Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
bring in bis bill of the last session ? If that be not the case , might it Hot be expedient ( as Mr . William
Smith is such a famous . advocate for expediency ) for him to call upon Lord Sidmouth publicly , just to state to the country what the exact fact was upon that subject ?
I will also ask him , When Lord Liverpool sent to the Dissenters , and also to the Methodists , to call upon his lordship , and to meet
Mr . William Smith , whether they did not respectively accept of bis lordship ' s invitation , and whether they did not also decline positively to meet Mr . William Smith ? And
I ) 4 * n ust upw ask iim , Whether si ^ ch refusal , even to meet him at the Earl of Liverpools ' , did proceed , or could proceed , from say very marked approbation which t $ ey respectively bestowed on the miserable measure of this present Member fw Norwich , whose semithis topic may *
• jrf ^^? ftypf (^ p ^ radfyenture , Qot exactly agree with ttije ^ p q £ M * J ** % re ^ peq ^ le con-^ $ & * $ s £ , . . ... , v ' . ,, * S $ ra J # n \ now ^ b ^ ut asking questions , I may as well perhaps * 8 & 2 ^ w ^ ? w ^^ dy
^ . owswnen ;^ nave ^|^ it § fl : to JJwIe ¦ WW $ e JWWPJ ? of , wgw 4 at-. ffirWHIFW ' ?* $ ¦*** * ^ ™ ?*« r-- ?^* * W * W JPW *** . ^ W 1 X 4 vet-^ frM ^ j ^ y ^^ - ww » l * r «? f wp wSm , M h ( mwpa , . w »* . »« - wfiH # » « 3 aftfc ^ ***
Mm-, w fi ^ f 8 S | m ^ t w «» n « tbw www * -ftyssw ^ 'i ^^ s' ^ tf' ^ fSH ^ tr ^^ *^ -w ^ . Ti » 6
about the cit * es of London ^ ayd Westminster , ' lies uow before mt . That petition shew * , ^ - -Xbat- 'yoiur petitiouers , conceiving the right of worshipping GoU according to the dictates of thuir own conaciences
to he derived fro « i the Author of their lfeing and confirmed by the Fouinkr of tke ChrisUan faith , and therefore not to be subject to the controul of human authority , cannot but regard with deep cod , cern those statutes which restrain
and limit the exercise of * & $ right , and impose coj ^ ditions and pena ^ ties that seem to them as unjust m their principle , as they are iDJu rious to the vital interests ^ of-troe
religion /* Andibat petition ^ prays , u That every remaining \ penal statute , which extend * its opera ~ tion& to the province \ of rdLigion be
may be repealed ^—\\ i \\ h now pretended that Mr . Smith has been acting in unispn with tbctoe worthy ministers of religion i u Or will it be cow tended ihat the Disin
aett ^ rs that district , who ^ ttie laymen ^ have lfis $ > correct opkiions upon tbw wabject than their ckrgy , aad pore ct ) nfor « n ^ bltt ta > * her ioon ~ ceptiooft « f Mr , ! William > &j » ithtf ;
An km toiiea , or the biihopai , Mr . Smithy m allieei He , as ye ^ dmlainw th « k allian ce add support ; a « 4 they dbciaim hi « Also .-r-rAFe the » bigs those per sons who agree with Iwm ? The
wxblime protest wriUen by Lord Holland in < X ) nae 4 uence of the i ^ ect ^ n of « ray BiU ^ wfaicb pMlesl ia 0 % imM by ti «? Du ^ e of No # ~ folk Anidl by -Ihe Marquisv of Laasdowi ^ y as wall m * iito pL * arddHi > imrtaMmspm&i ¦ itoilitqB * mm "
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1812, page 462, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1750/page/54/
