On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    one generally apprpv ^ of 5 jtl ^ r af ^^^ i ^ n 9 LM ^ t !> pas ^ forwasi muqh as it is worth . But wJiQ isj 49 , < J ^ cuJ # i what { the genuineUriftity ? otSm& Eat ^ blisfefed Church is ? Are unconnected individuals in a church which 'talbne has authority in matters of faith s * to , be made a standard ? Or ana I to fee ' told that , there are so many different opinions upon the subject , nobody can tell what or where the real doctrine is ? Certainly not . I can read the creeds

    and articles and forms of worship to which all assent , and I imagine myself competent to judge of their meaning . 1 know that in the bosom of the Establishment there are some persons who utterly disbelieve what their outward profession supposes them to acquiesce in ; and that there are others who manage to relieve themselves from a troublesome consciousness of inconsistency , by ingenious explanations and specious glosBes * These ,

    however , are comparatively few . It would , indeed , be absurd to conclude them otherwise , since the only possible use of a common profession mast be to ensure a common faith . In such a constitution , every departure from an absolute unity of opinion is a flaw in the operation of the system . ^ I must therefore contend , till some very strong proof to the contrary shall be produced , that the God of the Church of England is the God of her members ;

    that the . Trinity of the Athanasian Creed , of the Articles , and of the Litany , is the T r inity of the people . Any other explanation , though it may be the doctrine of individuals , is not that of the church , nor that of the people at large . t Trje ( goc / rine of the church is that laid down in her formularies , and fy § do $ rin $ of the people that actually espoused by them in their unequiydca ) . cpndncU The church says of Athanasius ' s Creed , that it shall

    " qe sung of , said ?* fourteen times in the year , and the people sing or say it fourtejen '( in | e ^ ja » t ^ e year . The church says , " here folioweth the Litany to fyp ? ung ors , ai ( i # fter morning prayers , " and it is sung or said by the people ^ T ^ e cjiurch . ^ ays , that the curate of every parish shall diligently instruct chilclren . / in a certain catechism , "to be learned by every , person before he pon ^ e to , j ^ e confirmed by the bishop , " and the children are taught the d ^ ctniies q £ thajt catechism . Now in that Athanasius ' s Creed , and in that Litany , ano ! in , that Catechism , are contained in plain and express

    terms , the very yje ^ s . which Clericus Cantabrigiensis would fain persuade us are unfair and exaggerated . Do we exaggerate the Athar ^ asiqn Cf # ed when we say that it teaches Txitheism ? Do we exaggerate the Litany when we assert that * it supposes a suffering and expiring God ? Do we exaggerate the Catechism when we state that it speaks distinctly of tbifee independent

    Gods , with different names and fulfilling different offices ? Vfe might safely leave'these questions to be answered by any one who will take the , ^ rouble of ito 6 ^ qg into the Book of Common Prayer . We will now examine one point on | y , I assert , that it is believed by the Church of England ( hat God sufrereci apd died . That , your correspondent replies , is " an ultra ^ pr ^ odox statement * ' " ah unfair and exaggerated view . " I have one question to

    as ^ , an answer Io which will settle this at once : to whom , do the m , embers of tile' cfiurch ^ djrect their prayers ? To God or man ? To whom are the $ Q \ v < f > rfl 3 adqreused : " by thine agony and bloody sweat ; by thy crp $ s aiid p ^ ssicjn *^ ' by thy precious death an 4 burial ; by thy glorious resun ^ cfipn and ascensjon , and b y the coming of the Holy Ghost ^ Good hord * deUyer v $ l i , Ityffi is ' j ^ t ^ feij addressed to God himself or it ! $ not . The being who tyMr , , dk&sfeA . ik one capable of suffering fpassion J of being in an agon ^ an < l o £

    dying ; the adjuration supposes him to have actually suffered and die ^ q Who is the being prayed to in this language ? Is he God or is he man r * . The dilemma is obvious .

    Untitled Article

    8 / 2 On the Statement of Trmh < ma ? i \ Doetrine&i > y Umtcmans .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1827, page 872, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1803/page/16/