On this page
- Departments (1)
- Text (3)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
to an injured and insulted people , that the most rigorous inquiry into such disgraceful expeditions should be instituted . This amendment was seconded by Mr , Ward , "who wondered , that after such a scries of unexampled calamities , the ministers , over the greater part of whom the terrors of impeachment were
impending , should dare to remain in office . Against the enemy every operation of their ' s proved abortive v it vas only in their attacks upon friends , as at Copenhagen , that their measures were not characterized by failure . But how could it be otherwise , when the time which
ought to have been employed in the public service , was devoted to dark Machiavelian intrigues , and in devising schemes for parcelling out the public departments . Mr . Ward then went into a detail of the different expeditions , but he attributed all the calamities and
disasters he complained of to the house : they were the consequence of the measures of men after its own heart , men that would fill up the peerage in reward of useless victories , and send out forces to treacherous or unwilling allies , whilst they exhausted the means of our own defence at home . Lord Kensington could not concur vrith either address or
amendment , the latter pledging the house without sufficient inquiry . Mr . Lushington imputed the failures in Spain not to ministers , but to the Spaniards themselves , and reprobated the refusal of the persons invited to accede to Jiis majesty ' s councils . Mr . B . Bathurst could not support either the address or amendment . Mr .
Ponsonby vindicated the amendment , stating , that the situation of the country was perilous in the extreme , and these facts not only warranted , but compelled the house to institute an inquiry into the causes of its calamities . Lord Castlereagh professed to court
inquiry , vindicated JLord Wellington / stating that the Dutch expedition was intended as a coup de main against the French naval force at Antwerp , but of its failure his peculiar situation prevented him from speaking , but his own concern in it he wished to be submitted to the most
1809 . May ao . At Rochester , where he had been the minister of the Presbyterian congregation for 35 years , the Rev . JOHN ALEXANDER , aged 68 .
rigorous examination . Mr . Canning was anxious for inquiry , where it would not be prejudicial to the interests of the country ; and he should suspend his opinion on the propriety of it , till proper documents had been laid before parliament . As to a particular affair , ( namely
his own base conduct , and the consequent duel , ) he thought , that the dignity and the decency of the house , and the respect due to the feelings of individual members , should prevent the discussion of such a subject , into which no provocation whatever should induce him to
enter . Mr , Whitbread properly replied to the last speaker , that he had to answer to the country , why he suffered his antagonist to remain in office , when he Was so convinced of his defects , and he trusted that this would on a future day be made the subject of substantial inquiry * and answers should be extorted from him on his conduct . He then
entered into the conduct of the war , and spoke with the utmost contempt of the ministry , than whom , considering their ignorance , imbecility , bigotry , or the fate with which providence visits their * measures , our enemy , had he the nomination , could not select men more suitable to his endsj or more pernicious to our interests . Mr . Perceval defended
his measures ; lamented that his offers to the opposition were not accepted , and stated that his present situation was not his own choice , but he thought himself bound in duty not to desert his sovereign in times of extraordinary emergency . The house divided , when there ^ appeared for the amendment a hundred and sixty seven , against it two hundred and sixty three .
-The violent language on the conduct of ministers was naturally to be expected . The division did not surprise any one . The appearance and conduct of the two duellists , Lord Castlereagh and Mr . Canning , formed a marked feature in the present session . No symptoms appeared in either of contritionfor their dishonourable conduct , for their dereliction of duty to their God , their king , and their country .
He was "born an London * in the year 1741 . At a very early age , hs wa » sent into Scotland for education , where he resided seven years . Upon bi « return t *
Obituary * 43
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1810, page 43, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2400/page/43/