On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
particular are excellent interpreters ' - of the pettal code . * Some of these crimes , ' * says he , " are of such & nature , that they seem to
include others which are not ex . pressly rnentioned , but which the gobd sense of offenders , and espe - cially the priests , would evidently see to ) be comprehended in them . ft is neither necessary nor prudent
to spetify every possible breach of general laws / ' Had my worthy friend lived in the golden days of thfeTudors or the Stuarts , when byulty had no harm in it , and Hgh-chtirch politics were in fahis
shit ^ courtly doctrine could hartH y haVe failed to be rewarded with a mitre . Happily we live in Other times ; and under the mild sw&y of the House of Brunswick , priests have long ceased to be the
official expounders of the laws . Nor can this be regarded as a just subject 6 f regret . I declare , for my own part ^ that I would much rathfef that the Blasphemy Act shoiild be expounded by the sound
Icgalknowledge of Lord Ellenborough , than by the good sense of Bishop Burgess , who is evidently Very much disposed to include Wider it , many offences which are
not expressly mentioned in it . That the good sense of the offenders should , as my worthy friend conceives , be employed in extending the limits and increasing the severities of a penal statute ,
would , I'believe , be quite an anomaly in the history of criminal law ; but that the priests , in the case supposed , should be willing to extend the operation of the law
to cases not expressly mentioned 10 it , and likewise to increase the value of the penalties , is far from kirig improbable , because the atonements or fines provided by
Untitled Article
the law , were chiefly the perdtiisites of the priesthood , and applied the table of the cJaSs Whose turn it was to be in attencJMhce .
And this consideration may possibly account ^ or the ex jpetisi ^ e nature of some of-the sacrifices , which it appears from the history were offered in after times , tfiougli not required by positive law .
Upon the whole , atonement under the M 6 saic institute , is generally used to express the rite by which things or persons are transferred from an unconsecrated to a
consecrated or holy state . Irl the two instances in which atonement is required for voluntary offences , it is to be regarded as an addltfbn to the civil penalty , which the defender must submit to , previously to his being restored to his state
in civil society , and has no respect whatever to the moral quality of the offence . Expiation for moral offences is never required in the Jewish scriptures , and the very idea ot it is rejected with indignation and abhorrence .
Under the law things unconsecratfcd were atoned , i . em brought into & consecrated state , by being sprinkled with the blood of ari animal victim . In the New
Testament believers in Christ are , in allusion to this rite , said to be reconciled by the blood of Christ , which is called the blood * of
sprinkling , with which belidver » are figuratively said . to be consecrated , i . e . transferred from ah unholy to a holy , from a heathen to a Christian state * In a sense
analogous to this , Christ is sitid to have died for his own sins , as well as those of the peop le ^ Heb . vii . 27 * for being of the tribe of Judah , he was not qualified to officiate as a priest , till he
Untitled Article
Mr * Belsham on " Jewish Sin-offerings . " 755
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Dec. 2, 1814, page 755, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2447/page/27/
-