On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
divides the trade j but the most pressing is a auestion- concerning the retail price of books . Vor m reasons , a book , as an article oitrade , is published at a fixed price ; the profitof the retailer being- also a fixed quantity , ornearl y so , in the s hape , of an allowance made by the publisher , who ' is represented as being in the position of the manufacturer- Certain of tile retail dealers desire to infringe this rule , by selling the volumes at any price they please , seeking a large range of custom in lieu of a large profit . The upholders of the old plan say for it , that it works well ; in the tradethat
that it secures steadiness ; it has lasted since the days when Dr . Johnson described it , substantially as it exists now ; and that , upon the whole , it encourages production . These are precisely the arguments in favour of Protection . The opposite party replies with the arguments of Free Trade—that monopoly limits use , restrains demand , and by restraining the offer of exchange , diminishes production . Some very pushing booksellers drive a large trade at a small profit , and succeed ; but the quieter kind prefer the certainty of the old system , and dread a state of things which may place them at the mercy of undersellers .
It would be a great blessing for the future of Industry , if a class so intelligent and influential as the booksellers could for a moment pause in the heat of contest , and look at the political ceconomy of the question as it bears upon themselves . The Free-traders are right when they say that monopoly restricts production . But that mere free trade will not suffice for the regulation of industry is proved , not merely by the fact that all who are really subjected to it , cry out ; and still more by the fact , that no party really permits free trade to be thoroughly enforced : least of all , would the Manchester men
permit it . The principle of Free-trade is , that trade be " left alone , " to work out itself . Now , let that principle be fully enforced , and there would be no law for the protection of capital against combinations of the working classes to keep up wages . Carry out the principle , fully , and there ought to be no laws for the protection of credit , which ought to rest solely upon its natural and sole substantial basis , the confidence
between man and man , and not in the unsubstantial basis of factitious laws . But poll the Manchester school , and we suspect that you would liud scarcely a vote given for that complete execution of the Free-trade principle . In the meanwhile , the partial Free-trade , which the professed advocates of full free trade enforce , inflicts loss and injury on all classes veritably exposed to it , because no class is exposed to it with perfect impartiality and fairness . ' For instance , admit free trade into the book busineS 3 , and no rlrmht vnii will swpftn awav a ,
number of dealers , perhaps some of the publishers . Is that no evilP We cannot but regard it as an evil of the first magnitude . Yet we cannot rest content with monopoly or Protection while it oppresses production , and deters immense numbers from benefits that they would otherwise enjoy . AVhatthen is the remedy ? The ono which wo never cease to suggest in such cases—the principle of Concert . That alone reconciles the interest of the existing producer , to which Proicctio n specially directs itself , with the interest , t ' consumer , both actual find nossiblo . In
' boolc irjlc l < N as in every other , there are three primary classes to bo satisfied—the producer , Hie oxch anger , and the consumer ; and that com-W ° i T 8 tand on a aolid and perdurable oasis wluch equall y concerns itself for all those v , Z , , book-trade , tho throe classes arc pi-oaenfco d by authors , booksellers , and roadora ; tim , !? ftrran go » nont to ondure , must consult uie vveUaro of all three elassos . Such arrango-H ! 1 ? bo difficult . The reader ' s in-1 , , , wou ! 1 > ° consulted in a variety of ways , o yT il ] 1 V the . multiplication of " books , aid is h , ? k r ° ^ 1 lt of P ricos - Tho bookseller class Hollo ,. , j lnt 0 two snb-olassos—tho retail Hour' ^ A tho wll ° loBalo publisher ; and when ch " , n A X ° . 0 <; ail ° rs violate tho rules to soil
follol ™ 1 ckloflsiy infringe the domain of their upPHolf / *? mxtisfy their own personal and to ™ S P ' ^ th at which inevitably tends provMiJ ? ° Wn tho wllole ran « ° of P ricea ' without it Btnl- S proper arrangomenta for the interests e ommo ?™ ° rn ? tllc wido 8 l W ly of a £ commodit y . The authors are lit le consulted :
Untitled Article
but it is evident that a very general abatement of prices would injure them , without corresponding benefit to sound literature : it would make middling talents as valuable as any other marketable commodity , and would draw into the field an immense quantity of mediocre invention ; so that it would hardly -benefit literature , and yet might injure existing , authors . The fact is-j that literature in common with the highest kind of art , has but a very imperfect relation to trading laws . In the case of authors , the object should be to leave them as free from direct share in the commercial
transaction as possible . Probably the French system , of paying so much a volume for every copy printed and sold , is one that best secures the interest of the general run of authors , proportions their gains to the trader ' s , and yet leaves them free . But however the special interests be arranged , it is evident that the best thing for all classes is , that all interests should be brought into one view , and act together , each for the interest of all , and all for the interest of each . It would follow , that in considering their own interests , authors and booksellers should consult that of the consumer or reader .
We do not mean , of course , that it would in the present state of society be possible to bring all the classes that we have named together bodily ; stragglers there would always be ; but it is possible to apply the principle in guiding the conduct of the majority . The process would be much facilitated b y some centrical machinery —some society , in which the several classes might all meet on a common , field , open most chiefly to the interests of literature , and to the enduring and broad interests of the classes dependent thereon .
Untitled Article
" POISON "—NOT TO BE TAKEN INTERNALLY . Another stirring controversy is going on in the public press , about the adulteration of beer . The Medical Gazette quoted the statement of a scientific lecturer in Paris , that large quantities of strychnine are manufactured in France , and imported into England , for use in the making of " bitter beer . " A contemporary ^ exploded that " Paris fable of Pale Ale , " admitting that there is adulteration in beer , but denying that good beer can be made by any process of drugging ; and Mr . Bass rushes into the field to confirm that averment . One " M . D . " insinuates that stomachic drugs are used ; on which Mr . Allsop has a tilt at the " fable , " and declares that good malt , hops , and water , with good implements , are the whole materia medica and apparatus of the
brewer . And this is true , so far as bitter ale is ' con cerned . The palato is a sure test of the genuine article , when it is thoroughly genuine , without adulteration or flaw . It would take a Raphael to forge a Raphael , a Paganini to pass for a Paganmi , and nothing short of pure excellent malt and hops to pass for bitter ale . But what Becomes of the plebeian beer , —the cloying ale , that has a fume like a sugar-cask in a tropical sun , or the impervious porter , if not as
harmless as liquorice , or as purifying as sarsaparilla , emulating " coldcoloquintidaand tetra mad"P The strychnine , we are told , by an Australian , who vouchsafes an explanation , ^ oes to his country , to destroy the native dog , which is troublesome to the flock master . The boast is difficult to kill : when attacked , ho lies like death , till his aggressor is gone , and then gets up , runs away , and is ready for another fling at tho mutton , —cut and come again . Strychnino secures him . Butif not strychnino , what is it that thoy put
, into tho alo and porter for the million P Ho who can pay for Bass or Allsop , for Barclay and Perkins , is safe , because adulteration cannot equal excellence ; but how is tho cheap pot drinker to discriminate between flaw and adultoration , between mere inferiority , or want of absolute excollence , and the presenco of alien and noxious drugs P . There is but one way of testing boor : by tho taste , whoro it is really good : and by perfect
openness in tho making . But perfect openness in the making is incompatible with tho exigencies of ordinary competitive trade . Adulteration is the perquisite of competition . It is only in concert between producer and consumer , as in tho People ' s Flour Mill at Loods , that you hayo absolute socurity against factitiously high price on tho ono hand , or adulteration on tho othor ; or security , again , for tho dealer , against bud debts arid fluctuations of trade .
THE SHADOW OF THE EAGLE . Fkance , or the residue thereof , is restored once more to a normal condition , after four months experience of a beneficent dictatorship , which few have been preserved alive , or at liberty * -to enjOY with peaceful thanksgiving . The act of the 2 nd of December js now Jiistory : let history , then , be the witness , " time the Nemesis , and posterity
the judge . What is the normal condition of France ? many will ask . Is it revolution or reaction P anarchy or despotism P popular insurrection or national degradation ? Who shall say—his hand upon the open page of the last troubled years . In the costly and dazzling ceremonial of Monday last , at the Palace of the Tuileries , nothing was omitted that could lend a factitious solemnity to the occasion . The traditions were faithfully copied . The booming of cannon , the clang of cuirassiers , the bursts of martial music , the paraphernalia of gold and velvet , and embroidery , were there to celebrate the nuptials of Fraud and Force , the Salvation of Society , and the rescue
of Civilization . To exercise mercy , if not to do justice , is , it seems , the privilege of the man who waded in blood to Power through depopulated streets . ^ On the 29 th of March , France , denuded , despoiled , orphaned , is relieved from the intolerable pressure of martial law , and the herds of innocents who swarm in prisons , uncondemned , unconvicted , untried , are handed over "tothe ordinary tribunals , " only too fortunate to have escaped Lambessa or Cayenne . The Constitutional President who mutilated
the universal suffrage he had sworn to maintain , rose to be a forsworn Dictator by its restoration , duping the People by the lawless repeal of his own false act . The Dictator pauses in the search for victims to be hailed the Emperor of an amnesty ! This is to be cruel ofcly to be kind : but the cruelty and the kindness alike minister to the same falsehood—to the same oppression . Nothing was omitted—did we sayP Yes , the true glory of France , the virtue , the honour , the genius , the eloquence , the fearless independence ,
the strength of brain , and the courage of heart were conspicuous at that solemnity—by their absence ! Mercenary mutes , hireling scribes , and ignoble dependents!—such are the Senators and Deputies of France , to inaugurate a new era of prosperity . The heroes of a hundred hells , and the bullies of a hundred bagnios , garnished by a few " respectable" subserviencies from the Stock Exchange . These are the elements of your new Imperial Chivalry . Every new document of the Napoleonic rfyime exceeds its predecessor in comprehensive
mendacity . It cannot be denied that the opening speech of the President is ably and skilfully composed . It has an air of self-possession , of forgiveness , of regret , of forbearance , tranquil , dignified , and generous . It would be difficult to imagine any form of words more reassuring to hearers ignorant of the antecedents , and reckless of the consequences , than many passages of this speech . From the highest point of view this beneficent
ruler surveys the causes of success and decadence in men and governments . Even The Emfebor is not spared a passing criticism from the man who understands his age . If in 1814 parliamentary institutions wcro doomed tolerable , it was from tho too absolute exercise of power by tho Emperor . If in December , 1851 , the same parliamentary institutions wore found intolerable , it was from their abuse .
Why does Franco " remain unmoved' at the suppression of all her liberties P Because she has tho right of choosing her own government Can there possibly bo a more satisfactory reply to those who fancied that JFrance remained unmoved because she was deprived of all her powers of llfo P Then follows a perfect ganglion ot amazing voracities .
" Now tho French itation 1 ms given ( perhaps for tho first time ) to tho world tho imposing Hpectaclo of » great people voting in till liberty tho form of its Government . Thup , tho Chief of tho State , whom you have hoforo you , is truly tho expression of the populcf will . And boforo mo what do I see ? Two Chambers —tlio ono elected in virtue of tho most liberal law « xiufcing in the world ; tho other named by me , it istne , but alto independent , inasmuch as it in irromovaWe . Around mo you observe men of known patriotism rtwl merit , always ready to support mo with their coundla
Untitled Article
'¦ ¦ - ¦ f ' ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ . Apkii , 3 , 1852 . ] THE LEADER . 32 S
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), April 3, 1852, page 323, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1929/page/15/
-