On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (4)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
MISCEIirLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS,
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
education , for the habits of virtue upon which , you now justly value yourself . You might easily display your excellent talents of reasoning upon a . less hazardous subject , and thereby pbtain a rank with our most
aisti ^ pguished . authors . For among ¦ us ^ it is not necessary as among the Jdfpttentots , that a youth to be raised into the company of men should prove kis manhood by beating his mother . I would advise you therefore not to attempt unchaining the tiger , but
Untitled Article
An Examination of Mr . Hume ' s - Objection to 31 trades . MR . HUME , in his celebrated Essay , Npte K , defines a miracle ** A transgression of a law of of
i ^ ature , hy a ^ particular volition the X ) e ^ y * Qr % the interposition of an Invisible Agent . " This Essay , to use his own . wards ., is designed to show •* : ^ ha ^ t nq testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle , unless the testimony
he o £ such a kind , that its falsehood Would be more miraculous , than the fact which it endeavours to establish : and even , in . that case , there is a mutual destruction of arguments , and the superior only gives us an assurance suitable to that degree of force which
remains after deducting the inferior . " In the above quotation , Mr . Hume assumes the utter incapacity of testimony to prqve a miracle . That the assumption , is spacious , will not be denied :
ajaq unhappily , considerable numbers Jiaye heen imposed upon by it . In Eejtlity , however , a more gratuitous one * jba , th iKjver been , made , as will be fully . exemplified by an , investigation of the jjrpunds upon Which he has attempted e tp aefena it . T ^ ie corner-stone of his ^ uildi ^ ng is another assumption of a still . Wore extraordinary nature , but which ,
if correct , would undoubtedly silence # dl oppugn ers , namely , that a greater miracle must be wrought to prove the existence of a lesser one , * or in other words , that a miracle is the only crite-¦ ~ < r t \ . i m'K " ~~ bood his
, * *< . Jj [ , tjie f ^ i ^ of testimony HT ^ uLdl bp T&or ? miraculo us than the event ^ uch he rdiates , t t hen , and not till then , / ffii " ^ JP ^ W ^ command my belief or
Untitled Article
to burn this piece before it is seen by any other person , whereby you will save yourself a gjreat cl ^ al of mox tifrcation from the enemies it may raise against you , and perhaps a good deal of regret and repentance . If men are so wicked with religion , what would they be if without it ? I intend this ? letter itself as a proof ^ f my friendship ,, and therefore add no professions to it ; but subscribe simply your ' s , JB . FRANKLIN . ^
Untitled Article
rion by which to prove or judge of the existence of rr \ iracles . The credit due to them , it is admitted , rests entirely upon testimony $ but the specious objection to it , from the supposed incofti * potency of human testimony , is invalid , and at most a mere begging of the question . Nevertheless , it must be remembered , that the failure of £ h
ingenious sophister to prove a negative by no means establishes the converse , an affirmative . On the present occasion , therefore , it will not be irrelevant , and , perhaps , the onl y satisfactory repty to an objection of this sort , not merely to silence the negation * but also td ' aftempt upon adequate evidence to stft > - stantiate the affirmative . ( The minor
support attempted to be derived frbrn the subsequent sophisms contained in the Essay , such as tbe notion of an hypothetical array of conflicting testimonies , the want of an uniform experience , &c . &c will in due time be adverted to , but not much enlarged upon , volumes having already been ably
written , amply refuting them . ) My first and principal endeavour , then , will be to ascertain arid prove the competency of human testimony , to establish and record the existence of any fact , whether of an ordinary or extraordinary kind , even although it ts
were A transgression of a law of nature , by a particular volition of the Deity , or by the interposition of an Invisible Agent , " which is Mr . Hume ' s definition of a miracle . " The evidence , that the course of
nature has been departed from , is the very same by which we judge when it is not departed from , ana must be equally competent in both cases . ' For
Untitled Article
An Examination of' Jlfr . Hume ' s Objection to Miracles * 17
Misceiirlaneous Communications,
MISCEIirLANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS ,
Untitled Article
Vqi . rSft ' i . d
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1817, page 17, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2460/page/17/
-