On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    and hoping , in this manner , to convince our readers that the Mafgaret Professor ' s hostility to the Bible Society , is dictated by political rather than by religious

    considerations , P . 5 . What better safe-guard [ against $ hc delusions of Jqhe interpretation of the fiiblc \ can we offer than the book of Common Prayer , winch contains the doctrines of the Bible , according to il » true exposition ?" Now , without inquiring whether the book of Common Prayer be intelligible to all , we must be

    permitted to obserye that * at best , it can do no more than enable men to know , what are the docfrjjies of ih $ Bible , ^ ccord ^ g to the creeds $ c . qftheCkufch of England . Th e l $ i ble i& £ lf it cannot assist jtjiem t& underhand , becau # & j $ o § $ got epntfrn ' sm ? ftrrip&fgl

    arguments and illustrations ; being a : Volq $ ie , partly of deVotioriaS Mt& ! ? WW « r ^ clesias tl c al di . ?§ qfen $ in # artiste * '' & * & i / i a vpry small degree of elementary instructions Dr Marsh would' have &sfe 4 m pte pgftj ^ e | i t ]| | n lh 4 . ir * 4 gmtnt of Pwtsm m th

    creed , or in Seder's tecfiures on the catechism , r His statement ptapes Ae ntatler 6 n tlie i&cJVfe foofci Wg . of Amp « p 9 % & 9 fl ! y ; ( w ^ ^ substitution of the m ^* s- book for the coirttnoix-praver , it is perfectly < p ^ r |^ le | p | th e ^ e |^ S ^ of apjr j

    ^ p m ^ i pf ^ e ^ t . 7 . * Sudbt are groundeTviz , the principte 4 6 f Protcttkndam ^ oil whiclr a cMtchmah m / rClaAct ; , in fiiK speech at Cambridge , j justifies tfeedUtri&tfoft ¦ ° / . ¥¥ L ^ ff- «* W ^ ff ^ WWSSPPWi * 11 M # Jsa ^ nfelm ^ seimmcn t 6 of zhinfrvidital , bSt ^ 9

    fecifag t ^ « cndmtnt « lof a pwrtyS - • # Wh y does the Margaret Professor introduce & i ^ oW sb oflen-« iye as ^ party ?** Ddes he eon .

    Untitled Article

    ceivje off the views of others agree * ably to feelifigg the reality of which his own experience attests ? He is guilty of a departure from the rules of fair reasoning and of , m m ' ft * " ^ r ^ . _ ft

    liberal manners . By assuming that the advocates of the Bibte Society are a ** party , " he begs the question , aad makes a rash and unjust estimate of their motives . In a country the mqj p rfty of whose inhabitants ar £ avowedly

    Christians and Protestants it is something new to see the friends of the circulation of the Bible without note or comment repre - sented as a party 9 and especially when they are known to consist of almost every description pf per *

    sons in church aad state . 1 O , " It is not the j } ib ) e . * 7 {(?^ but the perversion of ijt , the wrest ing of the Scriptures ( £ s ftt , Pejer expresses it ) by * the upl £ 3 rned and unstable / with which [ whom ] England now swarms , whence thp danger proceeds . " And again ,

    11 . •• Have the persons to wh « m Bi-Ww are ^ ratmtqmly distribuiaed cijth ^ $ ? W » fi ? " fif ^ inoliaa ^ ion pr |^ e ability to weigh the argunuptt * for rfhgicwf opinions ? ' * ' ' ' l ^ f T 1 ' i ¦ f , r - » ' A ^ ure 4 i y » with pij r r ^ pept for the Profe 3 ^> r ? s * $ ! £# # § ji ^ ^| tto

    taj am ^ Js , w ^ we W jis « ma&e / jl at aimh r ? ft 3 Q ^ g § . b ^ ljey ^ Jjba ^ t ^ gei ^ r ^ iiiy qf bis Prp ^ es | finf Fftajder ^ , * ygl cp ^ id ^ r tfe ^ m a ? mOre jtfean . is » vp » Piii } g gt'&P&ffrf * ( 8 ) . Tb ! & priocjiple ^ ^ jtpp d ^ ncy ^ bja Mgufpej ^ t , ^ 16 * 4 ;« C-

    ' ? lywg ^/ I fie ^ fl fmn ^ i BKWK viasvY { ib- ) 9 Mfr $ M * SBPNSfk W 89 tp « Ito'lMMMimN ) / ' ?^» P 9 R 5 Umb ciimmQB ^ pljaces of Bossuet and tl ^ Wf ^ - & JrM ^^ l i ^^^?^ E * 5 W ^ ii ^ tfesy &WW $ 8 , $ ej 8 WfM * wfc ^ ft their aim 1 ^ te ^^ Ml ^^ it ^ necessity otatt infaiiifejeguide aft * ^ 5 ' , tl 7 . JO /

    Untitled Article

    656 Review . — -Marsh and Clarke on the Bible Society .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), April 2, 1812, page 258, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1747/page/50/