On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (2)
-
Critique on the British Critic* 717
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
msncement of each separate book , is given the name of the translator . —Thus , Dr . Geddes ' Version is adopted as far as the Second Book of Chronicles , Dr . Hodgson ' s of the Proverbs , Isaiah is translated by Lowth and Dodson , Job by Heath and Scott , Jeremiah by B / ahey , Ezekiel and the
Twelve Minor Prophets by Archbishop Newcome ; men whose shoelatchets these arrogant pretenders are not worthy to unloose . They conjecture , however , I suppose , that among those who deserve to be styled the cc most approved modern Translators , " Dr . Geddes \\ sls not omitted or forgotten ; this
indefatigable and excellent Hebraist they have the modesty to style " a burlesquer of Scripture /' They add , 4 t This is the translation , reader , which this late fellow
and tutor , desires to offer instead of the established version , which he modestly includes under the general charge of a defectiveness , which has hitherto been an
obstacle to the reading of the Scriptures . The other obstacle is according to him , * ' the intermixture of a considerable portion of less important matter with what is confessedly excellent /* He has therefore omitted much . " I would
ask these wiseacres , if they are prepared to affirm , that all parts of scripture are alike instructive and important , or even that there are not . parts of the Old Testament which a father of a family would wish to keep from the sight of his servants and children . It was the -opinion of a man , equally pious as well as wiser and more learned than either of the British . Critics , I mean Dr . Watts , that such a selection as the present would be highly useful as a { family » Bible «
Critique On The British Critic* 717
Critique on the British Critic * 717
Untitled Article
The malice of the following sentence will therefore , provoke only a smile of contempt . u It is perfectly plain from Mr . Brown ' s
preface , that he , with his pious authority Geddes , thinks the scriptural historians not only uninspired , but not always judicious wiiters . " The review ends with the following pious and laudable wish , < fc May obscurity and oblivion be the portion of this vile attempt to mangle and depreciate tke Scriptures ! f" Such , Sir , in the opinion of these enlightened sages , are the labours of Geddes , Lowth , Newcome , Wakefield ,
Dodson , & c . men , who , to use Mr . Brown ' s language , 4 i were in their days burningandshininglights and whose learned and useful labours , though themselves are removed from this earthly scene , enable them still to speak to the edification and improvement of the
living . " Really , the impertinent snapping arid baiking of these would-be-critics is quite ludicrous . Their idol , their oracle , their
Hoysley is no more , —they have no longer the weight of his name or the authority of his learning , but they endeavour to supply these deficiencies by copying the coarse - ness of his abuse , and the grossness
of his misrepresentations , —yet after all their pains , they are found indeed to be Ci full of souod and fury /* but u signifying nothing /' It requires no wonderful degree of sagacity to predict that iC obscurity
and oblivion will be the portion of this despicable attempt to mangle and depreciate * ' the characters of those illustrious men whose labours have been honoured with the abuse of the Uvitish Critics , Your * s truly FAIR-PLAY
Untitled Article
voi * . in . 5 c
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1808, page 717, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1706/page/25/
-