On this page

• Text (2)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    Lord , " * the u Advocate at the Father V right haitd , " and in the midst of a congregation met together in his name ,, would be also petitioned , prayed to , as able to save to the uttermost all who come unto that GOD through

    him- Towards such an approximation , the first step would be the abdication of all unscriptural phraseology ; the subordination and delegated authority of the Logos—Theos , the next : but within the ample range of this preliminary circumscription , the

    proposed Liturgy would expatiate as freely as the letter of the Bible would admit , and scarcely therefore propitiate , in all its parts , an unanimous , though concurrent expression of devotion . While ' * the mercy-seat " shone with none but borrowed rays ,

    it would still perhaps peer as one of the most prominent features of the sanctuary ; as the incense ascended from its altar , the high priest who wafted it towards heaven might still fix the tearful eye of many a"suppliant , and when the AHelujah ascended with one heart and voice to Him who

    sitteth upon the throne , what if the Lamb were not all around , so with one heart and voice , forgotten ? Thes £ are appalling annunciations , undoubtedly , to many a scriptural Christian ; there are , on the other hand . iiot a few

    as consistent Bib lists , whose ear they will by no means offend ; and for one , I am free to confess , that though reformation proceeded no farther than to these limits , most cordially should I rejoice to see the religious service of the Established Sect ( the best , in my

    opinion , but for its traditional deformities , with which I am acquainted , ) so far purged of what every idolater of the litera scripta of the sacred records must deem its two capital pollutions . Whether the more sweeping Unitarian would patronize what he might deem

    so partial , so insufficient a compromise , f know not : but from the silence of our body , I certainly presume that mere man-ism , ( I use the word iti no invidious sense , ) is averse from the experiment . To that implied decision , I now therefore respectfully bow with regret , and subscribe myselfi J . T . CLARKE . i .. , ¦ , ¦ . . . ¦ . . * Act * ii . 36 . See Oriesbach in lp

    Untitled Article

    40 Dr . Philipps on the Review of his Sermon before the Unitarian Fund . *

    Untitled Article

    Broom JBank 9 jtear Sheffield , Sin , January 17 > 181 9 * THE Reviewer of my Discourse , which was preached in May last , before the Supporters of the Unitarian Fund , having intimated to tne , [ Vol .

    XIII . p . 766 , ] " that it is not quite correct" perhaps , " to quote Luke vi . 12 , as a proof that our Lord continued a whole night in ' a dreary solitude , since tfpoo-evxri , sometimes , and probably here , signifies an oratory , or 44 house of prayer ; " I feel myself

    called upon to explain . lam well satisfied , and have always entertained the opinion , that the word Trpoa-evxy often signifies an oratory , and that such is the sense in the passage quoted , as well as in Acts xvi . 13 , to which the reviewer has referred me . But the

    term " dreary solitude" was a term which I applied , as every reader may see , not to thentpocrtvyfl , but the mountain to which our Lord had gone , and on which he continued all night , ( Sox-WKT € p € vuv € v ti ) < xpocr £ vxy rov ® £ 0 t 7 ) "in the oratory of God . " Some indeed ; think this to be rather a harsh

    translation , and prefer the common version , which is also adopted in the new one , and which I have followed , notwithstanding its . supposed incorrectness . Indeed this adoption cannot require

    much defence , when it must be admitted that prayer or devout communion with God ( which is prayer taken in its most comprehensive sense ) was our Saviour ' s object . Tndeed it ought to be mentioned in favour of the

    common translation , that the Cambridge Manuscript has oevrov after the word 7 vpo < revxQ instead of rov . The reviewer has referred me to Acts xvi . 13 , and Bishop Pearce ' s Commentary and Note . 1 have not that author at hand , but I admit that the Jews had their

    irpoo-evxcu near to rivers , or by the seaside , and in other retired places on the plains ; or , near to ( as the preposition € ig sometimes signifies ) the mountains ; but they had them also on the hills an mountains themselves , the retreat of the moat recluse , because the least

    exposed to intrusion . See Jennings ' s Jewish Antiquities , Vol . II . p . 91 , also p , 6 & These irpoa-evxai included a certain space of ground enclosed with walls and open to the Heaven * , according to Philo , Josephus and Other writers , whither devout persons iresorted alone , or in company , for reli-

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1819, page 40, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1768/page/40/