On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
upon $ e fteb members of a Christian congregation the propriety of condescension and courtesy to their pooref Christian brethren , I might reason in this manner , €€ Know ye nat that your poor brethren will sit with Abraham , and Isaac , and Jacob , and Jesus , in heaven , and if this be their destination , are they unworthy of your fellowship ?" Here would be an argument similar to that of the Apostle . Here a claim to an inferior would be deduced from destination to a , superior honour .
A distinction has been made be * tween the reasonings of the apostles and the doctrines an which tliey are founded ; and it lia § been contended , that the doctrines may be divine though the reasoning should be inconclusive .
Now I admit that the divinity of doctrines is indepencfeat of the conclusiveness of reasonings . At the same time , however , it appears to me that there was a necessity for guarding the apostles from error in reasoning as well as from , error in doctrine , and
that , therefore , as whatever was necessary for the perfection of the Christian dispensation wattld not be with- * holden from . it , we may believe that the apostles were guarded from error
in their reasonings as well as in their doctrines . If reasoning was necessary , the eonclusivepess of reasoning must have been necessary . A necessity for reasoning is just the same thing as a necessity for couclusiveness of
reasoning , and , therefore , if it was necessary for the apostles to reason , it was necessar y for them ta reason conclusively . Now , if reasoning" bad not been necessary , it would never have been used . It could be only a necessity for it that could suggest the adoption of it . . ¦
Perhaps ^ however , it will be said , that the mere statement of , the doctrines upon the authority of God xyaa sufficient--tliat reasoning was no further necessary than ajs suitable to " Uistrate them—that reasoning was advantag eous rather than necessary , and that independently of h the bare ^ ord of God would have been enough ^ JJ establish the respective doctrines of - u-w tfaafry . Well ,. l «* t the pr < ani » e * j * narro wed , aqd let it be allowed „ ^ asonings wre o ^ ^ eful , not u !*!? . ry in the strict aeitee , of the uor it may still be asked , " fcr i *
likely that he who shed such a prof a * sion of communications upon the pri * mitive Christians , as we see somewhat exemplified in the first Epistle to the Corinthians , would refuse to guard pn apostle from error in an useful argument V Surely in an jage in which
inspiration was communicated , so copiously—an age in which the words of the prophet Joel , as quoted * by Peter in Acts ii ., were aipplicable , an apostle might expect , and would expect , a communication on every occasion in which it would be useful .
Our Lord promised to his disciples that the spirit of truth would abide with them , eis ton aiona . From this spirit of truth , then , the apostles would expect every assistance that would be beneficial to them ' and their
cause . They would never believe that that spirit would desert them at a time when . they were in danger of making mistakes in their reasonings . It is true that the apostles do not say that they are divinely inspired , or divinely , guarded in their reasonings ^
But it was not necessary to say this in an age in which divine assistance was ao common , and in which , divine assistance on every suitable , occasion would be taken for granted . Those whom they addressed would take this for granted , without any special declaration respecting it . AUQUIS .
A Protest of Sir Isaac Newton ' s . > 59 £
Sir , r 1 HE following morceau is from . JL D' Israeli ' s Second Series of Curiosities of Literature . ( Vol . I . pp . 65 , 66 . ) Should you be able to give the protest of Sir Isaac Newton ' s , to which it alludes , entire to your readers , it would , no doubt , be generally acceptable . A PURVEYOR .
* ' When the fury of Jhe civil Avars had exhauaed all parlies , and a breath * ing time from the passions and mad * ness of the age allowed ingenious men to return once more to their forsaken studies , Baconfs vision of a pluloso *
phical society appears to have occupied their reveries . It charmed the fancy of Cowley and Mifcton ; but the politics and religion of the times Were still possessed bf the same phrenzy and d ) vioity and polkica were unaoimously agreed to be utterly proscribed
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1823, page 591, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1789/page/31/