On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
necessity * and we foijner jprocepding * mm | I > « ce 3 ent fof"i ^ ebndatt S wb »; ^ ^ ilw ^' SHt ^ ' ; a : *» f aafoi asd that cwUyTJtxm me reptesentaudm of die plwsicians exaJtoned be * fo ^ i , e w ^ V councBf SS&e : « rf ^ noffisMfc spo £ f £ I ^^^ rwtion w * i * ? £ < rvte » - ' V- ** t-3 »» . ' * : ' v ' . * i * . «** . . -- .-. yy- . -s .. v . . -, ; . . . ,, mvfsuroi
carried witntmt a fir the < 2 oinftiotis Jfhc Chancellor df the fejcchemfcr ' wem fcvtr tKe same groj& | f as tEc Cliaticeitor in flie Lords , fWtSfeT tliSF fe liiid icrW ^ « hat r-wr itiofhm ^ at ^ W ^ dsor , ¥ to asccrurn * fcc nideiit ItSiB ol "fiis ISKrcstyV heakh . jbf
whfirfe fie ftad , t&c ^ ati ^ factioii ttweiv- ' ine wte ananimowoBtmion of the physiciatis * that nis M ^^ ty 8 he alth ^ was in a state of pro ^ rfissivc aat <; ntlnieDt ; and as DoBRnig redmrca the in ^ m ^ atje aid or Pa ^^^ it ^ ie mb % cdy thaj the house sh ^ '" ^ i <* o |^ iVr a ; ! fbrtai ]| ht . Mr . ^ tttpreaa ifiougiit \ tfrafc tjic-ministw had hot dofie their duty in the summons of that
iss ^ H for Ac appearance hijemtjers on the ^ f&v feu t acSrio ^ id ^ ged l £ he fi alJ ^ JfC in fKeTHoiise ^ flm day , he jshoSlUp ^ e ^ otM i ^ r the ft ^ jouniraent . Thg ^ iSb , nw tnet to yerfcrai the du ^ s ' ; Jj ^ d ^ required : an ^^ ySt'aii ac ^ tirnment is proposed without rejeorded evidence , without aiithentic testimony , in short , upon the bar ^ s irik $ # cuife bi Wb Rfeje ^ ty > minis-^ rf ;;; WM ;^ ai | &r ^ e Jpri ^ y ; council assemble ^ why v ^ no ^ Ae pltysi w « $ examined ? iSto necessity wou ) d appear
on tfie journals for thU adjournment , and the House would « ecm to have lost sight pf its dignity by this proceeding . He contrasted " « % K great severity the conduct of die present mmisters , with that ctf the i ^ but #
th oi ^ iLMiie ^ iDbjefetei strongly to the adjouriThient , he declared that he should not divide the hou ^ e upon it . Sit Frahcis Bwdctt agreed in most that had beeto u&ct ^ h y the last speik * w , hat declared , that should he stand alohe ^ hcw ^ uld divide the Hotwe ; nor woiild he consent , that the regal dignity tobtthrlic * raHe 4 wirft * in this niana «\
Thcjr were ta a ^ tiro upon w ^ iat—3 > qa ti ^^ ijMi ;' c tBppt " ctf the minister . « g ^ 'iHw : W :- iftafce the public bclw ^ M allthcfiinctionsaF tie regal office ^ igfit bt rterforniid "by ministers : that Acte iyj ^ ibc ^ ^ hil at urikeld W such stmtoort < jn . lie tt ^ GpBESUi"Wit& & ^ m ^ for th <; 5 ### ^§ alito of ^ s iiwj ^ ty * Wt ¦ ¦
Untitled Article
they owed to both king and people . A ed the ccratmy to mat 4 acigeir ^ MMl » be Hotise wtiterndwliithtsnfwki ^ iniprxdi ^ iK'T inent , becautea former Hou ^ eJted nm done its duty , cand had teft thi « « n « ifa » t defect un ^ rimded for . Nat th «*; dw »* was any diffienlty in the oUin courdr o £
duty , ttor would he have trrvr ^ opsent ^ to t ^ measure prdp < teed agikkist ki ^ royal highnw the Prince of Wale # » He should resist t ^ at course , if it was intended to be pursued t and , thonfh the ministers might b « ^ re solved to pi ?©*^ long to the utmost limit the tex » we , oa
which they held the » places ^ he would not go bank to the people to tell tbftfe * that after the C 4 > nstkwtioo had b ^« t * tt ^ pended for a fortnight , ^ ih ^ 0 B © t « 4 that it should be suspended for a iortir
night longer , - " ? - fe ^ o ? Mr < Tierney could not t ^ ake the ba # « word of any man , as the groupd for % parliamentary proceeding , and v * hatev * sfepstj > c House might pursue ^ it oUight to be upon authentic evidence , tord A >
Hamilton was decidedly of opinion tha ^ the House ought to adjourn only from < lay to day , nor would he believfi that , if this calamity had been foreseen , th e ^ adjourniaent required by the minister , could be pkasing to hie Majesty . JVlr * Ponsonby did not approve ^^ laailJis * tcr ' s mode of proceedimr , and wiahed
that even , one physician pnly had h ? eQ examined : but that the House mign ^ not appear to be wanting in respect a ^ wt affection for his Majesty , he w « Mild ?« Gt * vote -against the ¦^ viBtkumm '^^ b ^ - ^^ ning thought that time ought * o be given for the com |> d 8 urc of the royal mind , spatium reqmemque xlolpji «^ and
therefore supported the motion . Mr . vC - Wynne statcd ^ hatin the raanoer ^ tn wh ^ ch the House was met , nothing hut paramount necessity could justify any one act—their fiist object , therefore , wght to be to establish that necessity , an 4 then it would become a question o £ ex * pediency » whether they shouid pracocd
to business or adjourn . Mr . ' Soyridw stated , that "th » was t | ie founth Jskaejlj . which his I ^ ajeaty h&d been attacked 4 % the same mamier , and he ihouid vote for the question v OB tt * premiinptiac thgt Jf it passed , pll ftinher discuwwm on tW »
calamitous subject would J » rc ^ oerq unoeoe «« tery . ' '' ' ¦/ ^ t ;^ v : ^ ^ Sit Samuel Romilly Buppo ^ d PIT Francis Burdctt ^ c ^ j 0 cuon oWerviof that thac wa » no l # 9 tip )| - /| ph » 4 hi
Untitled Article
^ i ? Lisf J ^ ih ^ JF ?**?* S ?
Untitled Article
?• i- W ' '¦ ?• ' V 'A ¦' ¦ XI ' ' <' : ' ¦' ' •"** " ¦ ¦ '¦ ' ' «? " '¦¦? ' ¦ ¦<• >• : ' »
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Nov. 2, 1810, page 565, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2410/page/41/
-