On this page

• Departments (1)
  • 
• Text (4)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    2^6 The Reviewer oft.V. on his Review. .

  • 

    MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS

  • 

    "MfB REVIEWER OF THE I. V. ON THE LETTER...

  • 

    To the Editor of the Monthly Repository.

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Dec. 9, 1807. Dear And Respected Sir, Ho...

    dent from Mosheim , who asserts and proves , * that many pages are without any annotations , that no

    futile trifles or impious nonsense are to be met with , but every where evident proofs of a Christrevering mind ; herein erring alone , that he found our Saviour not in

    the words pf the O . T . but in the deeds and facts there recorded . Alas ! poor Servetus ! You would wish with me ^ Sir , tbar this singular man had devoted his extra-

    Dec. 9, 1807. Dear And Respected Sir, Ho...

    ordinary talents to physic and philosophical researches excliu sively . For human kind ,, for Christendom ' s sake ^ I could re . new this wish . ; but what mortal shall criticise guiltless the ways of unerring wisdom ? I submit and adore .

    I remain ^ With the highest regard , Yours , & c . CANDIDUS .

    2^6 The Reviewer Oft.V. On His Review. .

    2 ^ 6 The Reviewer oft . V . on his Review . .

    Miscellaneous Communications

    MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS

    "Mfb Reviewer Of The I. V. On The Letter...

    "MfB REVIEWER OF THE I . V . ON THE LETTER OP . ^ OUB OP THE EDITORS .

    To The Editor Of The Monthly Repository.

    To the Editor of the Monthly Repository .

    March 20 , ISiO . MR , * As the object of my Review of the Improved Version , and of my Table of Passages in which it

    leaves Gnesbachs 2 d edition , was prospective , rather than retro - spective , I request your insertion of a few remarks upon the letter cf One of the Editors , " inserted

    id pp . 81—83 . That I am a decided friend of the cause , I trust would be doubted t > y none of the readers of my critique ; and that , in common with all the subscribers to the I . V . I

    feel greatly indebted to the ] £ ditors for the exertion and talents devoted to the object , I think I need not now declare * But when I undertook to review the work , I felt it a duty to forget , as much

    To The Editor Of The Monthly Repository.

    as possible , every thing but thi work itself ; and to point out , as fully as your limits would allow .

    every thing which appeared tome objectionable . If I have succeeded in doijig this decidedly and correctly , but candidly and consistently with the great respect I entertain for ^ those to whom the

    execution of the work was entrusted * I am satisfied . — -That my Table was not caused b % any motives inconsistent with those which I have now stated , must be obvious to all who will

    carefully peruse my remarks at the close of it , in p . 737 of your last volume , I readily admit , that correctness in " the spelling of a word , " or even in u the position of a crotchet , " must be regarded ai «

    • Pp . 9 « and J 4 x .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1810, page 226, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/mrp_02051810/page/10/