On this page

• Text (4)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    I here take leave of the controversy , not being in the least degree ambitious of having the last word . And I cannot better

    conclude , than with congratulating the Socinians on the great accession of strength which their cause is likely to derive from the

    Untitled Article

    &R . MARSOM S DEFENCE OF THE PRE-EXISTENCE OF CHRIST ; IX REPLY TO MR . BELSHAM . LEtTER I .

    Untitled Article

    To the Editor of the Monthly Repository .

    sir , Jlyril 20 , 1808 . The high esteem and veneration I entertain for Mr . Belsham on ticeount of his theological knowledge , his superior talents , his -critical skill and intrepid -boldness in the defence of what he

    conceives to be truth , would incline me , were I not a stranger , which I ever wish to be , to implicit faith , to submit with little hesitation to liis decisions ; but as I ajn taught

    to call no man master upon earth , to follow the convictions of my own mind , and to dissent from every man where I think his arguments weak and inconclusive , y « u

    will not wonder if I attempt to point out what appears to me erroneous in a writer of whom I have a very high opinion and for whom I feel the most sincere

    respect . When I first read Mr . B . ' s observations on the pre-existence of Jesus Christ in his two last letters to Mr . Carpenter , I felt that impression which his , mode of -reasoning is calculated to produce ; this led me to read them with

    Untitled Article

    critical prowess of their redoub f - able champion J . M . on the one hand , and the stern integrity of

    that virtuous and consistent ttntiidolater Mr . Stone on the other , I am your obedient humble servant , CLER . DUN ELM ,

    Untitled Article

    more close attention in order te examine the solidity of thd arguments with which he combats that doctrine ; the result of that

    examination I now submit to you for insertion in the Repository , if you think it deserving

    attention-Mr . B . first notices a concession of Mr . Carpenter ' s * , " which " fC

    he says , however creditable to his candour , is , I scruple npt to

    say , fatal to his argument . ' * That concession is , I shall readily acknowledge that there is nothing decisive upon this subject in the first three evangelists , " and again , iC

    I do acknowledge that it there was no other part of the New Testament extant , but the three gospels of jVtatthew , Mark and Luke , I could not find sufficient evidence

    for the doctrine which I am now maintaining / ' Now 1 would ask , supposing that doctrine to be true , will it necessarily follow that the silence of three of the evangelists respecting it \ yill be , fatal to the arguments * drawn from the express declarations of the fourth in support of the doctrine ? The thvee

    Untitled Article

    Mr . Marsoin ' s Defence of the Pre-existence of Christ . 3 Y 9

    Untitled Article

    ? M . Repo ? , vol . U . p . 54 * -

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1808, page 379, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2394/page/27/