On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
cormriend , in ooe vieto ^ some of thetn .- -whose religious sentiments greatly differ from hit own / * ft is my decided frpittfcfl , " Wlys ha , ( p . \ && % ** that the differences among su * ch Protestant churches as deserve the name of orthodox , en never be insisted
oil to any £ 6 od purpose , unless the tfe-Ijresrntsdtiort of them be accompanied with the statement of other important collateral truths , —such as , that the < lijierences , ' either entire ! y , or nearly ,
respect subordinate matters ; that there i # an'agreement among them in rejefcti $£ the grand terrors and cbrruptioris of % kc church of Rome ; and that ; there is a further agreement in the iundaineu . at doc tribe * bf Christian faith and
ffftttiefr . " ** In regard to such : classed of Frotestant * as are not esteemed orthodox in / heir tenets , \ judge it better to be sfterrt . £ or although I ani far frotu bein ^ disposed to speik of the m either vrith animosity or disrepect , my knowledge of their several peculiarities in
doctrine docs not enable me to make tfei ? requisite distinctions Without some gattgeti of misrepresentation . The cooperation , however * of the Sociqsans with the other friends of the Bible So-, < yety . ' w the good work of disseminating Bibles , appears to me to be a notable instance of candour and
modisfatxoo » wortby of the notice of believers of all denominations . They art supposed , in general , to prefer a different vct 5 i ^ i > of the fileriptures ; but if they ha ^ fc , grtfen up the Iester consideration for the sake of disseminating Bibles with greater , advantage , churchmen Purely will both be glad of the event , 2 nd approve of thfe principle that led to iV »
We knoW tohom the Dean iht ^ h ds to designate by the appeJliitiort the Socinians : and we should not have been sorty if , in this ittstartce at least , he had tnade
those enquiries , and been acquainted witli those distinctions ^ which ** rould haVsj guarded hi m ifrom llit possibility bf mitfrepre&entfng
•¦ r * * * * «* /
Untitled Article
their ** rieculiariLiea in doctrine \" —r-a sort < of ^ accui ^ icy-eii 4 justice that we xuight the catber have expected fro « i oDey much ^ f uhose time and Attention has b ^ en
devoted to the bistt > ry of th& . Cbribtian ehurcki * The main foxt bow . ever is such as he describes it . Unr ' &rianS ) in comdran ^ vith many ttilighteaed mcfi , both in and out of the EstabUshmenl , do not
acknowledge the infaHibility of Kin ^ James ' s translation ; yet , feeling as strong an attachnient to revelation und it * records as any of those * whether conformists or
nonconformists ^ Mrho ^ m our author ' s judgmentv . deserve tike nairw of orthodox ? they are willing to join in the most practicable mea . sures for the circulation of ikt
scriptures ^ . . -., * There is nothing in the present volume which we m ^ fe , dibap . prove than the Bagepjiess of tb « Dean of Carlisle to animadvert on
former put > licatio « sc > fDr * M ^ rsbs . We shall not deity < th $ t ifaose pub . locations may be fairly open to eens ^ re ; rot , ^ utiveTsaljly ^ ^ eouW we controvert the stricUures which
they have received from this writer . But we decidedly protest against the practice of an author ' s professing to answer * solely dr mainly , certain positions of an antagonist upon a certain subject ,
and ylet availing himself of that opportunity ofqSe $ frtdnin £ hi $ / rne . tm in othdr d 6 ^ artmen ts of literature and of ^ r mi gning his arguments upon foVeigA topics . Dr . Marsh , it is trtie , fa ^ d throw ^ out whkt the Pise * fttent of Queers is fttiirl of denominating a chatteH * : Ire had asked , ** WlietWr his op-¦ --- - A • i ¦ ^ r
• B . a 7 a , * 74 .
Untitled Article
610 Review + Milncr a Reply to the Rev . Dr . Mnrth
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Sept. 2, 1813, page 610, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2432/page/50/
-