On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
therefore speaks plainly to him : but , if he had spoken as plainly to his disciples , when the traitor Judas was amongst them , he would
have given his enemies a handle for an accusation , which they without fail would have used ; it was his prudence to guard himself from their snares .
At his trial , it is said , that Jesus made a full confession of himself . I have very great doubts in my own mind on this subject : but allowing that he did , what does his confession amount to ?
The high priest asks him ; art thou the Christ , the Son of the blessed ? Pilate asks ; art thou a king ? Our Saviour answers , according to the common interpretation , I am .
In this case it appears , that he gave testimony only to that truth , for which he came into the world ; namely , that he was the Messiah , the expected king of the Jews . If the miracles which he had
wrought , could not convince the Jews of the truth of his mission , we need not be surprised , that his own declaration had no effect upon them . When all the charges
they could bring against him were of no avail , he was adjudged to be worthy of death , tfor declaring himself to be the Christ , the Son of God .
But I would ask any person , who reads attentively the history of our Saviour ; is it not very extraordinary , that , the priests should be so much at a loss to
find an accusation against ; him , when modern Christians tell us , -that he declared publicly to rtfce Jewv that ihe was . Goad ? Would *« tt * ey have putt -hUn to / dgatih ; for pretending to he . tbe ; Christ , if they had sway Evidence of his pre ~ * ea « iom-to po much higher a cha-
Untitled Article
racter ? Is k possible therefore , that he , who till his trial never avowed himself publicly to the Jews to be tbe Christ , is it possible I say , that he should have
given them so fair a charge against himself ; and , that they , who were taking all the pains in the world to accuse him , should pever hear of it ? It is in the highest degree improbable ; but let us hear , what foundation there is for such
an opinion . The chief grounds for this opinion I find , sir , from your 4 t 9 * course to be , that Jesus called God his Father , and was undqrstood by the Jews to make
hinaself God : that he said , I and my father are one , and No man knoweth the son , but the father , su&d who the father is , but the sou * I have already proved , that nothing can be deduced in fawur of your doctrine from the use of the teem
Son of God , and > by parity 91 reasoning , I might conclude that when Christ said God was his father , he meant nothing mojpe than in the other phrase , I am the Son of God But l ^ st this
reasoning should not convince you , the words of Christ and $ * e Jews may have > better success . Christ called God his , tfiuhes ; so the Jews called God their father . We have one father , even God . Why docs . Christ deny , that God was their father ?
because say £ he , if God were-your father , ye would love me , Whom God . sent * JVnd why doesn he eatl 4 be-dewl JnsteLid of < if <* d theirJh « ( tfet&irf ( Ueeause / tixey wem * full o £ d *~
. viiish lusts , and actied lite children , of % e d ^ vil , the lather of li e ** Hence it I 9 evident , that : / ChatiaC called God his iathftr , because 4 m& >^> okft ? -whai J * eibad jn *« ii > fic *
Untitled Article
On the Testimony of the Jews to the Tersonpf Christ . Letter 7 * 545
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1808, page 543, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2397/page/19/
-