On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
on his life , is enabled , without any sacrifice of pre-Bent comfort , to leave the younger branches of his family , who would otherwise have been wholly unprovided for , in comfort and independence , without at all embarrassing the heir to his estates . The farmer , holding the lease of a valuable farm determinable on the death of the survivor of three lives , but renewable on payment of a fine of £ 500 at the termination of the last life , may assure the only existing life , on the duration of which the lease depends , for £ 500 , and thus secure the means of continuing his farm . Or suppose a tradesman , finding- himself involved to the extent of £ 2000 , but with a flourishing business only requiring
time to enable him to pay his debts . His creditors are satisfied that the money will eventually be paid , and appoint two of their number to investigate the state of his affairs every three months . By effecting an assurance on his life , payable out of the profits of the business , they secure themselves against loss in case of their debtor's death . The application of life assurance also facilitates improvements . A man of capital enters into partnership with the discoverer of an important improvement in machinery , by which a large fortune might be realized , but for which the outlay in the first instance would be considerable : he assures the inventor ' s life for
£ 7000 for a term of seven years at a premium of £ 1 2 s . lid . per cent . Thus he protects himself from loss in case of his partner ' s death before the invention can be brought to perfection . In the case , also , of partners retiring from business , the principle is most valuable . Perhaps the arrangement is , that one shall retire upon an annuity of £ 500 : the retiring partner , to secure himself from loss in case of his partner ' s death , assures the life of the latter for a sum sufficient to purchase an annuity of like amount .
The course of true love never runs smooth , and perhaps one of the chief causes of this is , that the wheels of Hymen drive heavily for lack of the anti- attrition which is the god of our day . One of the most interesting features of assurance is the means it affords of removfcig the frowns from foreboding fathers , and of softening the hearts of irritated relations and guardians . A policy of assurance is a legal and valuable settlement on a wife , and may be made to atone for a slender balance at the banker ' s . For instance , a person having a life income of £ 1000 a-year , vvtio is desirous of marrying the daughter of a rich man , answers the objections made by the lady ' s friends as to Iris inability to
provide for his wife and family in case of premature decease , by assuring his life for £ 8000 , and settling the policy with the necessary sum out of his income for payment of the premium . Or a merchant marries a lady with £ 5000 , part of which he desires to employ as capital in an old-established firm , with which he is about to form an advantageous partnership . The trustees object without a proper security for the repayment of the money in case of his death before it is replaced . An assurance is effected on his life for £ 3500 , the money lent ; £ 1500 invested on mortgage at 4 J per cent ., out of which the premium of £ 64 6 s . 3 d . is paid : and the affair is thus arranged to the satisfaction and advantage of all parties .
We have here shewn a few only of the temporary advantages which assurance offers . The adoption of these , however , will always depend upon individual interest . But whenever a man ' s income ceases with his existence , the neglect of life assurance becomes a positive crime against his own kindred and against society . Wherein lies the difference between neglecting to provide for your household while living and leaving them to certain starvation , as far as you are concerned , at your death ? People sometimes say they cannot afford to insure . But will any sane man affirm that he cannot afTord Is . per week to secure £ 100
for his family ? Others are afraid to insure because they may not be able to keep up the premiums . But the use of such an argument should teach a man the imperative necessity for assuring at once . If he feel such difficulty in withdrawing ho much of his income , let him reflect , on the frightful condition into which his family would be plunged , were he suddenly cut off from among them . But though there may be some show of reason in the excuse , in reality there is none . In any case where income in uncertain , the amount assured Bhould be spread over small policies : ten for £ 100 instead of one for £ 1000 . Or in the
" Sovereign " a special arrangement is made , whereby , if difficulty of tlm kind arise , the Policy may be surrendered for u new Policy , without
any further Annual Premium , for a sum to be agreed upon , payable at the death of the assured . There are others who " intend" to assure ; but postpone any assurance , because they cannot spare enough to effect it at once for £ 1000 . The course of such persons is worse than stupidly absurd . They should insure immediately for £ 100 , or what they can afford ; and there are tew who do so this year that will not assure for double the amount in the next . It should by such people also be remembered that every year decreases the chances of being accepted , save at higher rates of
premium . When the cold shiver runs through the frame , when the quickened pulse , the fevered tongue , the patchy complexion , the short cough , and the hectic flush appear , it is too late then to rush to the assurance office and offer yourself for a life policy . Imagine the situation of a man who , suffering under slow decline , feels his energies become less and less , and his resources , at the same time , day by day , decreasing . With the prospect of a speedy dissolution , he knows that all who are dependent upon him—the victims of his neglect—must go forth to seek their bread amid the closed hands and stony hearts of
strangers . Imagine him picturing to himself that which he has seen happen to others , and from which he cannot anticipate any immunity in his own case his household gods roughly handled by strangers ; his conduct coarsely condemned by his " friends ;" the love of his children failing before the rude shocks of poverty , and their respect , by continual and bitter suffering , dwindling down to curses on his memory . It is an awful thing for a man on his death-bed to consider that , ere his corse grows cold , his widow will be haggling with ihe undertaker for the price of his coffin , and that his wife and children must hunger and thirst to insure him a decent sepulture .
Untitled Article
THE PRIEST , THE BISHOP , AND THE SYNOD . The conviction that the troubles and difficulties of the Church can only be composed and solved through the assembling of a synod or council of her members , is daily gaining ground among those who pay even ordinary attention to the signs and exigencies of the times . The differences which have lately occurred in the dioceses of Manchester and Worcester , the uncompromising hostility between
the ruler of the see of Exeter and a large section of his clergy and laity , the forced resignation of Mr . Bland at Norwich , and the reluctant and unrequited abdication of Mr . Bennett at Knightsbridge , besides numberless minor sores and grievances connected with ecclesiastical administration , daily revealed in different parts of the country , tend to strengthen this conviction , and to induce from it a practical result .
Convocation as it now exists is powerless . Prorogued by the Crown immediately on its assembling it meets only to register its own vassalage ; and even if its present ephemeral existence were continued , so as to be coextensive with that of the other estates of the realm , one element of power would be wanting to it , the presence of the laity to share in its deliberations . Without this no church assembly can be complete or satisfactory to the Protestant mind . The people of the Anglican Church are not docile enough to submit to decrees made by their spiritual rulers , in the framing of which they have not
themselves participated . They would prefer that such should emanate from Parliament , or , much as they dislike arbitrary and irres ] K > nsible dictation , from the Crown itself . But the Crown ' s best province is that of administration , and the Executive cannot afford to peril its popularity by the patronage of one party amid the many into which the religious world is divided . The events of the last seven months have shown that its safest and most dignified position is one of impartiality and reserve . Parliament , too , as at present constituted , is confessedly a most unfit arena for the discussion of matters of faith and practice affecting any particular sect or party of
religionists , except so far as these may hear upon the general interests of the realm . What would be said of the fairness of uniting members of the Church of England , to decide upon doctrinal points or ceremonial observances for the Catholics , the Unitarians , or the Society of Friends ? And yet , when Church mattcru are canvassed in the 1 louse of Commons , the representatives of these religious bodies take part in their discussion , and in the votes by which they are determined . This is only explainable on the ground of the connection between Church and State , and the confuttion between spiritual and temporal interests induced thereby . If the Church claims the protection of the annular
power , however heterogeneous the composition of that power , she must accept at the same time its interference , or , further , its domination . The Church must be severed from the State , we are told , if she is to exercise the independent management of her own affairs . We can conceive a Church sufficiently tolerant and comprehensive to be identical with the State ; but , as matters are now we are willing to accept the alternative of separation rather than that of thraldom .
As far as respects doctrine , we should not expect much of unanimity or of toleration , at all events in the first instance , from the newly assembled synod . Its members might meet with professions of amity sincere enough until the conflict of opinion arose to rend the veil of Christian cnarity ; then would ensue fierce debates and angry recriminations common to all assemblies , and especially to those to whom the right of discussion is unwonted , and
from which even celestial minds are not exempt . The majority would lay down a rule of faith and practice so strict as to leave the minority no choice but to submit or secede . This would be an inconvenience ; but it is inseparable from independence of legislative action , and one for which no remedy can be found until the majority learn their duties towards the minority , as well as their own rights . But , as matters are now , this inconvenience is preferable to the present thraldom .
Redress for practical grievances , however , would reasonably be looked for from the new assembly . No single official of the Church would have , as now , the power of crushing one of its ministers , however powerless , or of ignoring his . claims for justice , and for a due investigation of his alleged offences . One duty of the synod , probably exercised through a committee , would be the inquiry into all such cases of alleged injustice ; an arbitration between the contending parties ; and on the refusal of one to plead to its jurisdiction , the justification of the other , and his restoration to his position in society and in the Church . With the existence of such a court of appeal as this , the exercise of irresponsible power would be impossible .
The case of Mr . Harvey , late of Antwerp and now of Boulogne , as against the Bishop of London , is one of a host of which such a synod would take cognizance . Indeed , had such a synod been in being , the case would never have come before the public at all . As it is , it is one of the most painful and perplexing with which we have ever had to deal . The tangled skein of the dispute has remained unravelled for years ; and after lay and clerical dignitaries have been appealed to in vain , public opinion is called upon to undertake the task . In the long series of documents before us , in which Mr . Harvey shows himself a man conscious of his wrongs and determined to obtain their redress , we are told of the various occasions on which the Bishop
has interposed his authority to prevent his appointment to certain foreign chaplaincies , or to aid in procuring his dismissal from them . We learn how , in spite of hia alleged unfitness for the duties of chaplain at Antwerp , he was licensed to those of an English curacy by the same diocesan by whom his unfitness had been pronounced . We find the unwillingness of the rest of the Episcopate to allow him to exercise his duties under their jurisdiction , without his being reconciled to the Bishop of London ; and we see that prelate demanding , as the condition of an amnesty , a public apology of his own dictating , accompanied all the while by a pertinacious refusal to state the grounds of his hostility to Mr . Harvey . All this is stated clearly and
without contradiction , and an ultimate appeal made to public opinion . The verdict of the Press , Conservative and liberal , has been {» iven long ago ; and if that of the public coincides with it and is unfavourable to the Bishop , of which there seems but little doubt , Iuh lordship , we conceive , has only himself to thank for it . He may contend that the verdict in given on ex parte statements , and such to a great extent we admit to he the case ; but , it will be asked , whose fault is it that they are ex parte ? Why does not the Bishop avow the causes of his opposition , and justify to the world the course which now presents him in ho unfavourable a light ? The public would give him fair play as well us Mr . Harvey ; now it can only suppose that he cares not for its opinion , or fears the result of an avowal .
With such a ease as this the dealing of a synod would bo prompt und preremptory . The charges against Mr . Harvey would bo ascertained . If frivolous , he would bo reinstated ; if substantiated , he would be condemned . If no charges were forthcoming , his absolution would follow as matter of course . But , pending the assembly
Untitled Article
£ 84 Cfte Heft )*?* [ Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 21, 1851, page 584, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1888/page/12/
-