On this page
-
Text (2)
-
I March 30, 18 50.] Wfyt 3Ltti&tt. 15
-
NEW GERMAN BOOK ON SHAKSPEARE. Maktpeare...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Caklylie Against Downing-Sthekt. R Jatln...
1 past experience , long continued now , I should say with 1 brevity , ' Either of them—neither of them . ' If our 1 Government is to be a no-Government , what is the matter I who administers it ? " 1 Not in this official class of officials or ex-officials I must we look for our official man ; nor is he to be I eliminated by constitutional processes :- I i < a _™; _T , _» , rnnOOt ; nn _ir _* _* _aaAi wk . 1 . ni , oP « n , _;« I and _takTfnKd the < _Judder of Government , ' othlr _^ fse I called the ' spigot of taxation '; shall it be the Honourable Felix Parvulus , or the Right Honourable I fett _^ anl _^ r 5 _ffint C _tX e epi ng of f _^ _ZZS goes on everywhere , we manage to settle that ; to have it declared , with no bloodshed except insignificant blood I _^ _et _andTnlsh _^ { darkens all the air , that the Right Honourable Zero is to be the man . That we firmly settle ; Zero , all shivering with rapture and with terror , mounts into the high saddle ; cramps himself on , with knees , heels , hands , and feet ; and the horse gallops—whither it lists . That the Right Honourable Zero should attempt controlling the horse—alas , alas , he , sticking on with beak and claws , is too happy if the horse will only gallop any whither , and putlic h g ° oodo _^ except , if he could but devise it , some measure that would please his horse for the moment , and encourage _rnSKn" _^ wearing . This is what we call a Government , in England , for nearly two centuries now . " What then to do ? " More important , " as Carlyle says , " than the past history of these offices in Downing-street is the question of their future existence . " Thegreatthingtogetis " ablemen ; " the great thing to eschew is dulness and stupidity and " darkness" of any sort . Yet we cannot , with the writer , assume once for all that human intellect—the ratiocinative faculty—is the embodiment of God upon earth , and that the ignorance of man , or darkness , is " the Devil . " Intellect for its purposes , instinct for its purposes , impulses of affections as great as either ; but all of these are human faculties ; and all , if God there is as we believe are subject to God . If -we rely solely upon intellect , then truly can we but clinch the nail that has been driven in , to rivet our bondage faster ; for it is by forgetting the influences beyond the pale of intellect , —the affections and the forces , that must , and do , and will govern the world , influences which are to be called forth and directed by somethin _g that may go parallel and harmoniously with _intellect , but yet is not identical with intellect nor inferior to it , —it is by forgetting these powers that exist amongst us , and will act , forgotten or remembered , that the men of our day have lost the faculty of commanding the affections of the people , or of using their powers as the bodily instrument with which intellect works . Therefore is it that the Demosthenes-Cicero of our time speaks . . ., e ., _c , , _•* £ _*! . not to the ears of the Senate or people , with the . _, , r ,. . . , i _^ i _ii j actual sound ot living voice , but pokes a tool-called pen into the unsenttent ink , ana casts forth his jeremiades to a pamphlet-buying public who buy , , , . * , \ , _* j read , and _regret-and there it ends . Still it is true that we want abler men in Parlia- , , , , _y . _,., . ,. | .. j > mont—men placed there for their ability ; men of _«* _„ ,, _* , tvmiii _^ .. _™ o ,, _„««• v _. _000 ? v , _^«»« Vv « t _, _q « _, _;«„« such mould as may not pass through the sieve ot electoral tests or Reform-Bill qualifications . It is true that , if you look among the twenty- seven millions , you may find " diviner men ' * tl ,. n + > , _ _v , o -ji . _!^_ on wu _1 _« v . ; D _„«„ , of _+ v . _« _v , _aa A than trie beadle race which is now at the head of affairs . True , that the rotten Parliament and _pocket-borough system did let in , by the whim of _borou"hmon"ers men not onlv diviner but men ot boiou hmon 0 ers , men not only diviner , but men governed by the personal impulses which , after all , . . ,. J . , A .. _v _m , _u _* _•* . * * originate great human actions . The substitute for that is _Carlylc . joint of the wedge for reform in OYyning-stiect : th . _tiu _i _^^ . _"&^« M ? S _^ SSjS . < _SSi ? ra the Government-offices shall be selected without reference to their power of getting into Parliament ; that , in short , the Queen shall have power of nominating the half- _prS ' _* ' _iTS . _'SSht'SSS _& _'S _^ ffiSr _^ S _. _" _'JitaSI scats there , without reference to any constituency but her own only , which , of course , will mean her Prime eii : _Su r Uon tf' _^ ll _^ f , _^ _riJTu . _" » S 3 » 1 _SnJ change in present methods , and I almost think a maximum in results to be derived therefrom . The Queen nominates John Thomas ( the fittest man she , much- _^ _Zl _&^ Jl _^^& 5 _to _£ _^ B _W _oaS £ 5 ! under or , perhaps , even upper secretary of what she and her Premier find _suitablest for a working head so emi- nent , a talent so precious ; and grants him , by her direct pd . Or thIl offi _^ . u _^ er _Secre _^ a r _^ _avfn gn _^ e _" to in Parliament , and being so bound to be in favour thcro ,
Caklylie Against Downing-Sthekt. R Jatln...
would , I suppose , at least till new times and habits come , be expected to be chosen from among the People's mem- bers as at present . "
I March 30, 18 50.] Wfyt 3ltti&Tt. 15
I March 30 , 18 50 . ] _Wfyt _3 _Ltti _& tt . 15
New German Book On Shakspeare. Maktpeare...
NEW GERMAN BOOK ON SHAKSPEARE . _Maktpeare . By G . G . Gervinus . 3 _vols . 8 vo . London : D . Nutt . Thb Germans arrogate to themselves immense superiority in the critical appreciation of Shakspeare , and Englishmen have somewhat too easily acquiesced in those claims . Although -we think German criti- cism has , on the whole , as much , darkened and T _^ ff _*" 8 ***** - * _*» . _«»« _?* . «* simplified it , we cannot withhold the praise of pains- taking investigation , and serious thought . Vicious hT _^ LT _^^ _ZrP _^ to _^ l _^ txcs » combined with an inordinate love of rhetoric , have displaced the real subject , and given us ambi- tious verbiage where we needed calm inquiry and Vo _^ _t _, Tw » _rr # mtinn nf _nnptip truth * -n _pvprthplpsq £ ht » Jceen P er _<* Ption of poetic truth , nevertheless the reverence felt for Shakspeare has been so deep , and the patience with which his works have been studied so steady , that , with all deductions , we must admit the in quiries hav e not been witho ut valuabl e results . Here is the last and , by many degrees , the best spe- cimen . Innumerable as the writings on this subject _rr h h y _- _^ in _r Sen 8 rf e _fwaT S XrL U _^ Engl _« h industry has gone far towards clearing up the manifold obscurities in which every section of this great topic is involved ; and Gervinus , dex- terously availing himself of all the results hitherto obtained , steers clear of dry antiquarianism on the one hand , and of cloudy philosophism on the other , He has written an eminently instructive book . It brings much and suggests much . The name of Gervinus was a guarantee . There is no literary history to be placed beside his " German Literature , "—a work as admirable for its criticisms as _* ° r its honest exhaustive erudition . The qualities which make that work conspicuous in its class shine , in this work on Shakspeare , in undiminished lustre , It has not , indeed , the glowing rhetoric and felicitous P nrase of A . W . Schlegel , but it is free from his wil- ful adoration and shallow philosophy . Ithasnotthe occasional acuteness of Tieck , but it is free from his extravagancies . Above all , it is free from the pon- derous philosophism of Herman TJlrici , and the scho- lastic " profundity " of Rotscher . Not in detached apercus _, nor in brilliant epigrams , does the merit of this work consist ; but in the calm equable light of a clear and _meditative mind , which , thrown upon the whole subject , brings it out distinctly . Every step you take » 80 methin S of the haze wluch hovered over the subject gradually disappears ; you close the book Wlth the _eviction that you have gained a clearer ? nd more consistent idea of Shakspeare than you had be £ ore' ,. , . . , U 1 . . _. , ,. Something of this is , doubtless , owing to the his- „ . . , _^ ? . , , , f . . . . _x torical treatment , whereby each question as m its . , . J ,. ,. ; . ,, ., PJ ° P e _f P laC ? ' _, ™ cexve ! b _« . . ° m . tlie . ° th ? T » ' ? he ? _* rwrt _™ ethod 1 S no les _* ™ n _» criticism than in science . Gervinus properly begins with Shak- Stratford . He does not pretend _r _' . , , , x to give an accurate picture ; he knows that every _^ - v , ,. « . . _^ _« account of the poet ' s life must be a matter of guess- work and infereilce from a few scanty , insignificant _ .. ,. , _t _?«» tov . \ n A _, f * _. , _~ A facts \ B _^ tak . in _S all / , th . at _^ ngl _' 8 h _m _*™** an _^ sagacity have discovered xn the shape of fact and probability , he therefrom constructs a programme of * V , _' ,.- _, . _^ . ¦ , -, _T ° , . . , the poet s life , such as it stands out before _^ mind 1 hen foows an admirable chapter on " Venus and Adoma _» and " Lucrece / considered as the first- Stratford period . After that we see o , . T , _^ „« , * _± -u Shakspeare in London . The dramatist begins . * the _^ q £ society _^ of b nterature fa at _^ period > GeivinU 8 introduces dissertations on the early dramatists and « the _««! _, _«« .. -dun m » w historical and ™ - thetical criticisms on the plays of the first period— " Titus , " " Pericles , " " Henry VI ., " " Comedy of Errors , " and " Taming the Shrew ; " the second V ** - » _I' _** _*™ _Ottoman of Verona , " ' ¦ Love ' s Labour Lost , " " All ' s Well that Ends Well , " " Midsummer Night's Dream , " " Romeo and _*»«* _¦ " " _}? ° _"ant _«* Venice . " the " KichardS , ;; " Henrys , " " King John , " and " Merry Wives . ' The discussion of biographical significance of the sonnets closes the second volume . The third volume _«»«•«»• _«!» _t"rt period of his style- "' As You Like It , " «• Much Ado , " " Twelfth Night , " " Mea- sure for Measure , " " Othello , " "Hamlet , " " Mac- beth ' . .. Lear .. «< Cymbclinc . " The fourth volume , not yet published , will contain the remaining plays , and the general characteristics of Shakspeare ' s style ,
New German Book On Shakspeare. Maktpeare...
By the admirable use of historical criticism applied to these _nlavs he is enabled to _nlar >«» miioh tii _. _f to mese piays , ne is enablea to place much that was dubious in a clear and satisfactory li ght , and not only to lead us to a better _undemanding of the plays themselves , but also to a clearer view of the genesis of Shakspeare's poetical and dramatic style . That he could not have done this had not the materials been furnished by English critics is to be _underwood ; his merit lies in the thorough grasp of these materials , and the adroitness of their application There J- * fulness of knowledge and a largeness . f .. _^ - Uon in this work which render it very delightful . It is a whole , not a collection of fragmentary _^ T _^ ? h » v _« _? . P « " ? ?* _^ _meditation and masterly workmanship ; and in this sense it is peculiarly worthy of the great subject it deals with _, A pure historical spirit runs through its pages , which , _*» < _. _«< _,.:.. e * \ _.-u r j * \ _T j j j massing facts as they are found to hand , deduces conclusions from them without stopping to splinter the narrative with bickerings and sarcasms without drawing away your attention from the main question to any irrelevant matters . It is astonishing how little polemical matter there is in its pages , although discussing a subject upon which scarcely two writers _^^ TV _* others the task of disputing , he rarely disturbs the even tenor of his way ; but , having facts to state and views to develop , he marches steadily onward to his goal . One thing the English reader will assuredly miss , and that is the fine discriminating analyses of character in its involuntary self-betrayals—the glimpses of passion—the _twistings and torturings of sophismthe subtle penetration of motives which abound in , Shakspeare , and which our critics have from tho earliest times delighted to point out . The acuteness and gusto of Coleridge , Hazlitt , Lamb , and others , which arrest attention upon details of exquisite beauty , will not be found in Gervinus , who eschews details , and whose style of criticism is avowedly borrowed from that celebrated critique on " Hamlet " which Giithe gave in " Meister , " and which Gervinus holds as the exemplar of all fruitful criticism . Nor will the student of dramatic art gain any insight from these volumes . " The Edinburgh Review , " in a recent paper on _Shakspeare _' s critics , expressed its dissatisfaction at the singular neglect of the great dramatist ' s excellence as a theatrical artist by all critics , and pointed out how every one had busied himself with explaining Shakspeare ' s art as that of a poet only , not *> f a dramatic poet . Gervinus is more open to this reproach than most critics . On the other hand he is alive to the absurdity of _supposing-as Gothe and others _suppose—bhakspeore s plays to be unfit for representation :-" Shakspeare ' s works , " he says , " , properly _speakine _; , only be understood in _representation . For . { _. Ir _., _^ * v , ot _ftniom . _™ ti _>» v writtpn Thp _spmritinn that and that only wire they written , _xne separatum between dramatic art and theatric art , which has with us _damaged botTwas not known in lho 8 _' e day 8 . The great difficulty in understanding any of ku . play , arises from the fact of our reading , and not seeing , them , lor crowded a . they are with poetical _beauties , psychological traits wise aphorisms , and allusions to persons and things ot , r , _Q ? : „ . _„ * _v , a fltto ,, ti ,, n i « distrarttd bv these details tne _^ i the attention is aistracua uy _tneBe _ueiuus , which render it difficult to grasp or to enjoy the whole _, But when they are represented by players equal to the task , here a division of labour steps in which _makea the one art more easily appreciable and enjoyable by moans of the other . Players who have _rightly conceived their parts save us from the terrible labour in _reading of _{ _„ .,: __ - . a . n _. _,., „ _, _„?« _HiflVrfnt characters Rcnarnic _£ _^ , £ 2 _^^^ mu tual relations , ' the appearance , carriage , _language , ftnd _gesture of each individual actor explain to u 8 , without any effort , as in a picture , the figures and pivots of th *» _Ration " lne action . _sputable , and could never have been doubted had not i our love for Shakspeare made us such students of his plays that we read and reread i them after having seen them _perfar _^ _d ( i . e ., after j having gained a distinct idea through the represcntation ) , and then , forgetful of the benefit derived from representation , we picture to _ournelves how much UUer the _playa would be if , hey could be acted by ideal actors ! But , to gain an adequate idea of the valueofstage representation , let any one rccal a perusal of Beaumont and Vtatehn or Ben _Jonson-tnot is of ; , plays he has rot seen _rcprcscntccl--and tho wnnt ol ; | distinct apprehension of their significance as works ; of art will at onco suggest the true explanation . ; , | Gervinus not only maintains his thesis with respect !; _, to the actable plays , but also with respect to that ? _.- ; most difficult of all \ )\ a . _yat " Tho Midf 3 ummer Night ' s j , Dream . " Hazlitt said , and said truly , that when the , _,: j play was acted it was " converted from a delightful f | fiction into a dull pantomime . All that is finest in the t . if
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), March 30, 1850, page 15, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/ldr_30031850/page/15/
-