On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
of Oude should be guaranteed in possession of their estates and rewarded , that actual murderers should be excluded from mercy , that persons of all classes making their submission early should be secure of "life and honour , " " that those who aided 'the Government would be entitled to its superior consideration , and that , with certain , exceptions , the territory was conditionally confiscated , or Tather held in pledge , until the authority of the British
Commissioner had been completely re-established , and due investigation made into the armies of the rebellion . "We dare not be so rapid in our verdicts as Lord Eiii / ENBonoTTGH , and are therefore unable for the present to weigh every point in this manifesto ; our information , to say the truth , is vague and unsatisfactory . It may prove that the menace of confiscation was impolitic , or it may be shown that Lord Canning followed the wisest course open to him . That is a problem not yet to be solved by political critics at home . But there are
certain known facts which may help us to a conclusion . In the first place , a number of the great landowners in Oude are not of that class for whom any appeal can legitimately be made on . the ground of hereditary possession . They had acquired their estates at a period compai'atively recent by the plunder and murder of their weaker neighbours , and , as Colonel Sleemait ascertained , these were the favourites and most strenuous adherents of the dethroned dynasty . The assumption of the country by Lord Baleodsie , and the exaction of arrears from the territorial
lords , arrayed against us a large proportion of that powerful order , and this hostility was of course aggravated when the Governor-Oeneral proposed to supersede the talookdar "by the village system . The scheme was never very largely developed , and Lord Cak-UiNG , upon his accession to the administration of India , set his face against it . It was not until after the revolt , with its accumulation of horrors and atrocities , that he believed liimself entitled to resume for the
Government the disposition of the land— -a privilege which , we are convinced , lie never intended to employ to any oppressive extent . Why , however , did he send home without explanation a document so easy to misinterpret and so sure to be attacked ? This , we think , was a blamable omission . "We are in a position to speak of Lord Oanning with candour and independence , "We have not at all times approved his policy . At the commencement of the mutiny he
was demonstrably wanting in foresight ; lie dealt perversely with the suggestions of men who were competent to instruct him ; he confounded the English with the native press ; he appeared to parade his contempt of the European community ; . he contracted a fatal habit of undertaking too much , and was dissatisfied if , in addition to being his own council , he was not also his own clerk ; but we are forced to say that he met the appalling difficulties of his situation with cool
and steady courage , and it is a testimony to his consistent calmness that those who once inveighed against his clemency at present denounce his rigour . He has kept an even course , and has therefore offended extreme opinions on both sides . So far as to Lord Canning . Taken for all in all , his policy has been sound , and its wisdom has been
evidenced by its success . To Lord Ellenbohougui no such congratulations apply . Ho came into office when the worst of the crisis had passed ; ho found Lord Canning with the w » ost delicate and complex of all responsibilities upon lua hands —that of following with vigorous and cautious acts of administrative policy the subsidonce of the insurrection , Sir Ooi , in Campbei ^ i , and his
brigadiers were beating the rebels . The Governor-General was taking charge of the rescued provinces . He issued a Proclamation designed to quell the turbulent and win over the timid , and , whatever flaw that document may contain , Lord Canning neither did , nor could do , anything so rash or perilous as was done—and done in good faith , no doubtby the Earl of EiiLenborough . His despatch to Lord Canning was an edict , and a propensity to edicts has been his official ruin . It was a mistake to impose a check so abrupt upon the administration of the
Governor-General , who naight have been presumed to act with full knowledge of the circumstances , and of the influence likely to be exerted by his Proclamation . But to pass the " secret " despatch from hand to hand , to raise a discussion upon it , to transmit a copy to Mr . Joek Bbight . and to announce emphatically in Parliament . that Lord Canning had been visited with an . official censure , was a complicated act of -weakness aud folly committed by Lord Elie ^ bobotjgh : in common with the other members of the Cabinet . It was the President of the Board of Control who
made himself responsible for publishing the state-paper in which he went far in an argument to justify the Oude rebellion and exalt it as a patriotic war ; but Mr . Pisuaeli declared from his place on the Treasury bench that the CAtfNrN'G Proclamation was by him , and by his colleagues , " condemned ia every sense , " so that , straightforward , manly , and generous as the . conduct of Lord Ellenboeottgh has been , w . e cannot think that he has exonerated the rest of the Government .
There are grounds for a parliamentary vote of reprobation ; but it must be morbifying to public opinion in a constitutional country to observe the frenzy of selfish excitement into which the expectant factious are thrown , when , through a gap in the Indian policy of the Ministers , they perceive a chaiice of rushing back to office . This has been the discreditable aspect of the week ' s discussiou , and we are sorry to believe that Mr . Oahdwejx went to Cambridge House to enrol himself
among the men whose desperate fidelity to Lord Palmehston far surpasses their loyalty to any public interest or political principle . This we say with the less reserve , and with the more pain , inasmuch as , whether with or without a dissolution of Parliament , a new Government is all but inevitable—as the Daily News has explained—within the next few mouths . It is impossible that Lord Debby can long cling to office at the head of a minority , scarcely numbering more than
one-third of the House of Commons , and at variance with the mivjority on so many important questions . ¥ e have a Premier who admitted to Mr . SrootfEB that Maynooth had failed , yet declined to support his motion for inquiry ; who objected to Mr . Loo ice Kisra's County Franchise Bill , yet instructed his lieutenants in the Lower House not to divido against it ; who is a champion of church rates , and sees the majority led by Sir Jomsr Tbela . wn : t ; who considers marriage with a deceased wife ' s sister incestuous , and cannot prevent the second
reading of Viscount Buiiy's bill ; who believes that the Legislature will be unchristianized by the admission of a Jew , and is to meet Baron Hotiisguild in conference , under the compulsion of a parliamentary vote ; and who , having abandonod his India Bill , abandons his India Minister . "What is the result , but that both Houses are stultified , and that , while factions are gravitating , now to Xord Paimbrston , now to Lord John Russell , all possibility of honest and effective legislation is destroyed ? India lins been totally sacrificed in the midst of tlieae party squabble-a , tlicao threats of consuro ,
these evolutions of political leaders , these Cambridge Hlouse gatherings , these calcul ations by Sir "William Joliefe and Sir William Blayteb , these doubts of the Liberals whether they shall wear the London or Tiverton cockade .
Untitled Article
THE INDEPENDENT LIBERAL PARTY . A hundred and twentt members of the House of Commons consider themselves to be sufficientl y agreed upon the principles of a Liberal policy to cohere as an independeiit party . They now understand , we should imagine , of what importance it is to . them that their strength and unity should be manifested . Already , the demonstration thev have made has pro&itced a visible impression in and out of -Parliament . The Conservative prints insinuate the most flattering appeals to the Hundred and Twenty not to throw away their support upon the Whigs . The Whig organs point to the . process of
. Liberal organization as a sign that , if there be one growing party in the House of Commons it is not the Conservative . And tlie Hundred and Twenty -well know that not only the present hut any future Cabinet must depend upon them if only they have a common basis , an intelligent and indefinite course of action , and such a systematic method of representing themselves and public opinion as will not only give them weight m the House , but render them the nucleus of Liberalism throughout , the country . Allowing the Conservatives two hundred and seventy votes in the Commons , the Liberals
number three hundred and ninety . From the latter take the hundred and twenty now endeavouring to organize themselves , and resolved , as they declare , to insist upon , a Government of progress and sincerity , and what is left to the Whigs ? Two km . dred and sixty-five votes—a combination which , without the aid of the hundred and twenty who enrol themselves as independent members , the Conservatives might at airy time overthrow . There is no necessity for drilling- a Brigade or a Brass Baud to exercise a domineering terrorism over Ministers by threatening to leave them in a minority whenever a Liberal proposal is refused , hut we do say
¦ with Mr . Headlam that the party has been unfairly treated , while we go beyond him in saying , that the par ty deserves what it has suffered . Even now public opinion is so i-ncredulous of any union or persistency among the Liberal members of the House of Commons , that in many quarters it is whispered that Mr . Headlam's complaint was tlie cry of a stormy petrel , and that independent legislators have been fluttered by the fear of a dissolution . And -well may they dread to go before their
constituents with an account of their good and evil works since the last general election . Who of the new men has distinguished himself ? Where arc all the promises , prophecies , and hopes that , in ] $ 37 , showered from the hustings ? Where is the organization that was predicted ? and what have the Liberals done for themselves or the principles Ihcy are ^ supposed to represent ? They arc only now beginning to remember that they form tlie materials of an influential party , and they might do something for their cause if they were not jealous , divided , and indifferent .
At the first meeting of the independent members resolutions were carried declaratory of their intention not to support any future Government established on the narrow Whig basis . r It was proposed to vote that " inore earnest zeal" in favour of Reform must be displayed by the next Cabinet appealing to the confidence of the Liberal parly ; but the word " more , " upon a motion to that cll ' cct , was struck out , and a hundred and twenty members of the House of Commons thus declared unanimously that , no liberal zeal whatever had been exhibited bj Lord Pahncrston or Lord John Russell . This important resolution— "That no future Government will bo woTthy of support which does not
manifest earnest zeal and sincerity in promoting measures of improvement and reform" — might operate as a warning ; and stimulus to the chick of the Opposition , could they bo , convinced tlmt ( lie movement is not a mere ' flash in the pan—could they see a party organizing and a policy developed by the independent Liberals—could they sec ihem communicating directly and regularly with the public , as other sections do , -with far more confidence in themselves , though with far inferior claims to popularity . What does Mr . J . Clay confess ? That lie and his friends have hitherto pursued a course which has rendered them " useless m the Houso of Commons , " and . must shortly
Untitled Article
468 THE LEABEB . [ Ko . 425 , May 15 , 1858 .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 15, 1858, page 468, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2242/page/12/
-