On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    tony in a , letter addressed to myself by F . P . The reply , p . 498 , may also be totill in their memory Such readers will naturally . expect some further information from , the reverend author of the first Letter . Yesterday . I received a very friendly and respectful letter from that gentleman upon the subject ; which I

    intended immediately to have forwarded to you , Mr . Editor , but with surprise and concern , find ways * If precluded from so doing , by the following sentence at the conclusion : " After . another long letter , which I hope you will forgive , I have only particularly to request that

    you will not think of putting this into the Repository , or to publish it in any form . I really had not the least intention of publishing the first—I intended it onjy for yourself . But Mr . * contrived to persuade me ; though I had no idea at any rate of seeing my name at full length in the Repository . "

    This request has , of course , placed me iaja situation of difficulty and delicacy , especially in consequence of the more extended circulation and permanent imjiressifcn which will be produced by Mr . BelslianVs reference to the statement in

    the following note in his highly interesting and , valuable work , Memoirs of t ; he late Rev T . Lindsey ; " p . 374 . " A very correct , certainly , not a partial account'of the present state of professed Unitariaoism iu the state of the

    Massachusetts ,, and particularly in Boston , has fa % ely been published in the Monthly depository for March and April , I 8 lz , in a letter addressed by my highly esteemed friend , the Reverend Francis Porkman , of Boston , to the Rev . John Crundy , in reply to a flattering account of the state of TJfiitarianism in Boston

    and its vicinity , contained in the Appendix to Mr . Grundy ' s eloquent discourse at the opening of a aew jplace of worship at Liverpool . This account appears to have been communicated to my worth y friend , by some person whose zeal in a good cause led him to see the objects of his wish in rather too favourable a lights * I am inclined to think that if the

    wofih y minister in Boston ( to whom I ' gTeatfy regret that I had no opportunity of being introduced , during his stay in England , ) had seen this note and known the effect produced by his statement , he would not have precluded roe from publishing ^ , at foil length , a letter which 4 o $ & Jion ^ r ^ cr his candour and truly fihristian principles and feelings . The

    Untitled Article

    existing state of the two countries renders any communication so extremely difficult , that I despair of obtaining in any reasonable time , his permission to make it public . Under , these circumstances all that I feel myself permitted to say is , —that Mr . P ' s private letter to

    me , is perfectly satisfactory upon almost every point . But as you , Mr . Editor , are a friend to both , 1 take the liberty of inclosing the letter for your perusal . I am , Sir , Your ' s very respectfully , J . GRUNDY .

    Boston , March 18 th , 1813 . Your remarks , my dear Sir * afford another instance of the value of a little explanation to remove , or at least , greatly to diminish our differences in opinion . For I readily confess , that had I understood your term Unitarianism , in the extended sense you gave it in your letter ,

    1 . e . as opposed only to Trinitarianism > I should not have troubled you with any objections of mine . I really thought , that the purport of the note" was to represent the prevailing sentiment in Boston as Humanitarian . On any other view , I own , that my statement would not have been correct .

    You adduce the passage from yon sermon , to which the note is annexed ; and it gives , indeed , a much more liberal and extended interpretation . Had it been in the note , I should not have found much difficulty . But the truth is , that having , rather hastily , read the sermon , I replied to the note , as it stood by itself .

    Your friend ' s account appearing to me quite distinct 5 and understanding his use of the word Unitarian , as I found it most commonly used in England , and as , indeed , it is too frequently used among us , as perfectly synonymous with Humanitarian ^ I . thought his account thus understood , conveyed , as I am sure

    it would , a very erroneous statement * I certainly did not designedly substitute the one for the other , or give a wrong interpretation , for the sake of rin&ng ^ fault . You are aflrare , my dear Sir , that the term Unitarian , however improperly

    and unjustly , has been exclusively claimed by the followers of Socinus , or of Dr . Priestley ; with much the same pro * priety as the names " orthodox , " and •« evangelic" have been assumed , by , | he Calvimsts . I was only yielding to common use , to avoid circumlocution > and

    Untitled Article

    Intelligence . —Unitarianism in America . 470

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1813, page 479, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2430/page/55/