fore , the acts of the bishops JI ,, \ l "tn " a » d , therediculed the notion that the « , » "" V <> i < 1- 1 Ie ri " had been violated a 81 p , X ^ l ¦ " ? th ° <; rown been defined . The o' 2 " ' wluch bad never in Scotland . There tn ^ S ' ?! ^ ™ « . jectei ch
land , he thought tlu . r ! " " . thll 'K- As to Ire land , lie thought the ; J "UI 18- As ^ Ireif the bill were ^ sed at LT T' "' - ° < 1 Uite »' « ' » = i i « r to admit that theQ ^^ , ^ 1 m ° } ut Jr cland t . on m J < : nglan ,, from tUt wh cil " / " I f " ' ^ ' ^ would be to decide J f ( lld »' ' « K Church . He movcd th , lt t' 't" ° the Irish tune that day three , nor 1 „¦ U bo icud » ^ 'cond /
ne ^; : ^ r -s- ; - r AI - - be appeared isolated t < 2 11 , , dubut ° - < f < ' «» i < J g »« UH convicti ,,, in t ' th " " «» 'ared hi « reliknew that many « yn lth ? ° U ! took - J { " »« they hud not dared U !• . T' hi ' » ' »»«'» «« "Pon hin ,. self the rel , ( 1 ¦! - ' rWHr . ' » ' «* taken I iie dcHcribe , ! the , „ ^ ! > lhty ° » taiuii , lff alone . H « Kland , before } u i , " ° "' - ° IIIIUI ^«««»«« - i « »«» l » t , HMhei ., , | 1 ( . t 1 v " . J "' ; 1511 "" « f " •« i > 'H re-3 »^^ S ^^ ^ MS ^^' i br ^ -S- ^ H ^ s ^ iKSr ^ . fesa iSaS
695
&!> * a ^ ait ^ t *
July 26 , 1851 . J ^ ^ l ^ B ^ l ^ i ^^^^
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), July 26, 1851, page 3, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_26071851/page/3/
-