On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
the precedents of past times , go back to the middle ages , and tell the House of precedents of Indians yrith ttieir soalpieg knives and tomaha-wks ; but as civilisation advanced , nations and Governments were endeavouring to mitigate the painful practices wifcH which war was carried on ; and he CM * . 3 VL . Gibson' ) maintained that the whole course of public trer >^<» , and municipal law in par ^ a *** state . * , k * il Deen -to utterly condemn th « -. v « tom of carrying on war by paid and hireling mercenaries , who would serve any side , and eould not be said to have any interests or sympathy in that partioular war . If it were pointed out that some power ; or some foreign nation , was willing to allow its subjects to be enlisted by this country for the purpose of making war ¦ with . Russia , and yet maintain its neutrality—which was a principle contended for by somethen he asserted that it was a dangerous principle to lay down . If this was the principle of the bill—if Russia were to hire privateers from the United States ( cheers ) , would they not be told that any country might let out its men and forces without forfeiting its neutrality , and that a British Parliament had laid down this principle ? ( Cheers . ) He had heard it said that a country may lend its troops to carry on war with another country without forfeiting its neutrality , provided there was some existing treaty antecedent to hostilities , and which had not been made with reference to the particular war then pending . If this was the case , where was the country with which this nation had sueh a treaty that it was entitled to go into that country aud raise troops for the war with Russia ? That country ought to be named , for it could be tio secret . It ought not to be difficult to be found . He said that either Government had no treaty with any such country which entitled them to enlist its subjects to carry on the war with Russia , or if there were no such country with which treaties of this kind were in existence , they were about , by ¦ this bill , to embark on a course of policy most dangerous to the future biterests of Englandto multiply wars beyond all precedent , and to involve persons who desired to be neutral , in spite of themselves , in existing hostilities . They might involve some small neutral State in . a . war with . Russia , and ¦ would incur obligations to send troops to defend thatsmall country , and have , other duties besides those of defending the Ottoman empire ; or they would have to leave that country to take care of itself , which had brought on it the indignation of the Czar fcy lending its troops to carry on the war . A . case of necessity , no doubt , was endeavoured to be made out by the noble lord who moved the second reading of the bill . He told the House that this country was engaged in a war with a great military power , anil that it had with it a just cause and the sympathy of the world , but that it wanted numbers . The noble lord appeared to forget that they had a great military ally . The noble lord forgot to mention
the Ottoman Power , with its immense forces . He ( Mr . Milner Gibson ) could not belfcve that two great countries like England and France with the force : ! of Turkey , wei ^ e reduced .-to such a state that they were dependent upon the importation of a diminutive supply of < xe , rman mercenaries . No member of Government had given a sufficient , explanation to the House to justify him in giving his support to the hill , lie believed that the measure was unsound in principle , and calculated to be iujurious to . the permanent interests of tlio country , and hud como to the deliberate conclusion that it was his duty to record his vote against this bill , and to use every parliamentary means in his power to prevent it passing into law . 11 ( Cheers front tfiv Opposition Ihi / cIus . ) Mr . J . G . Puiu-imork opposed the bill .
Mr . Sidney HEiWEnx replied to Mr- Gibson , and jxistiflcd the throat of resignation . Lord Stanley thought it absurd that tlvo population of twenty-six millions could bo exhausted by the enlistment of 200 , 000 men . If tho British recruits were too young-, the Germans—the disbanded soldiers whom the Government hoped to obtain—would be too old . As for the threatened resignation , he wondered at that , from a Government which had calmly borne tho loss of the lleform Bill and tho Kducutipn Bill . Tho bill was then supported by SirJ . iFiTKGBitA ^ D . Tjord Pauwskston made an elaborate defence .
Mr . DisjiAiiLi thon urged thes inutUUy of the measure as tlio support was not wanted . Tho nobio lord appeared to forget the alliance with tho greatest military nation in the world . Ho then paid a considerable tributo to tho French and to their Emperor , and explained that tho English troops did not objoofc to fight with foreigners , but they did object to fight with mero mercenaries . Ho then road various extracts from tho Duke of Wellington ' s despatchep , for tlio purpose of showing how uhoIosh mere foreign recruits wore . Tho French had n foreign logion in tho Crimea , ono member of which deserted to tho cnomy , and , by hia information , occasioned tho buttlo of Inkcriuiui . Tho hou . gentleman concluded by saying : —
" Siiicu tho expedition iitfainut Sicily by tho Allioliiuns , 1 do not know that t . lwro over van an expedition from which no much was uxpeoti-i . l , or upon which no much wn-fl Ntaked . There in , unhappily , in thu oominvnecmont . of both tliomi expedition * , l , in » much niinilarity . Tho schoiricrH worn HiTogiuit , boastful , and ovcr-Binijjjuine . Thoro were too mimy gouc-mlrf iu the Sicilian
expedition—there -was too little cavalry . Tfcore was a winter campaign , and there was no reserve- When gentlemen go into the country in a few days—I understand we axo . to Tbe absent a m . Fntn—there may be moments when the ha **" exhausted , and when tbere "may 'be a froo * f fowjK )—I recommend gentlemen to refresh their memory , by turning- to the pages of Thncydides . I recommend them to read the despatch of Nicias to the Athenian Assembly , when he says , ' Men of Athens , I know that you do not like to hear the truth , but understand this—yon sent me out to "be a besieger , but , lo ! I am
besieged . ' Jiow , sir , we know what was tlie end of the Sicilian expedition . May that Divine Providence that has "watched over the inviolate island of the sage and the free , save us from a similar conclusion ! But , at least , let us do now what the Athenians did even in their proud despair . They sacrificed to tlie gods , and appealed to the energies of their eountrymen . We are at a moment not , I believe , of equal danger—we are in a situation which I pray may end in triumph , but still a situation of doubt , of terrible anxiety , even of angnishwe bring in a bill in order to enlist foreign mercenaries to vindicate the fortunes of England . " ( Loud cheers . ")
After some feeble opposition from Mr . Mr / Nxz and Mr . ]> EEX ) E 3 , Lord John Hussein reviewed , in a somewhat angry manner , the arguments of the Opposition , and complained bitterly of the "ingenious" manner in whieh Mr . Disraeli had misquoted the Duke of Wellington , He then made more quotations which were intended to counterbalance the opinions of the I > uke expressed in the former selection . He tlien frankly admitted that the Government had been occasionally mistaken , but expressed his conviction of ultimate success . - "SThe House then divided , when there appeared , for the amendment , 202 ; against it , 241 ; majority against it , 39 . The bill was then read a second time , and committee fixed for the following day . The discussion was resumed on Wednesday .
Mr . LiDr > j 5 L , r , contrived , at great length , to > say nothing which had 3 iot been said before against the bill— -with the exception that Germans had brought cholera into Liverpool on their way as emigrants to Canada . Mr . liicu had felt bound to give his vote in favour of the bill , blithe must carefully guard himself against being supposed to have supported the measure merely because it went to the employment of mercenary troops . Had he placed entire confidence in the explanation of the objects of the measure that
was given by the Secretary-at- War , he would ha , rdly have been prepared to vote in its favour . He considered that the Government were tongue-tied , but he voted for their measure to show that he had faith . As an instance of having faith , the lion , gentleman further explained that every military office in the Ministry should be filled by a Minister who had a majority of public support , and that was not the case with a single Minister in any way related to the War Department . He thought every Minister should change his department with a colleague .
Mr . DnupotOND hastened to save Ministers from their friends . He could not help suspecting that the bill was , in Newmarket language , " a dark horse "that all was not fair and above board—that some ulterior measure was concealed behind it . He was not opposed to the employment of foreign auxiliaries with the consent of their sovereigns , but lie had no faith in the fidelity of men whose oath of allegiance would bo sworn to a shilling a da 3 . He suggested that the measure should bo postponed till after tho recess . Sir William Yebner and Mr . Otwat opposed the bill .
Mr * \ 7 rriTRSii > K further opposed it in a . speech which was characterised by Mr . Sidney Herukkt , who replied , as one of those forensic displays with which Mr . Whitcside knew so well how to create an effect for the moment . Neither arguments contained any new important points . Mr . CouniJN said"Although I protested against sending out our men to % ht tho buttles of Europe upon land , although I protested against tho objects of our continental policy in fighting " those battles , and although I think tliat tho expedition to the Crimon is about tho rashost of any of -which an account is to bo found in our muialn —and that is Raying a great deal—yet tho nation having 1 willed Hint ! 5 () , 00 O of our fellow-countrymen . should
go 1100 U miles oil" to iiwudu tho empire of Uunsiu , 1 nay that , the nation is bmuul to unsitit thowe bravo men in the Crimea . But if you wore to put it to our euuutryuien who aro rotting in nu « h niiHory on tho heights of Kalaklava , -what -would they nay of tho aid you propone to Hum ! t . honi' ( Would they auk for mendicant , ( iurnittiia to roscuo Ilium from their present diilkultios ? No ! thoy would auk for thoir own countryman , and 1 cannot , help thinking that thin proposal , among other dlamlvun-Lutfuri , will lie Jiooi'ptod an no compliment by thorn ) man whom you aro proponing t , o norvo . But , beyond thin , it < ip |> oarti to ini ! Unit you aro , in tho face of tho world , holding out ii H » jj ; na . l of UirtLnwn , hulujj ; in . Jlirnui jxiiipc . rui , proclaiming a Horl of national bankruptcy in moil and in courage , in proponing , in the flrwt year of tho war , to go and raiae vecruita iiuiudk fwruiimeri } . "
Hetfiought the measure looked as if fervour for the war was failing , ana asked , if troops were vranted , where was the reserve of ¦ which . Government talked . " The emigration from Germany to the United States consists generally of grown-up men and women with their families , of communities of labourers carrying with them their clergyman and their doctor , -who have booked themselves upon the Rhine for Cincinnati or Buffalo , or Borne other place in the far West . Can anything be so puerile as to dream of intercepting these people , of stopping them on their way through England , and inducin g "them to go to Sebastopol ? It appears to me that even df you pass this bill there is no guarantee whatever that
you are going to get the men whom you want to enlist - but I join with the hon . gentlemen who oppose this measure npon moral grounds , eve : n if you do succeed in . carrying it into effect . What is it ? The opinion of most people would sanctify the practice of war , and make the profession of arms one of the most honourable pursuits of man . What is the reason of this ? Why , it is assumed that men iight for a cause , that tiiey are actuated by love of home , devotion to the country , or attachment to a sovereign ; these are the sentiments that hallow the pursuit of arms . But what motive have these men . whom you endeavouT to hire oat of the back slums of the towns of Germany ? They can have no pretentions to fighting from any moral motive whatever ;
they are deprived of every ground upon which you can justify war , and , as they want the motives whicli I have described , there is just the difference between them and an ordinary soldier fighting for his country that there is between a hero and a cut - throat . It is wholesale assassination to employ them . Not to go oveT the arguments which have been used so abundantly by other people , I will only ask whether yon are really gomg to fight the Emperor of Russia , with his 800 , 000 armed men , upon his own shores , when you say you are obliged to seek help from abroad before you have hardly . got into the fray ? 1 think , the moment you have landed an armed force in an empire like Jiussia , 3000 miles off , you must be assured that , unless you are
prepared to put forth energy such as this country never put forth before , you must have taken a step wliich will lead inevitably to disaster and disgrace . Was it a light thing to land such a force upon the shores of an empire like Russia ? There is no other country the territory of which it would be so difficult to invade aud occupy permanently . I once used a phrase which has been a good deal abused , and has caused much amusement , and I dare say will do so again . I was speaking at a public meeting in 1849 of those who threatened us with an attack from Russia , and my -words were these : —If Russia were to attack England or the United States , or any other great maritime Power , they would fall upon her like a thunderbolt , and crumple her ur > in her own
dominions by means of their shipping . Have we not done so by means of our shipping ? The moment oui ships appeared did not the fleets of Russia disappear 'i Bat if you attem . pt to fig-ht Russia on land , you must be prepared for a very different stale of things from that which you contemplated , and it its reducing your efforts to a most disproportionate proportion . — -it is using the strength of a dyvarffor doing the work of ten giants—to peddle over your Foreign Enlistment Bill to enable you to go abi'oad and get aid to carry on the war . This House is in danger of losing its character for independence , and for being tho real great council of the
nation , if it permits itwelf to be sent back without one word having boon said with regard to the prospects and the conduct of tho war . If I may judge from the communicutionu I get from Robastopol , you cannot bo doing n greater act of kindiuws to tho army than entering into a discussion of that question , and , at all events , they will have the gratification which , from the course our delbatcB have hitherto taken , they ean hardly have now , of knowing that tho roprescntativoM of Kii ^ lund luivo not separated without giving- . some attention to tlie unparallolfld miseries under which they aro now literally rotting . "
Jjord John IIusstxi ^ was very much surprised that tho same arguments , which had boon so often disproved , should still bo urgod in opposition to the bill . He repeated that many measures had been taken besides tho contemplated Poreign Enlistment ' Since tho landing in tlie Crimea , ll , » 00 more incn had been sent as reinforcements . Other regiments in Mediterranean garrisons would follow , and thoir place would bo supplied l > y militia . Ijord C . Hamilton ssiiu , tho objection was , not that this was tho only iuouau . ro proposed by tlio Government , but that it should liavu boon concculod till tho last moment . Mr . Danijy HuYMOim jihIumI ,
" While tliey were b «« i ^ i » fj , or rat liur only half lm-Nicpnng , SuliiiNtopol , what , wan thi . s lleul of fifty-four Hhijia-of-wur < loi » £ which c-onvuyo'I t-hoir army wckmh this aoa , ami which wnn prmiounwd <> n « of the gr «» tOHl naval annairiouLM thai . i-v < ir appeared upon the wiivoh V At . thiri very nioiiu-iit Ilieru tvhn ovury kind of produce going iu and nut . <>' " « vory llumiiiui port , in tint Muck Sou , uxwpt that , kind which w « wanted , viz ., broad-Htidlk Mo ha . l lioon informed l . y Knglmh tfoiu . lomen who had rxiublinhmoDlH at . ports in thu Mack -Son that « : ar « rood wre yoing mil of tlio « e jiortw , aiul tluvt in rutvirn
Untitled Article
December 23 , 1854 . ] THE LEADER . 1203
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Dec. 23, 1854, page 1203, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2070/page/3/
-