On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (3)
-
Untitled Article
-
—- -. - .-v » • '- -5 • - rnmtmSe V | wifeirrVf 4 U / i'sD>ii^:;^3 « ¦ » ,- • ¦ •
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
¦ _< . «» > . . \
—- -. - .-V » • '- -5 • - Rnmtmse V | Wifeirrvf 4 U / I'Sd≫Ii^:;^3 « ¦ » ,- • ¦ •
— - -. - .-v » ' - -5 - rnmtmSe V | wifeirrVf 4 U / i ' sD > ii ^ : ;^ 3 « ¦ » ,- ¦
Untitled Article
*• Styi gjeascd , * praise , yet not # f * m 4 to > blagge . " * cjflcBB < * > ¦ < •«'
Aut . I . Unitarian Controversy in-Scotland . Discourses on the Principal Points &f .: 4 ke Socfaiicvn Controversy By Ralph - ^ fardlaw , Minister of the Gospel , ^ r ^ rlaegpw . . Lo ndon , Longman and Ga « Wo . pp . 443 .
^ ff Vindltdjtjhn of Unitarianism , in Repiy ¦ to Mr . ifVhrdfnw ' s Discourses on * tike Sv&nlari Controversy ¦ . By James ^ alfe ^ , M . A ^ London , Eaton . 6 vo .
> r r , UjnU&rianism Incapable of Vindication : . JL Reply to the JRev . James Yales ^ s ^ Fzndzmtion qf Unztarzanism * 13 y ' Italpb Wardlaw . London , Long ^ * H > an % nd Co . 8 va . pp . ' 416 . M Seqhel to" A Vindication of Unu * t 4 XWntsm , \ in Reply to Mr , Wurtkr i'lftw y s Trtsxthsei entitled * Unitarianisnt ^ capable of Vindication . ' - By the V { Author of tbe Vipdrcation . Liver ^ - -poolv- Robinsons . Eaton , Loodon . ; 8 tOi pp . 156 .
A , yjEW" years ago there was not JLJL only no religious society in Scotland in which \ mbUc _ wqrship was conducted < xf \ IJnitarian principles , but tJ ^ ere was scarcely , it is said , an a \! OW # d Unitarian in that country . VPien a chapel w ^ s erected in Gla&-ffliw * dedicated to the worship of One
God the ^ athef , the worshippers of a . ' ^ uij apq ^ OoA" were alarmed , ; the kir ^ s arid cjiapela resopndeii with . in « v ^ ciiv ^ s against heresies and heret ics ai \( J ^> l as ^ herales and blasphemers ^ ^ ri ^ j ^ wh ^ ti Jth e heretic who opejaed the cjiapel ^ published hi ? sermon , conthe
t 4 i ^ jng a ^ stiilctrient of Unitarian cfo $ ^ vi | je , f the iaithful of all denomi * na | jo ^ s were extpeu > e ly spandalized . Ttj ^ ey were in ^ Ugnant thai " the lead ^ ici j * cjoyCtriqes of Christiamty were p fJIlI ^ y ixyj pifgnec } " and denied ,, " 1 $ . being always taKen for granted , by those ad
person ^ , . that the ^ Re ing dpptcines of O ^ rtjiianit ^ arid ^ ,. tb « - Jeaiung doetriae $ « J Tfru ^^ napj ^ rn , aord Calviais ^ iji are dif ^ eren ^ expressions for the same tH ? ng . . "tj&ft . ^ V ^ and / a ^ in . jparticulfvrr wJho ti tne fnhnster * of a Oissenliog
Untitled Article
congregation ' in Gl ^ sgqur , ftlr ^ W $ spirit , sUrrcxi vyifchip him ; and 1 having had frorn an entirely different caule , his thoughts directed towards trM principal points of the Socknkcpi cori * troversy * and at this 3 very Urtie ,
re-Yolving various subjects for a series of Monthly Sajbbath jEveoittg'I > iscourses , h ^ e thought it would be a crimina ) dereliction of duty , to neglect this opportunity of extirpatings root aiid branch , the horrid heresy ^ vhich was
beginning to grow up amongst them ;' especially as it is not consistent with the laws aod customs of Britain , in the present age , to pull idown the chapels of heretics as soon as they are
erected , or to burn then * and uieir temples together , with fires kin&lfctf by their o > vn booLs . A ^ as I thkt * th ^ gopd ^ Bi ^ h op * of St . David's ttfnd th ^ Very Reyerend . the Dean of C © rlc showld have so much occasion id lament , that they arc a& persons ) & > r&
out of diieitinift 4 . ¦ < . . * -jc . . ; .-- : > .,: Mr- Ward law ^ cord m ' ^ f d » lire * eft a series * of Monthly S ^ 1 lbanBEi « fnin ^ Discourses ,, . on the principal poini ^ of the Socipian controvejsyj .-w ^ ii ^ h were afterwards published ; inansrwer to which , JVlr , Yates wrote his Vihdication of Unitarianism . After a considerable refreshment from the
battle-Mf - Wardla ^ v - again eom € 9 forward , defiance on bis brow ^ brandishing his arms with 4 more terrible Tury and determined to prove , or perisfe m tho aiteaipfc , that Unitarian ism is-Jp da pab \ e of Vindication . Mr . Yafcea oafrnl y ^ marches out to meet his irritated an * tagonist , and his own account * of tli ^ result is told very simpl y an < i briefly in the Sequel to the Vindication .
Such is the history of this- contra * versy . The important question wh « N ther tt be the duty of Christians to worship One God the Father , or ** One Gecl in Trinity , arwl Trinity in Unity ,. neither confounding the persons noiri dividing the substance , ** is- here -do-f *
bated with great ability . The leading arguments on each side at © - acutely ; seated ai * d forcibly urged , and thesai volumes , which are of a moderator 1 ^ 1 k , affard apy person who-wilU take the trouble to peruse them with
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), May 2, 1817, page 292, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2464/page/36/
-