On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
The Chakcei-xob of the Exchequer met this i w jth more than his accustomed air of bravado in speec soix ) etimes amounting to insolence , and more Tali ' s « sual evasiveness . denied point blank that they were there to discuss V « w Protection or Free-trade should be repealed or whetner ^ wi ie ther Ministers have fulfilled the pledges S ° Jave ' to Parliament and the country —( cries of " " they g r A and whether they have frankly stated the aQ -lusions at which they have arrived . Mr . ' Villiers said C f « enormous mischief" had been done " to the country if the conduct of the Protectionists since 1816—if that be . let the House of Commons announce that it has no * f ' dence in the men who have perpetrated this enormous Mischief . ( L ° cheers . ) Having said this , Mr . Disraeli quitted the issue ho had ' d . and digressed far backward in the history of tho last 1 ' vears to show that in the perpetration of the enormous SU \ £ viiVf the Protectionist had not been alone .
When they objected to the repeal of the Corn-laws , they d'd so on two grounds—that it would injure labour , and other important interest ; and in 1850 , he himself had " l nressly stated that it was a labourer ' s question or it was othing . He then sketched the progress of the repeal of the sugar duties , and the navigation laws , saying that the Ministers who repealed the Corn-laws did not agree with the Minister who repealed the sugar duties ; and that since 1847 they had been mainly engaged in discussing or legis-Tfttine- on distress , either in the colonial , the agricultural , or the shipping interest . And here followed a specimen of the manner in which this speech was delivered"Now let me put this fact before the house—convenient for some » o doubt to forget , but the accuracy of which will . be questioned by the experienced members of this
house , » i which it will be well tor tnose who are not experienced in this house to remember . From the time which since the repeal of the corn laws has passed down to this present moment , there has not been a single attempt made in the House of Commons to abrogate the measure of 1846 . ( "Oh , oh , " and cheers . ) Well , but one advantage of discussion in this house , I must tell to the honourable gentleman who has taken his seat to-night for the first time , is that everybody who has anything to say is entitled to offer his remarks . ( Laughter and cheers . ) I have made that statement , and the honourable gentleman who forms his opinions from the tumultuous vociferations of the platform , will find when he comes into the House
of Commons the necessity of being a little more accurate in his statements ( "Oh , oh , " and cheers . ) I repeat the statement . I repeat it on behalf of the party who have perpetrated enormous mischief . I repeat the statement , that from that moment to the present there has not been a single motion in this house—at least with the sanction of that party—there has not boon a single motion made to return to that protection which has been attacked to-night with such unnecessary vehemence . ( Cheers . ) And they had not brought forward a motion becausej as they had laid down the principle that injury to the labourer , not tho agricultural interest , should form the ground of opposition to repeal—¦
so there were no facts showing- that the working classes had been injured . " We never thought it our duty , when in opposition , to make a motion which should question the policy of the law of 184 G . " What course had been pursued with respect to the sugar duties P After they were repealed , a committee was appointed with only three Protectionist members ; and the report of that committee was so strong that Lord John Jtussell had been compelled by it to ask leave to bring in a bill to suspend the change in the duty , and prolong the protection lie hud just taken away . ( Loud cheers . ) So that neither with respect to the corn laws , or tho sugar duties , or the navigation laws , had the Protectionist party endeavoured to disturb the decision of Parliament with respect to them .
Tho fanners did not fed tho effects of repeal in 1 M 7 ; hut in 1850 the pinch came ; and Mr . Disraeli insisted , with great gravity , ( hat at that time tho leaders of the party would not lend themselves to the cry of the farmers , whodeinanded the restoration of protection , on ( lie ground that the labourers had not been injured . They told the fanners that if they were injured by five trade , they should look for redress to ' remedial legislation ; and accordingly , in 1 Hfi 1 , he had brought forward a motion respecting the incidence of taxation on tin ; cultivators of tho soil . That . "Num lost by only ten votes , mid that motion shook tho Cjiovcrniiicnt out of oHice . From this topic he whs naturall y led to defend Lord Derby , alleging the incredible Ktatement that ; " Lord Derby was at the head of a party
"i I ' arliamoiil ; , one principle of whose policy was , that it Mould ho imwiso and 'injudicious to disturb tho repeal ol the com laws" whereat , the bonne laughed heartily . When ho wan called to olliee in IMfil , lie laid it . down , that nothing could justify a return to the abrogated system , unh'KH tho labouring ' classes wen ; largely and permanently "uttering ; hut , l , o proposed a countervailing duty . "A V ( Yry moderate duty was proponed by Lord Derby ho did "ot atloinpl , to disturb the question that had once been H ( 'l . tled . ( Ironical cheering and laughter . ) I come , then " - —¦( renewed laughter . ) Kir , the policy of Lord Derby hiiH bee ,, explained by himself in bin phiee in Parliament . hat Hpeeeh remains on record , which an uninformed uneer will certainly not disturb . "
1 'ord Derby failed to form a ( Joverninonl , and Me . J / mnioli , suspending his resolution on agricultural t . axu-! '" »•» for that your , for fear of again upsetting tho Whigs , !<)(> l « ul forward to u dissolution . Hut the Whigs fell from lllt < 'nial dimensions , and wirdiod the I ' rol . eetionis ' ts to * " ' '"P . y their places , and , as men of common . spirit ., they y * " » " <> t 1-efane . Then it was tluil . they promised to make yl (> decision of tint country in the coming summer n . final ' Vision on the , disputed ' question . And in that session V . " . ' v curried thoso two highly successful measures -tho j M'htia Kill and Chancery Reform . Having sketched out , '" <> acts of the Protectionists with rospeet to the settlelu" « t of i « 4 ( . j 10 ayk (; t | wjm ( , hud boon tho conduct of Iho
sections of the opposition ? Why , that distinguished statesman and accomplished debater , Mr . Gladstone , had supported his proposition for remedial legislation , and therefore become a party to the perpetration of the enormous mischief . " In answer to those who charged us with trying to obtain , protection for the farmers under a disguise , Mr . Gladstone said , ' thought in this proposal there was an actual obstacle to the revival of protection ; ' ' that the present motion , if not perfect justice , was an approximation to justice . ' ( Loud cheers . ) ' It was said the poorrate was a tax inherited by the landed interest , and that their property having come to them on this condition , they had no claim to be relieved from the payment . How did the matter rest with resjiect to their inheritance ? They did inherit poor-rates with their land , but they also inherited with it a protective system . ( Vehement cheers from the Government side of the house . )
Again , on the sugar question , Mr . Gladstone , " the greatest light on this question , " had admitted that the sugar producers had been ground down to total ruin by the legislation of that house . ( " Hear , hear , " and loud cheers . ) And in the debate on the navigation laws , Mr . Gladstone laid on the table of the House a clause in favour of reciprocity . Therefore the followers of Sir Robert Peel concurred in the policy of the protectionist party . ( Vehement cheers . ) The speaker then made a similar point against Lord John Ilusscll , by showing that he had actually admitted the existence of agricultural distress , and not only that , but he had recommended her Majesty to sympathise with them . ( Cheers . )
I have shown you that on three great subjects of recent legislation , on which we have solicited the attention of the House with regard to the injury inflicted on particular interests , we have the authority of all the followers of Sir Robert Peel , of the late Government , and all their followers too . ( Cheers and laughter . ) I admit there is a party in this House , though it may not be a numerous one , which has been consistent ( hear , hear ) , and I admit there is one individual in this House who has been consistent from the beginning , and has a right to make the speech he has made to-night , and that is the member for Wolverhampton . ( Prolonged cheers . ) I have sat in this House for a great many years with the honourable and learned gentleman , and I had the honour and gratification of his
acquaintance many years before we either of us thought of being in this House , and I always have remarked in him two qualities for which he is distinguished—precision of thought and facility of expression . ( Derisive cheers from the Ministerialists . ) I find no fault with his speech . His speech is tho same which he has always made . ( Loud laughter . ) I do not make that observation with any feeling approaching a sneer . I mean to say he can look back to the period with self-complacency , to the time when I remember him sitting almost to the last on the benches on this side of the House , and when , with a command of language only to be obtained by the master of his subject ,
never omitting a single point , and against the prejudices of all , he denounced the system of the corn-laws . ( Loud cheers from the Opposition . ) There were no cheers then from the followers of Kir 11 . Peel . ( Cheers . ) There were no enthusiastic adherents in defunct Whig Ministers . ( Renewed cheers . ) On the contrary , the right honourable gentleman the member for Carlisle ( Sir J . Graham ) threw his broad shield over the territorial interest of England ( hear , hoar ) , and anybody , I believe , but the honourable gentleman the member for Wolverhampton would have sunk under the unequal affray . ( Cheers . ) I honour , respect , and admire his career , but 1 cannot agree to his resolution .
He could not ; and why ? Because , he believed , with all sections of the Opposition but one had acknowledged and attempted to alleviate just claims to relief . Therefore they could not accept the resolution . He defended the course pursued in proposing the amendment . When Kir Robert j ' eel took of I ice , in lH . ' i . j , ho expressed his determination not to disturb the Reform Dill , although he did not approve of it . And what would now be thought , of a parly who , supposing the followers of Sir Robert I ' eel took
olliee , should propose a resolution affirming that the Rocle .-siastioal Titles Kill was a wise , just , and henelieent measure P They had frankly slated their intentions as ( o the future ; they might have * moved the previous question ; but , neither ho nor his colleagues would consent , to be Ministers on sufi'orance : but . neither would they without a struggle yield ( o the attack lo which they had been subjected . He appealed to the new members at . tho close , forgetting he bad been insulting them at . the commencement .
I will not believe , remembering that this i « n new . Parliament , thul , those who enter it for ( he first time , have already in their consciences recorded their votes upon this question . 1 believe that they have listened in a spirit of justice and candour lo the plea . I have put , forward tonight . It , into I hose new members a third of the house on whichever nido they sit , that I appeal with eonlideuce . They have entered -many of them after much longing ( bey ha . vo just entered Unit scene to which they have looked forward with so much earnest ness , suspense , and interest .. I have no doubt , they are animated by a .
noblo ambition , and wish to realize ninny ol them lordly aspirations . 1 can say from the bottom of my heart , wherever they sit , 1 I rust they may not ho disappointed . Whalevcr adds to the world , intelligence , and eloquence ol tho House , adds also to the consideration of the ag <; Tegale , and wo nro all of us interested in maintaining- the moral and intellect mil predominance of tho llouso of Commons . I appeal to I lie generous and young , and ask them when they are a I , hint upon the threshold of Iho Senate , not to become tho tools or Iho victims of exhausted factious , or obsolete politics . ( Loud cheers . )
lie moved ( . he following ainendinenl ,, followed l > y loud cheers : - " That , this 11 ouso acknowledges , with satisfaction , that ( he elionpnesM of provisions , occasioned by recent legislation , has mainly contributed to improve tho condition and iiicrcuso tho comforts of tho working cIuhhcm : and that
unrestricted competition having been adopted , after due deliberation , as the principle of our commercial system , this House is of opinion that it is the duty of the Government unreservedly to adhere to that policy in those measures of financial " and administrative reform which , under the circumstances of the country , they may deem , it their duty to introduce . " Mr . Bright admitted the adroitness of tho Chancellor of the Exchequer , who lnitl sought to go off from the real . question , and fasten on individuals . The matter was , however , too important to be settled by recriminations . He denied that either the words , the principle , or the intent of tho resolution and
amendment , were the same , for whereas the one proclaimed Free-trade to the country and the world , the other left room for complaints of injury and injustice and claims for compensation . After citing some statistics to show the advantageous working of Free-trade , and denyingthat the agriculturists had been really injured thereby , he read a variety of extracts from hustings' speeches made by supporters of Government , in order to show how they clung to the idea of Protection . This series
of quotations , enlivened by humorous sarcasms , kept all parts of the House in continuous roars of laughter . The extracts from the Protection addresses , of members of the Government especially , told upon the House . The last was from a speech by Mr . Herries in the height of the election , when tho party was thought to be making great way . Mr . Herries , after enumerating ' the triumphs at Grantham , at Grimsby , at Boston , and at Lincoln ,
said" ' We may willingly accept the challenge and abide the issue . ' Why don't you ' accept the challenge and abide the issue ? ' ( Opposition cheers . ) Why don't you , instead of losing character with your friends in the country—why don ' t you , instead of destroying all reputation for morality ( renewed cheers )—when you have a seat on that bench , why don't you , in a manly manner , fall in defence of those out of doors , who , though mistaken , have nevertheless trusted you with a fidelity that can never be exceeded ? ( Cheers . ) Come to this side of the house , clear off your old errors , and if there be any question on which you can displace those who succeed you , do it as factiously , as earnestly , and asspeedilv as vou can . ( Hear , hear . ) JNTow ,
my object m reading these extracts was to show that it is not quite so apparent as some lion , members seem to imagine that we are all agreed on this question . ( Hoar , hear . ) I do not believe—whatever the Chancellor of tho Exchequer may have said with regard to his own opinions upon the policy of the Government—I do not believe that your followers ( addressing the Ministerialist leaders ) are free-traders ; and , not being free-traders , how can they have any confidence in you , if they are sincere and you are sincere ? ( I fear , hear . ) Or how can wo have confidence that you will guard the citadel of free trade , and carry out a free trade policy for the future , when we know that , three-fourths of those who keep vou in oflice arc as
much opposed now as ever they were to the policy which "we advocate ? (' Hear , hear , ' and cheers . ) But there aro other testimonies besides these extracts , I have here a circular which was sent to me the other day containing a long list , of subscribers to a publication of an English translation of a speech of ]\ i . Thiers . It is dated Nov . 2 , 1852 ; therefore it i . s a very modern production . Now bear in mind that this is a speech of M . Thiers , one of tho greatest " , speeches perhaps Iliat he ever made " , delivered last year in favour of protection . Wow who aro Ihe subscribers P Let nu ; observe that , when a man subscribes only for himself ho generally limits his subscription toono copy . In ( his eiise the first subscriber is 'The Naliomil Society for ( he . Protection of British Industry . ' 100 copies ( laughter ); Ibo Right 1 Ion . the Karl of Derby , 10 copies
( ' hoar , hear , ' and cheers from ( ho Opposition ) remeinbei Ihis is sine . " the ( lovernment , -came iiilo olliee ;—' -I he Kiglit Hon . ( he . Earl of !\ lalmesbury , 10 copies ; the ' Right lion . Mr . VValpole . 1 O copies . The number increases in proportion ( o the audacif y displavcd in avowing Protectionist opinions , and hence we lind Sir Eitzroy Kelly down for'JO copies . ( Laughter . ) Then , I he rule being still consistently observed , we lind the . Marquis of ( ii'iinhy subscribing for ' !¦() copies ( renewed laughter ); and then , dropping ( Iowa to the moderate s ! nle of the political thermometer , wo perceive the lion , member for North Warwickshire ( Mr . Newdegale ) subscribing lor'JO copies . Very fortunately the Chancellor of the Exchequer ' s name is not amongst them . ( ' Hear , hear , ' and Inughler . ) All those copies , however , are subscribed for . The work is a translation of
n . speocn ol' M . I luors , ( o be circulated amongst the manufacturing five traders in Ibis country . I ha \ e observed ( lint here is Iho name of Lord Derby . I find these words 'To which translation has been added that of a . nole on Russian wheat ; ' anil , considering wlint . that noble lord knew about , Russian wheat a Cow years a , go , I think almost , any book lhal , lie could road on ( lie . subject would add to his informal ion . " (( a real , laughter . ) lie then said that , a , clear and final wrdief , was ilenuuuled on the l'Voe-tradc question- -I hat , ( lie words of ( lie nnicndnieni , did not , convey this , and h : ul been
framed to lie misunderstood-- and he earnestly urged the House to put , on its books a . record which could no ! , In- mistaken , and which would have . a . beneficial •• Heel , in promoting Eroe-lrnde I hroiighoul , the world . AIIor a Iribulc to ( he lafe Sir Robert Peel , and lo his behaviour when he ( bought il . I'ij'ld . ( o change his policy , ho con ! raslod ( he departed slnl . esinan ' s conduct , with that ol" tin ; chivnlroiiM Lord Derby . lie answered Mr . Disraeli ' s allocution ( bat his party had never sought to iinsetflo Erect trade policy , by declaring flint ., lor six years , ( heir agitation had been coinpoHcdof vituperation
Untitled Article
Novembe r 27 , 1852 . ] THE LE ADER . 1127
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Nov. 27, 1852, page 1127, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1962/page/3/
-