On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
PARLIAMENT.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
TTJRIDAY night , by consent , is allowed to be trie Ministerial night . X . Important Government business is transacted ; important and sometimes inconvenient , questions are either answered frankly- or adroitly evaded . Friday last . was an example of the latter proceeding . Twenty-one questions were asked by twenty-one different members , each question embracing a new and a widely differing topic . The most important of the night was that put by Mi \ Kingiake , relative to the rumours , of continued naval and military preparations on the part of the French Emperor . Lord J . IJussell explained the present relations between England and France , which were in the highest degree satisfactory , and saw no reason for feeling alarm or jealousy at the naval or military activity of the French Emperor . Some explanations were elicited from Sir C . Wood relative to Indian affairs . The Newspaper Bill passed through Committee .
On Monday the Lord Chancexlor laid on the table a Bill relating to joint stock companies , for the ostensible object of curing the glaring defects of the Winding-up Acts . From the few introductory words , it is doubtful whether the noble and learned lord ^ s Bill is likely to deal effectually with the winding-up scandal as it exists ; lawyers' Acts of Parliaments are proverbially inefficient ^ for dealing with purely commercial questions . Lord Brougham , in making a proformd- ' motion relative to County Courts , took occasion to point out the admirable working of these tribunals , and threw out a suggestion for extending their jurisdiction to sums above £ 50 . In reply to a question , the Earl of IJipon referred to the patriotic oiler of the services of the volunteers , and expressed ahope that in time the new force would become a permanent institution of the country .
The principle of the Volunteer movement was , that it should be self-. supportiug , and independent of Government aid . Any departure irom this principle , by seeking Government assistance , would alter the character of the body , and impair its utility ; The numbers were now between seventy thousand and eighty thousand ,, and increasing daily . —Tuesday ' s discussions were of more than ordinary importance . Lord LYNDHtrRST drew attention to the mass of Bills just introduced by the Lord Cha \ n-celxor for the consolidation of the Criminal law , and pointed but one case in ' which / , great carelessness was apparent in drawing at least one of the Bills . The Lord Chancellor was obliged to confess that he-had not read the Bills fully , only partially , but would look further into the matter . The Earl of Derby then brought oil that endless scandal , the
disturbances at S $ . George ' s-in-the-East .. After a . severe censure on the author of these disturbances , the noble lord contended that scenes so disgraceful to religion could not be permitted to continue , aud desired : to he informed whether Government was willing to apply to Parliament for further powers to suppress them . Earl Granvixle was in accord with Lord Derby in his censure on the clergyman on whom wag to be charged these scandalous occurrences . He thought , however , the law was sufficiently strong , admnistered by magistrates , assisted by the police , to deal with offenders . Lord Brougham , who appeared to sympathise more openly with tlie clerical than with the lay offender , hoped the Bishop would shut up the church if mo other means were found sufficient to quell the Sunday outrages . The Bishop of London tet
intimated that this step had already been resord o and found absolutely inefficient , His own notion of settling the question was for both parties to leave the matter in his hands , and to agree to abide by his decision . With this curious proposition the discussion dropped . \ Savoy question , which is beginning to assume serious and important proportions , and to disclose hitherto unsuspected elements of European difficulty , was brought on by the Marquis of Normanby , who reviewed the unsatisfactory position of affairs , and the dubious conduct of France and Sardinia respecting Savoy and Nice . He called on the House to resist the new and dangerous doctrine that " a people , on the ground of nationality and speaking the same language , should be entitled to transfer their allegiance from one sovereign to another . "
Earl Gbanville had no positive assurance to give that the French Emperor did not contemplate the absorption of Savoy and Nice . The presumption , however , was on the other side ; but assuming that France had a treaty with Sardinia for the surrender of a portion of h . er territories as a gtiicltpro quo for services rendered , then the French Emperor would stand disgraced before the world as a despiser of promises , and as one whose word was unworthy of credit Earl Grey urged Government to ask the French Emporor for a positive disavowal of tho designs imputed to him . The Earl of Sixajttebbury considered the imputed designs of the French Emperor so pregnant with future danger to the peace and welfare , hot pf this country only , but of Europe , that he hoped both . Houses of Parliament and the people of England would with one voice announce their disapproval ; also that Sardinia would resist
dismemberment by force of arms . This - country had long protested against the traffic in human flesh ; it was proper , therefore , that it should also protest against this new traffic in human rights , The Duke of Newcastle throw oil on the troubled waters , by deprecating the warmth of Lord Siiaftes-BUity , which ho said was calculated to defeat tho peaceable solution of this difficult ' question . Gorennnent had aono aH it could do "by representations to avert tho threatened annexation , and would continue in that course , without , however ; contemplating a possible oasus belli . Lord Brovghaai was as much opposed to the annexation as any noble lorfl > but ho hoped Lord Normalmy ' s proposition for an address to tho Queen On tho question of the assumed absorption of Savoy nnd Nice by Franco would Jiot bo pressed to a division , as it might , fironx such a course , appear that thero was a difference of opinion >» tho house , wherons every noble
lord entertained the same view of . it . The Earl of Derby , with great force , remarked that if this alleged proceeding were carried out , the parties who would most suffer would be the French Emperor and the King of Sardinia ; the first , for having belied all his protestations of disintei'estecl views in his interference in the affairs-of Italy , and the other for having made a venal bargain for selfish purposes . Lord Stxtart de Redcxiffe agreed with ' . Lord Derby , and gave it as his opinion , if the absorption took place , that the basis of future war among European powers would have been laid . The Marquis of Normanby , satisfied with the expression of opinion that had been elicited , withdrew his motion . The disappointment on Monday was great and general , in consequence of the indisposition of the Chancellor of the Exchequer rendering it necessary to postpone his Financial Statement until Friday . In reply to Mr . Btng , who wished to know whether Government intended to take further steps to suppress the Sunday rioting at St . George ' s in the East—Sir Gr . C . Lewis did not consider the disturbances as outrages , and significantly added that he regretted the rector , Bryan King , should persist in questionable ceremonies and acts which were , in truth ,, the origin of the existing dissatisfaction and disturbances . The Police Commissioners , he considered , had made suitable arrangements calculated to prevent a positive bireach of the peace . Several bills were moved a stage , and the House broke up at an early hour . —On Tuesday , Lord J . Russell , in reply to a question , detailed the plan submitted by the English Government to France and Austria for the settlement of the Italian difficulty . As the answers of all the great . Powers had not yet been received , it would not- be expedient to lay the papers at that moment on the table . His Lordship , however , felt . great hopes that the settlement of the difficulty was not far distant . Lord J . Manners asked leave to bring in a Bill to close the Divorce Courts to the public * on the ground that the prurient disclosures affected public morality . Mr . E . James opposed the Bill , on the ground that the question had already been entertained and decided in the negative . Mr . Roebuck pungently remarked that he agreed with Swift in thinking that the " nicest persons had always the nastiest ideas . " He should oppose the motion mainly on the ground that . if the Court was closed the people would be shut out from a . great theatre , where morality was taught . Lord R . Cecil was on the side of Lord J . Manners , Mr . Malins and Mr . Macatjlay on the other . .. Sir G . C . Lewis would oppose the Bill because it selected a particular Court , and was not sufficiently general in its application . The Bill was lost , on a division , by 268 to 83 . Several Bills were introduced . —Wednesday was remarkable for being tlie first " field day , " on-which both parties mustered nearly their respective strengths . It was not , however , openly stated that the question was / to be a party affair , though it was covertly understood , as the "ins" took one side and the " outs " the other , that it was as closely to approximate to a " pitched " battle as could be effected without being really of that significant character . The question was the Abolition of Church Rates . A large number of petitions heralded the introduction of the Bill by Sir John Trelawny . The main argument of the hdn . baronet was , tliafc the rate had been generally condemned not only by dissenters , but by members of the Church of England , as was evidenced by the nuniber of petitions on the subjeet . The voluntary principle would be an efficient substitute for a compulsory rate , and by its adoption a great cause of strife would be abolished . Lord Robert Montague , by way of throwing out the Bill , moved that it be read that day six months . The question , he contended , was no longer one of conscience . The , dissenters had thrown off the mask , and now openly declared that this Bill was another step toward effecting the severance of Church and State . Sir G . C . Lewis would vote in favour of the Bill . Public opinion had changed , and this was the best excuse which could be alleged for change of opinion on the part of public men . Pew , rents were a kind of Church rates , and a proper substitute for them . Mr . Ker Seymour believed that the majority , of the Church of England supporters were opposed to tho abolition of Church rates , and especially to the substitution of pew rents for the impost , ^ Mr . Disraeli objected to the measure on the ground of its centralizing character , ft was another blow at localgovex-nmont , and another addition to that central power to , wh ^ ch legislation of late yoars ' appeared to tend . Ho did not think that the opposition to Church rates was based on conscientious scruples , Ho believed the Bill was calculated to strike a blow at a constitutional institution , and to substitute a mere speculative theory . The real question , though not then before the House , was whether there should bo an Established Church at all . Lord Fermoy , with somewhat o / Hibernian warmth of imagination , deolared that if Church rates were abolished , it would get rid of contests and heartburnings in England , just as it had done in Ireland . Mr . Paoke and Mr . Hubbard wore against , Mir . Thomson for the Bill , and on a division it was ordered to bo read a second thno , by 203 to 284 . On Thursday night L . ortf PALMERSTOjsr said that ho hoped if his right hon , friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer had not sufficiently recovered his strength to bo enabled to enter on his financial statement , which must necessarily bo of considerable length , tomorrow evening , that the llouse would indulge himjby allowing ifcsjwstponoment until Monday . However , if the Chancellor of tho Iyxohequor was not able to , bring- the budget forward to-morrow evening * , las noble friend the Secretary for Foreign Affairs would lay on tho table tho commeroinl treaty with France . Wo have'just room to notice also , that Sir F . Kelly moved for leave to bring in a bill for the prevention of bribery , and to nmend tho Corrupt Practices Prevention Aqts , 1854 .
Untitled Article
146 The Leader and Saturday Analyst . [ Feb . 11 , 1 S 60 .
Parliament.
PARLIAMENT .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Feb. 11, 1860, page 146, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2333/page/22/
-