On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
clearly connected . There are , moreover , many other phenomena of the inner life which language can only imperfectly describe , but of whose existence we are entirely convinced . In such cases we can only say , in the noble language of Emerson , " After all , the rapt sa int is the only logician ; " or remind the objector of the not less idealistic language of Paul , « ' That faith is the substance of things hoped for , the evidence of things not seen . " Mr . Newman sufficiently proves that this faith exists in an early stage of the spiritual consciousness , and he thinks that the «« instinct which seeks after God and the Infinite is the most powerful in man . "
Whilst he admits the necessity of moral restraint to regulate the exercise of the spiritual faculties , he still protests against the vague charge of mysticism being brought against those who find a higher law within them than is realized by any positive creed . It is not by power of intellect that we grasp the realities of religion , but by looking inwards on the
soul , where the image of God is reflected with a clearness proportioned to the brightness of the mirror . " Let us not deal more slightingly , " adds Mr . Newman , " with the testimony of the soul than with that of touch or taste . " It is clear , therefore , that he considers the inward witness of the spirit as real and as trustworthy as that which belongs to the outward
senses . Upon this grand basis , then , Mr . Newman believes that all real religion must be founded . God has revealed to the soul of man " all things that pertain to life and godliness . " Against the prevailing Bibliolatry he strongly protests , as leading us away from the proper business of our souls ; " for why , " he
asks"Why should any one study to develop from within a knowledge of right and wrong , when , if his results clash with those of a book , he will have to trim and prune himself into shape ? It is easier and safer to crush inward sentiment in order to receive the truth by testimony from without ! This is the carnal and dense covert under which every
superstition has found shelter , and which , if it be not torn down , will , in e ' very age , foster as much uncleanness and cruelty in the Church as the moral light abroad in the world will allow . " In his second chapter Mr . Newman proceeds to analyze , with a skilful hand , the origin of a " sense of sin" in the soul , exposing the various perversions which the doctrine hag suffered at the hands of fanaticism and superstition , —far too large a subject for us to enter upon within our scanty limits . And in his
third chapter he discusses the " sense of personal relation to God ; " defending the doctrine from that hypercritical philosophy which would regard the intercourse of the Finite with the Infinite as metaphysically impossible . In this matter he forcibly argues that the spiritual facts asserted by religious men of all ages are stronger than the conclusions of speculative reasoning . He next traces the
development of the religious nature in connection with the affections , and declares that the soul must become not only " as a little child , " but even as a woman , in its trustful tenderness and faithful love of the " Father " and the ' * Bridegroom . " Such a condition of the soul reconciles it to all the apparent hardships of its condition , and even chastisement becomes an argument of the divine love . To show the connection
between religion and the affections , he quotes the spiritual language of all ages , in which God is addressed as " Father , Brother , Friend , King , Master , Shepherd , Guide , " &c , but gives the preference to the metaphor of marriage as best explaining the relation of God and man . " And why , " he asks , need the soul scruple to say that she is * partaker of the Divine nature ' if God loves her and dwells in her bosom ?"
The two opposite perversions of the doctrine of " new birth , "—the one the Calvinistic notion , referring it to irresistible agency , without any effort of the soul herself , and drawing a dark line between the regenerate and unregenerate , the godly and ungodly ; and the other the gross superstition of supposing that a child is born again by the magical sprinkling of water—are strongly denounced : the first as " immoral bigotry , " and the last •« dead mechanism . "
The fourth chapter ( " On Spiritual Progress ) treats of the struggles of the soul , touched and awakened by divine love , for the attainment of ideal excellence . Our author boldly criticises those rigid and pharisaical ethics that would repress , as necessarily hostile to religion , those expressions of joy and gladness that axe natural to the human heart ,
—the love of the beautiful in nature and art , and the free exercise of the social affections . In such matters the law must be looked for within us , for " a book revelation on such subjects is impossible . " Nay , more , he denies that the example of Christ himself can be held up as a perfect for the guidance of his followers . Our own inherent spiritual instinct must be here a better guide than either dogmatic ethics or personal example : the spiritual , here as elsewhere , transcends
the moral life . Our immorality consists in outraging , by our vices and sensuality , those divine instincts of the soul which , when kept pure and active , can alone bring us into direct personal intercourse with God . It is impossible to judge of the value of a rule except by its effects on our religious character : the opera may be innocent , and the chapel a snare to us . " The upright and faithful soul knows and feels what things do , and what do not , impair communion of the heart with God . "
There is a remarkable passage in this chapter ( page 178 ) which deserves especial notice , as vindicating from the fanaticism of modern creeds the true scriptural doctrine of spiritual influences . We are reminded that this doctrine was taught in its simplicity by prophets and apostles long before we heard of two spirits of God—the one * ' ordinary , " and the other " extraordinary "; the one " dictating propositions , " and the other " inclining the hearers" to receive them . Every living member of Christ ' s body was then supposed to be animated " with the selfsame spirit . "
No written law was or could be appealed to—but one written " on the fleshy tables of the heart . Men were admonished not to quench this spirit ; but now it is declared by Mr . Newman that , " by idolizing the letter , men do quench it , and then are unable to understand that very letter which they blazon forth in purple and gold" ! Nobly does Mr . Newman everywhere vindicate the spirituality of Paul * s religion ( so sadly perverted to the uses of fanaticism ) , by showing how entirely he rejected all other teaching but that of the " inward witness . "
In reference to the observance of the Sabbath , and many other outward means of grace , which , founded originally on fellowship , have passed into dead formalities , Mr . Newman expresses the clearest and most rational views . He plainly declares that Sundays are not Sabbaths , and that Sabbaths are no part of Gentile Christianity . " He points to Paul ' s contemptuous rejection of the Sabbath as conclusive against the arguments of the English Puritan and Scotch Sabbatarian , and reminds us that up to the
days of Constantine such Sabbaths were unknown to the Christian churches , and that it is * ' an ancient and Catholic doctrine "; that the observance of Sunday is an ordinance of the church , and not a command of God . Of course we have only room to glance at the subject , which is discussed with learning and research , whilst its bearings on the condition of the people , morally and spiritually , is clearly explained . A clear and comprehensive inquiry follows , into the philosophy of religious worship , its end and purpose , its uses and abuses .
The fifth chapter discusses a question ( " Hopes concerning a Future Life ") at once so vast , so solemn , and so interesting , that we feel embarrassed in approaching it from the fear that we may misrepresent the views of the writer in our necessarily brief and imperfect notice . Of course , we can only give the merest outline of the arguments produced . From the « ' Phaedo " of Plato to the most modern treatise on the subject , it is assumed that the mind cannot perish by the dissolution of the body . This Mr . Newman declares to be unscientific—in fact , he calls it "
unmeaning jargon . " The purely Christian argument , that the idea of another world is necessary to redress the inequalities and injustice of the present , is equally rejected , as impeaching the Divine government , and imputing injustice to the Infinite . The idea of immortality , it is argued , is not necessary to stimulate our virtuous exertion , and that , if we rely on prudential motives of rewards and punishments , we ignore the power of conscience and the love of virtue for
its own sake . This Mr . Newman thinks is " deeply corrupting . " His argument is in this respect similar to that of Strauss in his " Soliloquies . " There is , then , no logical proof of the existence of the soul after death , and our utmost assurance is derived from that " longing after immortality , "—that spiritual yearning for a perpetual union with God , which belongs exclusively to the religious consciousness . Both the Old and New Testaments are critically examined in this matter , and Mr . Newman does not
hesitate in his conclusion . Some things in this chapter may at first sight be painful to some religious minds , but we believe that much misapprehension has existed , and slill exists , as to the meaning of the author . But let us quote his own words : — " But do I then deny a future life , or seek to undermine a belief in it ? Most assuredly not ; but I would put the belief ( whether it is to be weaker or firmer ) on a spiritual basis , and on none other . Our hopes , then , of a future life are not supported by the certainty of external revelation , but depend exclusively on our spiritual instincts .
The last chapter of the book treats of the " Prospects of Christianity . " Our author emphatically declares that the present church machinery—based on " Christian evidences , " " mechanical inspiration , " and " doctrine "—is utterly adverse to the spirit of Christianity , and unsuited to the genius of the age . To assume the infallibility of any written law , or the infallible inspiration of any religious teacher , is virtually to stifle the spirit of God . The only parties to the religious compact are God and the human soul ;
and our vast and complicated system of doctrines , our inspired books , and inspired teachers , are utterly valueless except in so far as they present this simple relation clearly and forcibly to the minds of men . Abundant proof is given of the fallibility of the Bible records , and of the infirmities and errors of their writers ; and yet we continue to regard these writings as the literal utterances of the spirit of God ! Our God is no longer a " living God "—ever present with usfanning the feeble flame of our heavenward
desiresministering hourly to our spiritual wants , and feeding the hunger of our souls ; but rather a far-off and mystical abstraction , enveloped in the clouds of priestly incense , and lost in the dreams of religious metaphysics . Man no longer talks with God face to face , and consults him as his daily monitor and familiar friend , but is content to approach Him through , the medium of an accredited ambassador , with
solemn formalities and distant prostration . Like the early Israelites , we still believe that " no man can look upon God and live ; " and our Father and our Friend is regarded in the light of a severe and even cruel magistrate . It is to this prevailing coldness and pedantry in the present system of religious teaching , which enters so little into the true life of humanity , that we must attribute the Pantheistic tendencies of
the educated and the infidelity of the ignorant . A thousand difficulties of history and philology , requiring the most accurate learning and the most patient research , are now to be encountered to establish the simple and catholic doctrines of Christ , which were first taught with such wondrous effect to the poor fishermen of Galilee . Surely Christianity may be taught now , as it was then , as a purely spiritual creed—a revelation to the soul of man requiring no other expositor than the Lord of the
conscience . Is it just to anathematize the unlearned for historical doubts which they cannot solve , and for the rejection of doctrines they cannot comprehend , except by the doubtful teaching o £ wrangling controversialists ? The Gospel must again be taught by the " demonstration of the Spirit and of power , " and not by " the enticing words of man ' s wisdom . " The complicated theology of the Church is , to the true Christian pastor , what the " beggarly
elements " of Judaism were to Paul . He has to eschew the same tyrannous traditions , the same lifeless forms , the same priestly pretension and vicarious sacrifices—all of which tend to make the living word of God of no effect . Whilst we are wielding these old and clumsy weapons , instead of the " sword of the Spirit , " a black infidelity is growing up around us , to combat which Mr , Newman tells us that " action of a totally different kind must
be set up . An appeal must be made to the soul , and not merely to the intellect of man . An appeal to mere intellect will result in proving that historical religion is " as essential a contradiction as historical astronomy or mathematical religion . " All this criticism of the popular creed ( of which we can give but an imperfect idea in our brief notice ) is deeply
significant of the wants and condition of the age . It is because there is no reality , no life , no real faith in the modern churches , that the minds of many , who care for these things , are turned so dreamily on the past . Hence our somewhat sickly sentiment for 11 Catholic antiquity , " ecclesiastical architecture , and priestly costume , —our Camden , our Parker , and Reformation societies , which have almost brought us
Untitled Article
April 6 , 1850 . ] ® & £ fttAfrtt * 3 S
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), April 6, 1850, page 39, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1839/page/15/
-