On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    a perm ^ iieflt > nattti ^ kv ^^ ^^^ chrm | fBe ^ obpwbyer ^ I to ^ k&a ^ $ ff 0 § # feftfp pt JV | r * P ^ ftefi $ hq \§ &s $$ j& ^ feauffe , " ^ 'f ^ as |; e 4 by tlifj iCoji ^ i ^ i )(^ ri € > fd EgS ^ t p » inquiry , ' fie had avpvsfed' hiiifseiC an Arian . vTbere ; $ rere / jro the : S $ nodaii least four parties ^ the yio | ettcfy Orthodox , the moderately Orthodox */ thbse suspected of Arianism wko did not avow it , and the acknowledged Ariank . The first party , with which the motion for dismissing Mr . Porter originated , and who were for carrying all measures

    for the purification of the Synod with a high hand , may be considered as having Mr . Cooke for its leader , and , from the signatures to a protest against Mr . Porter's continuance in office , may be set down as , comprising forty-one ministers and fourteen elders . In calling the others moderatel y' orthodox * it is not meant to insinuate that they are less convinced of the truth of the doctrines called Orthodox than Mr . Cooke himself , but that tihey hold them Ayith more cfcarity , and are averse to impose a yoke on their bmhretij © ft ©

    persecute them for the honest avowal of their opinions . To t&fevpaatfyi&&-longed Dr . Wright , the late Moderator , Dr . Hanna , the Syiiod ^ r Pw ± fessor of Diyimty-at Belfast , Mr . Carlile , of Dublin , one o £ the Sreeretitrieb of the Hibernian : Bible Society , and a great proportion of the most ! &g&hm& respectable ministers . These gentlemen , when the question was iMmdhced , could not approve , of Mr . Porter ' s sentiments , but they were shocked btntWe

    attempt , t oh remove a faithful officer for such a reason ; and the amendfneut wl > ic ? h wasHfinally iearried originated with them , and maybe considered < as their ^ easu r ^ M It is painfu l to s peak of the third party , some of whom imayfee o , bject # ai pity rather than resentment . Whether they have lately ¦ Fe ^ eiv ^^ a ii I accession of knowledge , like a member who has published ^ jsoonvi ^ ippy ^ rKl is now one of the most violent , or whether their fears

    bad it £ O / nw ( ch &afluenee , we presume not to say . They were , we hope , few in nvmhotf } for ^ bey toUld not hope to retain the respect of their old frie nds , andthe ^; JiaV ^ nQt sMce eeded in acquiring the good opinion of those wh&m they coqried . : Itiha » been said that the great Orthodox leader observed > 6 f some , 'Vthat ^ w ^ hpdoxpvvas not ^ orthodoxy ; - ' and thus it will < ' cjBier foe with tinaid ar ) id undecided characters . These persons , whoever they were * weye < ranged with ; the moderately Orthodox . The fourth pauty wafs ¦

    sn ^ ali andeeq , but it contained « the Rev . H . Montgomery , whose pbwepfbl spjEsech commanded the uespecbof his most bitter opponents , whilst it has secured him the esteem and admiration of the friends' of free -inquiry , wherever lk& debate has been circulated . Mr . Porter , himself , a map of considerable taints , did not tamely shrink from his opponents , but defended himself with $ pfaik anfl shewed himself an honest and independent man . The small

    numsbsinof * hia pariy must be attributed to the place of meeting , which was at a gr ^ a £ 4 ist , ance from the counties of Down and Antrim , where freedom of in-^ l ivy is ^ waore prevalent , and the consequent absence pf the greater number Qfcnimnifitqm froixl these counties , especially as the discussions which were J ^ ou igjik ^ jj pould- not have been expectedw iJr . Winder ' s letter , already re-% fjert ) t «> , r « hews that , in 1723 , the rules of the Scotch Church , and of the violated without

    4 W& $$ T §^ i ^ d ^ were scruple by onhodox majorities ; and the \< te ^ pj ^\ diorthodoxy , ki 1827 , kept the Synod occupied for dayft on itob-- ^ S ififiii # feieH >» Q ? notice had been ^ given ; though the code of diskipiinh , s ) NtetM . Q Mv * ^ alvTB boasts of as chiefly bis own work , lays it doWn , thafl ^* he i ^ lflW ^ d ^ eiPf Overtures' ^ is' to ; prepare all matters originally comx » e ^ trt »^ in ^^ flOcly <« iM that newfovertures shall be on thfe Bynod ^ s ^ woks ^ oii atffea § t ¦ ty ) & y ^ ar *'; It ! iftjftruelthfttthe , ielection of a cleiik , < mpIa » Heclarateiohiotf ) senti > - ji > qvJB , , ma ^ jaa bCi ^ oiisidet ^ jiasiACoix ^^

    Untitled Article

    qtJLpl Re ^^ Stj ^ vfUistett

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1827, page 910, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1803/page/54/