On this page
-
Text (1)
-
i5
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
The Professed Design Of This " Appendix/...
the Appendix " to have ask « 3 : ^ but in regard i ^ reply , ; te has altogetlaer mbtaken it * I will not iu tliis instance employe harsher tenii : still it seern ^ no more tfeaa fair , a $ heissQ 4 tefi » irp ^ s of making the answer $ > ukliG , that the public should httifcrnw
aversion of it too * I was determined , from motives whiehil n $ ed not explain , to have no conversation upon coiigregational matters with Mr * Mander , beyond what was farced up ® n ine : mad to his question ( nut-- in a careless manner ) Weil ! I suppose
you have found matters mu & has I have stated fchemi * " my > r £ ply was Very likely " This , to serve his purpose for publicity * is inferpreted CCI believe they ^ are /^ I np mteptioD , ^ ad jbe ; m * xst Jbave been a ^ F ^ re of it at fefee tkoe , to e ^^ r upon tlie , 4 ^ 3-
-cnossion of the subject : for > had I been ioclii © ed to say any thh * g i-espectii ^ g Ms letter * o Mi % Bpai ^ by , I should have dienie 4 th ^ truth ( as I now deny it ) of Ws a ^ ertion . , that I a § ked him for the
money b ^ longmg the Trustees . Whe n it was no longer con-^ enient for him to pay 5 per cent , for it , fee requested J 3 a # | o take it off his haads , saying that the security might lie as it < lid
It was ray intention to have oifieTed a fe ^ v re marks on . ^ ie ek ^ tien of Mr . Jaineson ; but Mr . Bmnsby ^ s detail x > f all this transaction , taken from original do ^ umenis , is so perspiowQJis and so inapartial > that even the writer of jthe u Appendix " Jh ^ s
not dared to call its accuracy into question ; except in a single instance , and in ^ hat instance , as in every other , Mr . Br ^ nfifeyfs ^ tatetnent ma y set both sophistry and slander at defiance ^ ^ Mr- iBransby , " says the writer of the Appendix , ^ denies that
fthe Meetivig House was locked and gaarded ,. but does-not < diV pmveit : and when I recollect that hi 3 only means QfmfocBQatiian was through a person who was too young at the time it 6 ccurred to have any distinct remembrance of it , to what credit
I would ask , is he entitled ?"—If Mr . C . Mander will trouble himself to " recollect , " Mr . Bransby declares at theyery beginning of his reply to Verax f that in relating what passed about
Mr . Jameson , he would not write a single syllable upon heatsay evidence / ' Whatever may be Mr . Charles Mander ^ s id ^ as on he subject , I koow 1 ; o ** what credit" Mr-Bransby * is . entitlcdj "
I5
i 5
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 22, 1819, page 5, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/smrp_22021819/page/5/
-