On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
BIBLICAL CRITICISM.
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Biblical Criticism.
BIBLICAL CRITICISM .
Untitled Article
iDr . Lloyd ' s Answer to Mr . Jones ' s Vindication of the Common Greek Text in Acts ^ xx . 28 . Indoctorum aut iniquorum judicia contemnere licebit . Prasterea , criticus sitoportct , qui de hoc rerutn genere
sententiam ferre sustmet . Criticis autem ~ a judicando nomen inditum esse constat . Gtuapropter , cui judicii deest subtilitas atque acumen , —criticus alio sensu appetlari nequit , quam quo lucum a non lucendo dictum esse grammatici quidam perhibuerunt . Griesbach .
Sir , The ill luck , to which I owe it that my answer to Mr * Jones ' s last paper on Acts xx » 28 , was mislaid , has occasioned me no small degree of vexation and labor , and must be attended with this
effect , that the subject has lost its interest with me and the pub . lie , « which will probably cause me t ^ resume my e ffort with a degree of languor that will still increase the readers indifference . At the
same time , your learned readers will , probably , think that some apology is due to them , for taking any notice at all of that paper ;
and even those who do not strictly range under the appellation , having now before them , in English , tjhe most important part of Griesbach ' s celebrated note on the
text in question , must perceive that a reply is next to superfluous , and that the office assigned me is , $ imply , that of slaying the slain . I hope , however , for pardon , when I assure each of them that I have
important reasons , that need not to be explained , for submitting to them the following aoimadverlions .
Untitled Article
In my last communication , I refrained from pursuing the ad ** vantages which Mr . J . ' s inadequate discussion of the subject in
dispute had furnished . Too much room would have been taken up for that purpose , and it was my sincere wish to spare my oppo * nent * Although the temper witfe which he has now written would
fairly release me from much cere - mony , self respect will still re * frain me , and induce me to con * - tinue to speak with all possible tenderness .
Mr . J- commences his attack on Griesbach with paying a rather awkward compliment to my le&ra * ing , which he cannot help qualify ^ , ing by accusing me of a want of candour . This accusation is to
me quite unintelligible . My candour must have been excessive ^ indeed , had it led me to succumb under the weight of arguments which were demonstrably shewn to be altogether erroneous , and to be founded either on a want of
learning , or on illogical deduction . The framer of them hat , prudently , left their defence unaU tempted , and will , assuredly , nevetf repeat them . To the gift of prophecy I had not pretended , and could not have foreseen what Mr *
J # would write . What he had written was disposed of for ever . It will soon be seen what must bethe fate of this last production . Before the conclusion of his
first paragraph , we are told that he will proceed to establish the purity of the common text in Acts xx . 28 , 5 < to the confuiio *
Untitled Article
( 38 )
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1814, page 38, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2436/page/38/
-