On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
former doctrine ! To me it appears that they must have cal «* cuiated ill in adopting such a fraud . Why were they not content to preach the spiritual resurrection , which they believed true ? If our author is correct , the deluded , devoted , wonderloving Jews in general would piously have taken their assertion for fact , as the followers of Sabbathai Sevi believed respecting
their leader , who , as far as the quotations go , appears to have been transported to heaven by the consent of his followers , without their taking the trouble to secure his body . The apostles only provoked detection by pretending ( if it was only pretence ) that the body of Jesus had risen . If they had been contented to say what ( according to our author ) they believed , * that his spirit was gone to heaven , and would return to the earth , '
their followers might have safely believed , and their enemies could not have confronted them . To give out a bodily resurrection , if the event was not real , was to volunteer gratuitous difficulties , not necessary , according to this author , for filling the gaping credulity of the Jewish multitude , but certainly exposing them ( whatever he may say to the contrary ) to every risk of detection at the hands of the rulers . My second observation on his theory is ,
that if the fraud had been necessary for the reception of the Gospel ( which on his theory it was not ); it was , by his own showing , absolutely impracticable . He asks , and endeavours to answer the question by a negative , ' whether the apostles would incur any risk of detection in attempting to execute their plan of joining the doctrine of a bodily resurrection , which they knew to be untrue , to that of a spiritual one , which they sincerely believed ?*—( p . 128 . )
Their scheme to prevent detection by their enemies , the priests * was , he says , of course , to obtain possession of the body , and give out that it had risen . * During the night' ( of Friday , the day of the Crucifixion ) ' Peter , with any disciples or apostles in whom he might most trust , might come to the sepulchre , and having displaced the stone from the entrance , by the same human efforts which had placed it there , might take away the body of Jesus . '—
( p . 129 . ) This might have been conjectured with something approaching to possibility—and therefore have been taken as historical fact—had it not been before distinctly allowed by the writer , that the apostles' faith in their master * might , for a moment , waver at a conjuncture so distressing as that of his public execution , ' ( p . 120 , ) and if he was not found arguing ( not very conclusively it is true , but no doubt stating his own deliberate
opinion ) that the apostles were ignorant of our Lord ' s prediction that he should rise from the dead .- —( p . 129 . ) Now , though the c momentary 9 distress of the apostles at finding their every hope extinguished in the death of Jesus , may , perhaps , be thought to have been over before night , if we question the author ' s verbal self-consistency ; yet it will hardly be thought consistent with human nature to represent the periods of despair , and grief , and
Untitled Article
Orthodoxy and Unbelief . 837
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1832, page 837, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct1826/page/45/
-