On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
Usability constitutes a . serious grievance , rhe bill proposes to remove it , and to do Clothing more . It confers no powers on the clergy to enforce their decisions or regulabionfl id any matters : it is no interference vnjbh / tiie colonists ; it only places the clergy and tbte laity of the Church of England on the Baicne footing as Roman Catholics , IVesleyans , and other sects . v ^ SEov ia this reasonable proposition met ? What persons , above all others ^ pirt them-B ^ Lves forward to oppose it ? Who but the Nonconformists ? Mr . Hadfield tliinks it
¦ will disturb the religious peace of the colonies . 3 D »^ hd proceedings of the "Wesleyans disturb ifchltfc peace ? Mr . Miall can see a political ^ e ^ be ^ een the - Colonial Church and the Home Church which bars the liberty of the colonial clergy . What is the political tie ? Sjcurel ^' identiiy of belief ia not a " political " l&nd- ! In the coloniea the clergy are virtually a voluntary sect of Christians , professinig the tenets of the Established Church of England . It is painful to see those who < j ] aim liberty at home , who do not admit that Ti Jew should b © excluded from Parliament
the appeal to the sanctity of the law ; and the one hundred and thirty-eight voted for an ecclesiastical sin , in Order that creditors might not lose their security ! The office of the Church , they will confess , is sacred , but more sacred human , law ;• infinitely more sacred gentlemen ' s property . The hundred and thirty-eight , we fear , might call us pharisaical if we were to remind them of another
security , not a temporal one , which their respect for Mammon may place in peril . We have always said , and every day events prove the truth of our assertion , that tie religo of the Church of England is property . Here is a half-proposition to abolish simony , and it is defeated because it will destroy lay patronage , annihilate the security of t"he creditor , and violate the rights of property . Couldthere be a more full confession ? Either simony is not an ecclesiastical crime , or here are one hundred and thirty-eight participators in its guilt .
because 'he is accidentally shut oat by a statute , taking advantage of a similar accitlent and an obsolete statute , to fetter the members of a Church with whose doctrines ^ they do nbfc ' agree . Surely this is not acting Tip to that broad principle of religious liberty which would give unto others the full measure of freedom ; which it arrogates to itself . ^' -iTbo ' next opponents of the measure are Ijovv Churchmeii , like Mr . Thomas Chambers
¦ Wnd Mr . Arthur Eonnaird . Their bugbear is ^ i ^ tetett ^ They fear that the example of a free Colonial Church may lead i *> a firee iHome Church . And so it may . But is it . an ^ reason for not freeing the Colonial ^ fpp ^ Ji ^ hat the Home Church might not he . 5 - » ble to resist > good example ? Surely thej ^ oo 3 iblks lit the colonies are not to suffer ¦ because the good people of England may be -weak enough to profit by their successes ! It ; would be well if all sides of the House
looked less to consequences and ^ more to principles ; especially in this matter of religious freedom . If principles are light , con--adquences will take care of themselves . ¦ ' ¦ The other bill has been thrown out by a sttirdy majority , who set the interests of pro > - / peftjr above those of religion . As the diacussion on the Colonial Clergy Disabilities Bfll shows that the Nonconformist mind is
• not ripe for full freedom , so the debate whicli ended in the rejection of the . Simony Law J Amendment Bill proves that respectable -Englishmen can see no evil in a profitable f scandal . ! For our parts , we confess Mr . Phillimore ' s bill doea not go far enough —it ought to extend to advowsons as ! well as next' presentations . A man does ' not buy an advowson without intending to present somebody to the benefice ; and it is as much the purchase of the presentation as of the advowson . Into that
question , however , we need not go . One hundred and thirty-eight English gentlemen have declared by their votes that they do not think it wrong to sell for gold the cure of souls . They stand upon that princi p le ; their religion stands upon another . But in these matters not the apostle , one of the founders of their religion , but Simon Magus is the authority they follow . Mr . Butt actually grounded his opposition to the bill on the violation of the rights of property it would perpetrate . " Next presentations , " he said , " are subjects of mortgage and settlement !"
If you make the sale of the euro of souls unlawful , " creditors will lose their security —a . security that has the sanction of law . Think of that ! Sweep out the Temple , fkjnd th < 3 money-changers will lose their right in an established nuisance ! The House cheered
Untitled Article
RAILWAYS INT INDIA . The Government , says an old American eotton-planter residing on a farm in India , is said to be one of check , and it certainly does check every energy in the individual or advancement in the enterprise , only omitting to check dishonesty in office . That duty is reposed in everybody and therefore in
nobody . The system checks everything unofficial and nothing official . It has been a Government to check agricultural improvement , irrigation , railways , and even cotton cultivation ; though it has on \ y recently begun to check malversation of the postoffice on behalf of the Guicowar of Baroda . The Governor-General in Council sends to ab
Now there are two immediate obstructions to that extension . In the first place , there must be an immense amount of writing upon the subject ; contractors must stand by while the officials rival Gibbon in the volume of their composition , but not in closeness or pregnancy . The second and still more fatal obstruction is the bit-by-bit character of the
progress . The last gentleman , who haa returned—Mr . Jackson—was superintending the construction of a viaduct and two tunnels on four miles of railway beyond Tannah—detained in a paltry work , while he might have been superintending large tracts at the same time ; the pitiful waste of machinery on a small scrap , therefore , being the worst economy to the State and a gross injustice to the
contractor . It is not that Indian railways are likely to be unsuccessful . Everybody says they will succeed ; even the Court of Directors declare it ; and experience confirms the statement . " The little plaything near Bombay , " as our contemporary the Bombay Gazette calls it , has furnished some very instructive statistics . Before this line from Bombay to Tannah was established , it was generally considered , in
spite of English experience to the contrary , that passenger traffic would not pay the working expenses . In point of fact , however , the line , which has not yet conveyed any goods , has returned a dividend of nearly 8 per cent , per annum . Although tlie fine begins in one of the Indian capitals , it goes to a place of no particular mark—has a terminus , as it were , at St . Albans : nevertheless the statistics are satisfactory . In the eight and a half months , during which it had
been open , the number of passengers had undergone a very curious change : beginning at 22 , 000 in the half of April , it receded to 28 , 500 for the whole month of August , and then rose to 40 , 000 for October , and 61 , 000 for December ; the receipts , of course , corre * sponding . The most remarkable increase , perhaps , is that in the third-class passengers . - ¦ "l • • * d ^ A . _ A "T t 14
.. ^ ^ Beginning a , 000 , and progressively rising to 54 , 000 , it shows that the humbler class of the population were quite able to acquire the habit of railway travelling ; and thus it refutes the presumption of Indian economists , that the native Hindu would always be willing to spend time rather than money , and would slick to the indigenous and . cheap modes of transit .
Now , in England we know that after passenger traffic has been developed , goods traffic can become not less important j and there is every reason to suppose that in India , for long distances , the goods traffic would be the most important branch . To establish lines of railways would at once impart value
to long strips of land ; would , in fact , virtually call up India from its present condition of an imperfect occupancy of land by a working population , with few incentives to industry , to a genuine settlement of the land by its own population , with a better distribution for purposes of transit and commerce . In New Brunswick it has been found that to make a
road into the wild land causes settlement of the land—calls into existence thriving settlements , and draws back produce with increased wealth to the community and the State The same principle applies to India ; for if the settlers are there already , they are there without the- capital or the road ; and thus they labour under a want of that which creates
wealth in ] N cw Brunswick . The railway would carry the capital to them , and would bring back profit both to commerce aud to the State ; and this process is to be performed in a country peopled by 150 , 000 , 000 souls . Wa will venture to say that there ia no investment in the world capable of such eihaustless application of capital , with such an immense crop of profit , aa an Indian railway
England ! " a ^ ry le , lucid , and comprehensive minute , * ' on the subject of railways and their development in India , recommending specifically certain , works ; the directors in Leadenliall-street apply to the minute the terms which we have just given , and then sanction some local and fragmentary linessanctioning in Bombay , for example , " a line to Poonah , and probably to some further point in the Bombay territories , when the best route
over the Ghaut to that town has been correctly ascertained . " This is" quite in the style of the Indian Government . It has been large in conception , it lias been paltry in execution . It has comprehensive railways on paper ; and petty fragments of * lines on the ground , llussell Ellice , J . Oliphant , and other co-signatories of the Court ol Directors in London , urge , in reply to " our Governor-General in Council , " that " no time be lost " in giving to India the advantages of a ready
and speedy intercommunication , aud then they sanction a bit-by-bit railway construction , which is the very way to consume time . The same paper which contains these despatches and notifications from the Calcutta Government Gazette , brings us the information that the last English railway contractor has left India . The gentleman had come away , it is believed , as others had done before , with few inducements to return ; and what is it that drives them off their work ? " What
but the preposterous conduct of the officials , who actually bury their contemplated railways in heaps of red tape and foolscap , scrawled over with "lucid" reports and directorial sanctions on the subject ? There is now , we believe , no English contractor engaged on public works in any part of India : a fact that speaka volumes . No doubt capital could be found in India , and science could be procured from England ; but the practical experience of the contractor is required to give the railway system its buainess-liko extension .
Untitled Article
ijfo THE LEADER . [ Saturday ,
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), March 25, 1854, page 280, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2031/page/16/
-