On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
He embraced Christianity about a hundred years after the death of our Lord . It appears probable that he very much contributed to establish the subsequent doctrine of the 'Trinity among Christians , by applying the Platonic notion of the Logos to Jesus
Christ . Plato maintained , that " there is only One Supreme , Spiritual and Invisible God , whom he calls the Being , the very Being , the Father and Cause of all beings . He placed under this Supreme God , an inferior Being whom he called Reason , ( Aoyo $ ) the Director of things present and
future , the Creator of the Universe . In fine , he acknowledged a third Being , whom he calls the Spirit or Soul of the world . He added , that the first was the Father of the second , and that the second bad produced the third . "—Le Clerc ' s Lives of the Primitive Fathers , p . 68 . English Ed .
The application of the Logos of Plato to Jesus Christ , Justin deemed a wonderful discovery , which he thought himself inspired by heaven to make ; and whenever a person feels an impression of his being taught any peculiar tenet by immediate Divine
communication , ( though in reality it be the offspring of his warm imagination ) the voice of sober reason and the plainest declarations of Scripture are disregarded by the pious enthusiast . As one false step generally leads to another , so this error of Justin , from the pure doctrine of Christ and his
apostles , not only by degrees spread in the -Christian world , but also gained great additions to it , till at length it led the human mind into the labyrinth of incomprehensible mysteries , as they afterwards appeared in established creeds . The sentiment respecting the person of our Lord , advanced by Justin , does not seem to have extended
very rapidly , or to have gained ground "without opposition . " All the learned Christians of that time ( says a late venerable divine , who made a noble aacrifice of his worldly interest to his iategrity ) , were far from favouring
Justin-s new doctrine of Christ being a second God , spoken of in the Hebrew Scriptures . Many , whose names are recorded , with numberless others unknown , continued to hold him to be a human being , with extraordinary power * from God . And it has been
Untitled Article
amply proved , that whilst Justin and the philosophic Christiaus after him , indulged themselves in their unscriptural speculations concerning the Logos , the Word , as the Son of God before all time , and his eternal gene ration , ordinary Christians of plain understanding kept close to the doctrine
of the apostles concerning Christ , as being a man of the Jewish nation , and the Son of God in no other sense , than that of having received his being , and extraordinary favours and communications from God . * —Lindsey ' s Second Address to the Students of Oxford and Cambridge , Note to p . 213 .
Dr . Priestley has thrown much light on ecclesiastical history , by proving from the writings of the primitive fathers themselves of the second and third centuries , that their opinions respecting the person of Christ are no criterion of the sentiments of the
Christian church within that period , if thereby be meant the general body of professing Christians : With reference to these , Tertullian , the first of the Latin fathers , who flourished
about the beginning of the third century , sadly complains that " the simple , the ignorant and unlearned , who are always the greater part of the body of Christians , " cannot enter into his
sublime speculations respecting the ceconomy . ** They therefore will have it , that we are worshipers of two , and even of three Gods , but that they are the worshipers of one God only . * — Priestley ' s History of the Chi-istian Church . I . p . 285 .
This evinces the difficulty which the speculative and philosophic teachers among professing Christians had , to induce the general body to renounce the plain intelligible doctrine taught by our Lord and his apostles , of the
supremacy of the Father , and that Jesus Christ was a man possessed indeed of extraordinary divine communications , " the spirit being given him without measure , whereby he was qualified to reveal the will of God , and to be an all-sufficient Saviour .
Greatly as they revered , and ardently as they loved their professed Master , their minds revolted at the representation of his deity , as interfering with the prerogative of the only true God . They were unable to enter into those metaphysical distinctions and subtle-
Untitled Article
Mr . Howe on the Opinions , on the Trinity . 52
Untitled Article
Tor . xii . * x
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Sept. 2, 1817, page 521, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2468/page/9/
-