On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    12

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Jl He Marquis <Of Laxsdownk Rose To Move...

    observance of thefce forms ) some sort of religious _ceremony should be connected with so important an act as marriage . But for that very reason it seemed desirable that the religious ceremony should be the one most agreeable to the conscientious feelings of the parties , most binding in their views of

    religion , and most connected with their usual habits , worship , and opinions . Assuming that toleration was the recognized principle of the law of England , how could their Lordships wish to enforce conformity in such a matter as this ? The last exception which he would make to such a principle would be ,

    to require a compulsive and insincere acquiescence in opinions , which the party on other occasions disavowed , on his entering upon a ceremony which , above all others , ought to imply and require sincerity and opre _^ iness of heart . " Your Lordships , " said he , _" cannot hope , your Lordships I am sure do not wish , at any other period , to compel a person to admit doctrines which

    his conscience disavows ; and can you require that at such a moment , at a time least of all tolerating any sort of equivocation , and requiring perfect sincerity , the parties should trifle with their principles arid consciences , and pretend to conform to what they on all other occasions disavow , and which

    you allow them to disavow ? Surely I need not argue that no benefit can be derived to the Church , the State , or the cause of Morality from such B _' coafortuity - as this . "

    On th _^ _se grounds the Bill had been framed . Every thing had been regarded that could give civil security y publicity of every sort , and the usual precautions required in other marriages , were recognized by it : all that was asked wtis , that after passing through all the _forntfalities imposed on parties marrying at Church , the parties should be allowed to solemnize the religious ceremony in their own

    places of worship , according to their own religious rites , and afterwards to register their marriages in the palish books . Not professing that the Bill in its present form was perfect , —willing to listen to any suggestions for its improvement , especially from the reverend bench opposite , ( anticipating , however , one objection to the number and kind of places that might be

    registered , by saying that he had no objection to confine the privilege to buildings solely appropriated to religious worship , )—willing also to believe that there existed in the House no wish to impose a burthen on conscience , and no desire to retain any thing for the sake of mere power and influence , h _6 should confidently leave the Bill to their Lordships , and move that it now be read a second time .

    The Lord Chancellor regretted he was obliged to oppose the motion : he was perfectly satisfied that such an important measure should have been brought in at a much earlier period . No man could look at it without

    seeing that the generality of its provisions marked that the parties themselves had not had time to give it the consideration it deserved . He begged now to _state and _repeat , that while he yielded to no nian in an _inflexible a _^ t _^ chtnent to the Church as _ealablisheti by law , he was fully as _nwch _iatfiienced by

    12

    12

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), June 12, 1823, page 12, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/smrp_12061823/page/12/