On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
But as pv ^ a , does not signify a . person , so neither can > s ^ yo $ in this connexion ; for they are evidently used here as synonymous terms . It is also said in Hcb . i . 3 , that our Lord " upholds all things by the word of his power , " ( pr j ^ ali SvvoiLLSvog ) .
But as pYj ^ a here must signify the spirit or energy of our Lord , &nd not another person ; so , when it is said 44 the worlds were framed ( fTj ^ c xJt Os& 9 Heb . xi . 3 ) by the word of God * " we should under .
stand by it the spirit or energy of God , and not another person distinct from God . Therefore the word and the spirit are the same . And it was before proved that the Father and the Spirit are
one and the same person : con * sequently , the Father , the Word , and the Spirit , are , all three , one and the same person . For if the Spirit of God is the power of God , Or God himself ; and the Word is the , same s& the Spirit ; then the Word also must be the Power or
Spirit of God , or God himself . In other words ; if the first and the third ( the Father and Spirit ) are one ; arid the second and third ( the Word and Spirit ) are also one ; then the first and second
( the Father and Word ) are also one . Consequently the Father , the Word , and Spirit are all three one , which is what was to be proved , and is asserted in the text .
Untitled Article
INFERENCES . istj As the Spirit of God and the Xoyos are the same , and the Spirit is not Jesus Christ , but the power of God ; therefore the
^ oy
2 d , As the im or Xoyog of the Old Testament , by which God made the world , is che power of energy of God , and God cannot be supposed to have employed two Xoyoi in the work of creation , the one a power and the other a
real person ; therefore , the Xoyog mentioned John i . 1-3 , by which # 11 things were made ( admitting that it refers to the creation of the natural world ) must signify a poweF and not a person ; and consequently the \ oyo $ spoken of in John i . 1-3 - cannot mean the
pre-existent soul of Jesus Christ ; and from hence it also follows , 3 d , That nothing can with cer ~ tainty be inferred from our text either in favour of the personality of the spirit or of the deity of our
Lord ; and they who believe this * will be in a good state of mind to > judge of the large bod ^ of evidence that has been brought against the genuineness of this passage , Dcx . ly 1807 .
Untitled Article
100 Criticism on 1 John , v . 7 .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 2, 1808, page 100, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2389/page/44/
-