On this page
- Departments (2)
-
Text (5)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
THE PEELITES.
-
DEBTORS AND qUEDITORS.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
minds the late great Strike sug-gested dyspeptic dreams of a . servile war between labour and capital . Events have shown our social balance top good to be-easily disturbed , even by so large a body of men being thrown hungry and angry upon the streets of London . But when ¦ we hear of such suflferiogs as those practised in the factories , how -4 ? an we wonder at any efforts , however violent or misjudged , to restrain such inhumanity ? There was a time when just and wise guilds arbitrated on such matters , and redressed every grievance ; but trade has grown too wide for guilds , and mutual forbearance aud rself-restramt are novir pur only safety .
It should humble our national pride to think that now , in this vaunting age , when eonarnerce teems with invention and life , when our sails are on every sea , and our power and wealth is a proverb all over the g lobe ; now that education is getting universal and religion increasing ; now that our merchants are princes and our traders nobles , that we should have reached that alarming pitch of commercial immorality that it is all but impossible to obtain pure and real the simplest necessaries of life , that new inventions should be liable to be destroyed by ignorant workmen , that thousands of children should be slowly put to death annually in our factories , that that code of lies called " Tricks of trade" should form part of every commercial man ' s education and creed , that unchecked forgeries should be common , that nothing sold should be quite what it seems , —that greediness , fraud , and deception should be still so paramount wherever trade sets up her noisy booths , in a word that CJbeshams should be so few and J > ean Pauls so numerous . ;
Untitled Article
IT is probable that ere many years the Peelites will be placed at the head of the nation ' s affairs . Well , therefore , is it far . us to know what they are , and what we have to expect from them . They resemble little him from whom they have their name j they are neither so thoroughly English , nor so persistent and practical . Foreign writers have called them the doctrinaires of England . ; but this is scarcely accurate . Gttizot , and other statesmen mi ranee of the same stamp , are cold , pedantic dogmatists ; , and it would be far more correct to designate Whigs of the Lord John Rxtsseli . school doctrinaires than the Peelites . The latter are men of honour and of principle , who are less dominated by ideas than by aspirings . Their distinctive feature is a certain , indolent catholicity . They have not strong sympathy with the people ; , but neither have they the Whig contempt for the people , nor the Whig exclusiveness .
Their cardinal defect is a want of energy . The Tories are often unscrupulous ; the Whigs are not unscrupulous / but they are factious , intriguing , arrogant , vindictive . The fault of the Peelites is that they are too scrupulous ; that they doubfc and hesitate when they should boldly . act . They have some of the hi g h qualities , some of the noble chivalry of the Girondists , with the same overstrained delicacy and fatal vacillation . With the instinct of exalted right , they have not the courage of justice ; hence , though they will not practise corruption , they will tolerate it . To succeed in politics men must be thorough politicians . The leading Whigs may not be our greatest statesmen , but they are our most thorough politicians . In talent , Lord Palmejiston and Lord John Rtbskuc , do not greatly rise above mediocrity , but they are intensely politicians ; their heart never wanders from the political field , the political arena , Can the same thing , be said of the Tory leaders ? And would it not be a mocketo it of the Peelites ?
ry say The dream of the Peelites is the revival of niedisevalism through the renewed action of the Church . But they display ho vigour in the realisation of their dream . They assume the infallibility of the Church , yet shrink from asserting- the whole of the Church's authority . B ehind the age in their childish Traoijarianisrn , they are yet before it in tlieir general scheme of a Commonwealth ; indeed , they are the only political party with tlie general scheme of a Commonwealth at all . For every other political party , what are politics , but haphazard , har id-to-mouth empiricism ? To view the Sfcute as a city of CJoDi which every pious , virtuous , and patriotic soul should help in building , this ia familiar enough to the Germain mind ; but the average English mind would reject -it as an absurdity , . Now , the Peelitea have done a signal service in giving us , however
imlife with an array of arid philosophical [ propositions ^ cannot forget its historical development . But the historical development should not be compelled to depend on the coarse pressure of material necessity , identifying abstractions with idealisms , the English abhor the latter quite as much as the former , and herein they are guilty of a most deplorable blunder . Hfofcliing- but more transcendent and . triumphant idealism is needed to make the English who are so strong , so laborious , so valiant ; and so truthful * unrivalled among modern nations . Now , if the Peelites were not politicians at all , if they were simply students—and there is a good deal of the scholar ' s refinehient iii them , with , alas ! too much of the scholar ' s feebleness—they would have shown themselves as England's faithful Mends , by preaching , though in antiquated and theologicalfashion , the regeneration of England into a catholic Commonwealth . What they have preached they will strive to incarnate . They may not achieve much , but at least they will render politics broader , richer , deeper , more poetic . In a nation culture cannot be a substitute for heroism , but culture is nearer heroism than that idiotic prose which in England we are so fond of dignifying with the name of common sense ; Revolutions must be accomplished ia England by men who have nothing- of the revolutionary temper ; such revolutions are always the best , and are alone enduring . The Peelites are disposed to be revolutionary from the most conservative feelings . They bother themselves with silly casuistries , with obsolete cereniouialisms , with pitiful puerilities ; it isr however , because they believe that the eternally celestial is enshrined in all this . That they believe in the eternally celestial in some form is enough to make us love them . With those alone must we forswear brotherhood who deny the eternally celestial . The Peelites are not the slaves of formulas , however fervent they may be in their idolatry of ritual . Though , therefore , conscientious and high-minded , they will nevier be Quixotes to the death for a crotchets They will yield at the right time , not from selfishness or fickleness , not from the low calculations of the adventurer , but because , if they have the narrowness of a traditional creed , they have the comprehensiveness of the infinite feeling out of which the creed sprang . There is a dash of dilettaiiteism in all -their sayings anddoings ; but whom in these days , excepfc the cynics , does dilettanteism not infect ? Even the cynics have their dilettante nioods , and TiiACKTSiiAY , the high priest of the cynics , whines and whimpers now and then very much like the blubbering boobies whom he ridicules . The Peelites cannot rule England for any long period ; their weakness of character and their fastidiousness render this impossible . But in the transition from Whiggery to a genuine , national statesmanship , the Peelites have a godlike mission to fulfil . Let us not blame them for being Peelites , and merely Peelites . Providence lias no daintiness in the choice of instruments , and why should we be more dainty than Providence ? The Peelites do not , like the Whigs , claim Downing-street as a perpetual patrimony ; they are human beings , and not odious oligarchs- They proclaim the alliance between monarchy and democracy , but they leave aristocracy to take care of itself . Even if the ' PeeUt . es could do nothing but deliver us from the thraldom to the Whigs , we should owe them everlasting gratitude—it is always so welcome to get rid of a thing which has no heart . Meanwhile , though we would prepare England for Peelism , we would prepare it for what is to succeed it . When Palmeeston , the heartiest of the Whigs , departs from the scene , there is uo one but Gladstone to take his place . We arc convinced that Gladstone will yet be prime minister of England ; we" are convinced that England will grow very tired of him . It will hunger , and pant , and shriek for a man * and Gladstone is a clever though honest Oxford professor . Alter the Oxford professor we iqusti have an Englishman , 'who combines the radiant Apoi ^ o and the robust JtEltouiiES ; we must have the . marriage of the Ideal and the Keal . That the iarce of chattering epileptic parliamentariBrn , of which we have all grown so ; tired , can keep on its legs or wag its tongue much longer is impossible . 'Hansard has' grown a nuisance . Nobody now reads the bes ) t-r « ported speeches , though the Times fiuds them useful to fill its column *? . Constitutionalism is perhaps not in a healthier condition than parliamentarism . Though , therefore , we would be merciful to the reporter ^ we think that enough has been reported till something moreia achieved .
perfectly , the divine ideal of a Commonwealth . The English confound empiricism with wisdom ; they act exactly like the physician who , having- never studied anatomy or medicine , would treat each fresh case of disease in a rush , rough , experimental way . . The English are fond of calling this habit by very filie names : but , besides rendering their politics immoral , it exposes them continually to disgraces and disasters . Two hundred years ago the Puritans tried to erect a Hebrew theocracy in England . Here , at least , there was the ideal of the State with the Scriptures as ft guide m the embodiment of the ideul . The ' endeavour was laudable , oven it it tragically foiled . Since then we have hod nothing but the Jiorce battles of factions , and in the dust and smoke of the fight no holy vision of the State couW be seen . If they did not receive profound , puissant impulses ftwen their oolossal industrialism , the English people would sink into absolute fatalism . They are roused from their letliartrv bv the thunder of gig-antio stoam hammers , and , halt
awake , they think that something *» ust really bo dyne erq they go to sleep again , For the most puft , however , they go to aloep agum without doing anything . Wo are not pleading for abstvaeUons , which must ever bo as barren for the State as for the individual . The worship of absfcrnotions has been the curse both of Jfwnoe and of Amerion , and Napowion woa right in his contempt and hatred for those whom he called ideologists . A country cannot nourish \ t »
Untitled Article
npHE following Statistics relating to the . Debtor ancl UrecUt system Jl will be interesting afc the present time : —We learn by the Judicial Statistics of 1859 , that in that year 1 , 582 petitions ( of which ynly 134 . 2 proceeded up to the " adjudication , " ) were presented to the Ouuyts of . Bankruptcy ; 897 by creditorfi , ' and 44 , 5 by debtors themselves ,. The debtors also presented 240 petitions for private arrangements , widow can be carried out with the consent of three fifths iu number and value of the creditors . The adjudications declared 1 , 84 . 8 persons bankrupts either trading singly or in copartnership . Out of these 1 , 260 passed their , exainimition . The uinount of their debts , as stated by themselves , was £ 8 , 215 , 029 ; airaiiiBt which thev only nroduoed assets value ; &L 785 , 2 b' 8 , Out ot
this sum had to be provided " special charges nud deductions , ; £ 31 . 8 , 729 , debts-r-isueh as wages and taxes , to be paid iu f « U , £ Z 8 , 27 (> , leaving assete auffieient to pay about three shiUingfl in the pound ; but no less than dB < W ) 9 , 85 a were required for " expenses , so that epeditora only got an , average dividend of little move thim two shillings and uixpenoe . . If we go from bankruptcy to insolvency we fli » d the financial result not duite so good , Out of ^ 387 petitions presented , to the
Untitled Article
«> y « The header andSaturday ' Analyst . LMAnca 24 , 18 t > 0 .
The Peelites.
THE PEELITES .
Debtors And Queditors.
DEBTORS AND qUEDITORS .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), March 24, 1860, page 276, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2339/page/8/
-