On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
REVIEW. * Still pleaa'd to praise, yet not afraid to blame. — Pope.
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
( 787
Untitled Article
Art . I . A Reply to the Strictures of the Rev . Isaa ^ Milner , £ >• Z > . Dean of Carlisle , &c By Herbert Marsh , D . D . F . R . S . Margaret Professor of Divinity in Cambridge . Cambridge ^
printed . Sold by Rivingtons , London : 1813 . 8 vo . pp . 41 . Appendix , pp . 29 . The question really at issue between Dr . Marsh and his opponents , in the controversy relating to the Bible Society , is whether it be consistent with the
obligations of the ministers and members of a Protestant established church to join an institution which proposes to itself the exclusive object of circulating the Holy Scriptures ? This inquiry , already replied to in the
affirmative by the Scottish clergy , some of the disputants have , nevertheless , forgotten , in their attention to those minor points of debate , and , we are sorry to add ,
altercation into which they have been betrayed . The accusation eminently applies to Dean Milner in hisStrictures > &c : and it holds good in an inferior degree of the Margaret Professor .
iC Nothing / * says our author ( p . 1 . ) , would have induced me to write again on that now exhausted aubject ( the Bible Society ) , if I had not been compelled by the most extraordinary piece ot controversial divinity , which ever issued from the pi ess . "
After a sketch of his former antibiblical labours , after a bbort narrative * in the course of which
he tells us that the Prayer Book is Ci the bulwark of the established church / ' * he states it ( 4 ) as the avowed object of Dr . Milner ' s Strictures to depreciate his opponent in the estimation of the public .
Then follows , first , a complaint , for aught we know not unreasonable , of the period which the said Doctor selected for laying them before the world , and , next , a censure , which we are sure he richly deserves , for introducing much irrelevant matter into the
controversy . With these charges is mixed a poignant sarcasm on the silence of the Lucasian professor from his chair : and we have afterwards a formal accusation against him for advisedly and unnecessarily bringing forward
certain passages in the polemical history of his antagonist . Passing 61 from grave to gay , " Dr . Marsh laughs , and raises a laugh , atone chapter of the Strictures , which is entitled The Dean of Carlisle ' s Infirmities ; upon which topic h « thus comments ( 7 , 8 ) :
* ' Now what connexion there can be between his Strictures and his infirmities , or what connexion his infirmities can have with the Bible Society , 1 am utterly at a lose to comprehend ; though . I can easily see , that if Dr . Milner ,
instead ot " confin » ng the title of Infirmities to a single chapter , had made it the title of his whole book , it would have perfectlysuited the contents . But however consistent it may be with the elegant feelings ot Dr . Milner , to inform the pub-* See also p . 38 .
Review. * Still Pleaa'd To Praise, Yet Not Afraid To Blame. — Pope.
REVIEW . * Still pleaa'd to praise , yet not afraid to blame . — Pope .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1813, page 787, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2435/page/35/
-