On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
* ' Nothing was ever more replete with absurdity , or ever gave a fairer handle ^ ( a keener edge ?) or a more irresistible force to the objections and to the sarcasms of infidelity . " This sentiment we shall not
at present canvass * The figurative * language under which it is partly conveyed is surely in * correct . JUr . B . waves the question , whether the pentateuch was written
altogether , or partially , by Moses , or whether , as some learned men have contented , it was the compilation of a later writer , and he properly considers it as not at all essential to the proof
of his proposition to suppose or to maintain that the pentafeucli is perfectly correct and authentic as a narrative ^ ( II 6 , 117 . ) These , nevertheless , are very interesting points of inquiry ; and
our theological students would perhaps , be materially assisted in the investigation of them bywhat is now a grand desideratum—an English translation of Eichhorn ' s Introduction to the
Old Testament . Our author assumes that the Jewish scriptures are at present , with little or no variation , the same as they were at the close of the Babylonian captivity , 500
years before Christ ; the grounds of which assumption he concisel y represents , ( 117—119 . ) He further takes for granted that the main facts of the Jewish history are true , ( 119—121 . )
From the just and sublime notions entertained by the Jews , of the character and attributes of the Supreme Being , and especially from their cohfirrned belief in the unity of God ^ he deduces
Untitled Article
the conclusion that they were favoured with a divine revelation ; ( 121 — 1 ' ^ S , ) and he here observes ( 127 , ) that the most enlightened sages of heathen [ and Jewish ] antiquity were strangers to some familiar reasonings derived from
present appearances in behalf of the leading doctrines of natural religion . By the sages of Jewisii antiquity we conceive him to mean the anti-deluvian patriarchs : but there is some ambiguity , if not inaccuracy , in his expression .
Mr . B . infers the substantial truth of the history , both of miracles and of ordinary events , contained in the Jewish scriptures ^ from the fairness and impartiality of the historians , ( 128—131 . )
The characters which they describe are various : some were exemplary — -others ^ wicked ; and if we admit , upon the faith of the Jewish historians , that David was a murderer , and that Solomon was an idolater and a voluptuary , we
are directed by the preacher to admit likewise , upon the credit of the same impartial writers , that Moses was a divinely authorized legislator , and that Isaiah was an inspired prophet , ( 130 ) We think , however , that this consideration is not stated with Mr . B / s
accustomed closeness and precision . It is beyond doubt a presumption of the authenticity of the Jewish history contained in the scriptures , that the vices of favourite and illustrious characters are
there recorded : but though the credibility of the writers may be sufficient to establish the guilt of David and of Solomon in particular transactions , yet it is riot equally , or in the same manner .
Untitled Article
328 Belshcurfs Summary View .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), June 2, 1807, page 328, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2381/page/40/
-