On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
agreement with the members occasioned his resignation in 1770 , from which time till his death he had no connection with thenu In 1750 he published the first edition of his Introduction to the New Testament . This was his favourite work ; he laboured
incessantly to enlarge and improve it , and his own maturer * thoughts and the discoveries of his contemporaries furnished him with so much new matter , that the 4 th edition , which Marsh translated , is a totally different book from the first . There is no instance on
record , we believe , of a book retaining the same title , and being so completely re * written in successive editions : the fact shows , in a very striking light , the progression of our author ' s knowledge ,., the imperfection of this branch of sacred criticism in the
middle of the last century , and its rapid advances during the latter half of it . In 1758 he published an edition of Lowth ' s Prelections , with notes and Epimetra , one of his works which first made him known in
England , in consequence of its being reprinted at the Clarendon Press . No two men could undertake the same work with more different qualifications than Michaelis and Lowth . The bishop
was a man of refined taste , but formed entirely upon classical models ; he was an elegant writer of Latin prose , and a ready composer of Latin verse : but knowing no oriental language except the Hebrew , and not being familiar with the manners and customs of
the East 9 he judged of the sacred writers by a classical standard and European ideas- Michaelis , on the dther hand , had very little
Untitled Article
taste , wrote stiff Latin , and had never received a good classical education . But he was an accomplished orientalist ; he could discover in the kindred dialects the meaning of an obscure Hebrew word , which Lowth would alter by conjecture ; he could understand the local allusions of the sacred writers , and estimate their merits more rationally than by comparing them with Greek and Latin authors . His notes were
therefore a most valuable supplement to Lowth s Prelections , and both together continue to be the best introduction that we have to
Hebrew poetry . In 1760 he gained the prize of the Academy of Berlin by his essay 4 * on the influence of opinions on language and language on opinions . " This work intro - duced him to the notice ^ f Frederic the Great and D'Alembert . tn the same year he published his u Compendium Theologias Dogmaticae . " Although not professor
of theology , he had lectured on it for several years , and was accused of being a Calvinist . The orthodoxy of his Compendium , however , past unquestioned in Germany ; but the University of Upsal discovered it to be unsound , and confiscated a Swedish
translation of iL Eighteen years afterwards , the Chancellor of this University , abhamed of its illiberal ] ty 9 persuaded the King to bestow the Order of the Northern Star on the Professor , as a national compensation for the injury he had sustained .
Nothing contri buted more-to raise the fame of MichaSlis throughout Europe , than the questiom which he addressed irt the year 1762 , to the learned men , appointed by
Untitled Article
Sketch of the Life of Michaelis . 5
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1811, page 5, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2412/page/5/
-