On this page

• Text (2)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    not the former . Tte same may t& ' -sfeMM of tHe * following ^ lanse , " € ? od was' believed oti Irfl the worftf . " The last ctnuse < fe Gt > d was received tip into * glory , " Is , if possible , rnofe irrectfrreiteable with any principle of - rdason or revelation . We might ask , what

    is meant by God ' s being received up into g lory ? By whom was he received up , &c . &c . ? If this then be the true reading of the passage , I will venture to say there is not any thing in the . New

    Testament either to explain or to justify any one of the assertions of the apostle in this text . In reply to the mere conjecture of the clergyman *< that OX , in the Akxafidrian MS . ( of which MS .

    he' mrhsfelf is probably as pro * . foun # fy ignorant ^ as he professes himself to be of any such reading y § L * & ? ktth was manifested ) ttas ofigtnally 02 , the abbreviated mode of writing GEO 2 , " but that by the hand of time the central rftark df the theta has been

    miraculously obliterated without injuring the circle , ( a very probabler cdnjecture !) I shall add the following observations on the passage from , " Conjectural Emendations 6 n the New

    Testament > ( I believe , by Bowyer ) printed 1763 . (•« ( jcv&igioy G > ec $ £ < po&egcvbif ) 5 £ < pctvsgto&y ) was the reading 6 f all the MSS . before the fifth fcenttlry ; as Sir Isaac Newton hath ahewh . Let . to Le Clerc . Many interpreters at first referred o' to ( AVs-egiov which precedes ; but obs ^ vitig that a mystery could not be received ** $ > iifito gforv , they conn ^ te ^ d & to be the siM ^ ject df wtett follows : T * taV

    which was manifested in the flesh , was justified b y the spirit ,

    Untitled Article

    5 , as 1 John i .. S . John i . 4 . j 4 ^ 4 iii . 26 . 3 * . »« at : ^ hl \ 1 & 9 & m ^ m % . 3 . fVet sfceins Fowm&f ^ &-VFpC ^^ g , ptthW [ & > K $ & ? €$ ^* fW $ fy 4 and for cu < p 8 ^ j afiyeXQifr ^ awt -te ^ Se airorroXot ^ . R . Beiitley . ep k-W # tstein . The different attestations

    of eye-witnesses concetniAg w in the Alexandrian MS . ( soiti ^ affirming the former letter to be Q , some O ) ate accounted fi ^ p- kt last by Professor Wetsteiii ^ who discovered that the cross stroke

    in it ^ which was discerned < v by some , was no other than the tnid * die stroke of the E in EYXEBE& . AN , 1 Tim . vi . 3 . written on thre back page , which appea ^ eli throush the vellum as written dtt tlie O , when held up separately to the light , but was not visible wlien laid flat on the next ieaf /^

    What igno ^ muses irtfust all \\ a < t learned men 1 have referred to , and all the ancients who , before'the fifth century , read , which tms manifested , have been ! that they could not discover what our

    learned divine has discovered , that tha $ reading 6 e < pa , v * gtu $ r } as well -as o $ stpavegw&r }' produced -h ! ownright nonsense , and thierefore ceuffl not be the true reading , though supported by the- authority of every Greek copy during « the fotur first centuries . But we me&t not allow him the whefte' 0 t the merit of this discovery , for it keems

    s'drae wiseacrt made it ;>* n * thte fifth or sixth century , and bbidiy changcd v « into ^ sof . ' ? - - u u Jf " says Archbpw Newcorrie * , a we read £ y , he wk » , we haVe a constrhctioh like- Mian m * 5 . Ltike viu . 18 ; Rt > m . vifi . SZf > But had Ms Lordslvip consulted our learned clergyman he would have told him that that fcould not

    Untitled Article

    J , M . ' s Reply to the Clergyman on the Divinity qfi ^ hrist . . | $£

    Untitled Article

    ? In Idc .

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), March 2, 1808, page 137, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2390/page/17/