On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    not 6 tily W ^ ttt to prove thci right ve ^ fed in ( he trustees , but also to ttffttwbl&rrie where blame has been nidit ' QotisffiCnovLily due . &ut it ] was riot thotr&fet necessary , by flie ]

    £ 6 iafts £ I who were etnployed , to go into ft . TBe legal title was proved froni the original trtfet-deeds , the discover ^ of which , in a very unexpected manner , rendered the action perfectly safe ; and it was liie opinion of Mr . Justice Grose , that

    no doubt fexisted , as to its being in £ &e trustees , and that , therefore ^ a yeWlrct rritrst b ' 6 given for the plaintiffs . " A'fegal objection , however ardse ^ tfpbtf k point which is of pectfliar interest to the trustees of

    pisseriling chapels , and , indeed , to all trustees of public charities . The original trustees bad ' all died without having complied with the intention of the donor , that when ivTo ^ ere ** cfcadV the other three ftboird renew the trust ; and the

    h £ ir at law of the surviving trustee renewed it in the year 1761 . A similar irregularity was also discoVk / ed , ' in the other renewals , in 17 / 2 ^ > ti < J -179 & ' * when only two tfnsttes survived . It was argued

    tip 6 ii this , that the terrhs not having been complied with , the trust ha * d beeri riiade void , arid the property had reverted into the estate . T * he j ud ^ e , however , was of opi-71 } 6 fi , that the legal estate ivas in th ^ hefr at law of the surviving to

    trustee , who h ^ ad a Jiower re-Jiew tjie trtfst *; therefore that liis t € h ^ waV w&s' vaAfcI ; but allowed | fii defer / darit M make it ^ ca ^ e for

    tttk ^ dj&bi ifi ' vti rhbre mature £ 6 xkU&kiteTi ; wtA <) uia tftmi : re yfesWBK V * * - * " ^ question rlsp ^ t j tig * HV estate beirig * ftus ArdV - ' tli » dtetett 4 ahlfs co ^ infeel tt ^ % * 3 « wtfuito * to ^ ot ^ , that the chapei was a parfet ^ cbtttc b ?

    Untitled Article

    } j ] ' K W T « an * co # fT 6 €% e ^^* 0 |^ ^ fey ariy m \ vidua ^ > a ^ fm f ** tf ^ * h 5 Bandse ^^ ni ^ i ^ r ^ , i f !

    proofs vff&m 4 ei ¥ ; \ &&t&& ? B ft- a belt to calP" ^ jfe * j ^ f «> wdfship , a ^ er ^ 6 l d ^ m x ^ WW ^ y ^^ kiiiki , registers of m % ? n § jjj > &p fattbs Aiid deaths ^ -dburi ^^^ wdlS ^ 'itli ^ - ^ ver . seers , a pulpit , iold ^ r thhw the time in which DissehteiisliaVebeea known , a * id the ministers have

    usually called themselves curates . —Had the counsel on tlie side ' of the plaintiffs thought it proper ; they might easily have ssfiewn ^ hsfc these are no prbofsr of its " Beirig a parfsh church , and th ^ J in point o £ feet , iri

    it has never beeri re ^ aFdecf that light , but always a % a > 'Eiisfcefttmg meeting , licensed accoroittg to law : but tBey thougfrt it ti ^ st to wave a replyf seeing t-hslt the fo ^ l -

    ings of the court \ vere against them ; and under their ^ gge&tioi $ the plaintiffs thought it rriosi ^ prkdent to take a verdict for the estite , ind defer the question of tfieir 44 ] $ * fc to the chapel for anbther ai&fea *^'

    Farther Partie ^ &r&tftjffifGfang ^ fie Family of the : J ? fatefyg rwi ' . In the y € ar t 69 ^ 5 ^ sftvail hook

    was published by . Mr / Baifciel Efisney , with an introdLfctoryaHBres ^ to the reader ^^ by the JleW ' Saftiuei Slater . It w ^ s v ^ i tfert byr . Mr . Gervase Dj ^ hej ^ v and d ^ tfteate d ci to his ijear 4 vifei b&m ^ tred ' ido ^

    ^ Since the ab <* v& Was ' Wi ? itfen 5 fe . Reader moved the Coiji-t ^^ KlngN Bench for a new triaj ^ fltatin ^ hl ? groOpcls before Lord Ellenborjovgll r I pr « umc

    they were tbe illegality , of the , trusta > which had nat been fin ^ H ujp agrfeeably to the instructions of ^ tte ( Wr . But his lordshi p * without ^ sKing ^^ fiv , CKpjanation , or mkin ^ ^ C 9 m ^ p > of ^ fr . JuaticcjL Grose , wlao ?^ t h jf m ^ ? i dc , &vc for answer , that thfcre tv ^ tiot ioffiocnt rcahon for gtanting a tm ^ imftoonan

    Untitled Article

    r ... ** JH ^^ zr stating td XVHPil ^ fe ' »¦•¦

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Feb. 2, 1813, page 84, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2425/page/4/