On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
the evidence ; be knew no other criterion of hisr being a Quaker than that of his own profession . But does every judge and every magistrate so interpret the law of the Jand , with regard to the people called Quakers ? I meddle not with the
TJnitas JRratrum , or people called Moravians , who also are favoured , in their religious scruples , against the taking of an oath . I knew an Ex-quaker in Dublin
subpoenaed as an evidence ; the counsellor , Curran , ( what is it that counsellors may not be feed to do ?) called out in court , " Hand him the book . " ** I am a Quaker—cannot take an oath . "
" You a Quaker , Sir ! Pray do you attend their meetings of discipline ?" ** No . " " Do they receive your collections > " " No , " «« What were you disowned for ? " " I have no objection to tell that . I married my wife without consulting my friends . " iC My Lord ! here is a man whom the Quakers have
turned out for a breach of their laws , and yet he claims the privilege of giving only his affirmation as a Quaker . " " I appeal to the court , " said the Quaker , tc I avow myself not in membership with the society of Friends , but hold myself liable to all the pains and penalties incurred by taking a false oath , if I affirm what is untrue . " " Let his affirmation be
taken , " said the judge . Being once subpoenaed myself , in that city , I took the Act of Parliament in that behalf in my pocket , Jn Ireland it is required that such evidence shall solemnly , sincerely and truly declare , that he is and has been of the
profession of the people called Quakers for a year and a day : 1 proposed to myself to make the declaration ; but was not called upon for my testimony . But it has happened to me since , in this city , that on a trial which was to determine ( the decision by show of
hands ) on some points of professional competency , consequently on my bread , on the whole shape , probably , of my future life , one of the company called a public friend ( Quaker speaker ) , a man skilled in the law , publicly declared I was no Quaker , whereby the number of hands in mv favour was
diminished ; though still , happily for me ( unheard ) , constituting the majority . Acknowledged in his society as a minister , I hold him as completely
Untitled Article
ordained as any minister of Oxford , or Geneva - , as fully consecrated as the Pontiff of Rome . I will say more : though I acknowledge not any man to be the Reverend ; yet , I acknowledge it would be a breach of charity to
assert that I may not sometimes have had reason to believe him the reverent Richard Phillips . I mean on the occasions of his changing his attitude and uncovering his head , on his letting his voice be heard aloud in meeting . Now , if an acknowledged minister of the Quakers of London could make so
public a declaratiop that I was no Quaker , while /„ mistaken man , in different countries abroad , on being interrogated on the subject of my Quakerian peculiarities , have always declared myself a Quaker , what might I not expect from the forensic acumen
of the gentlemen of the long robe at Westminster Hall ? Being lately subpcenaed to the Court of King ' s Bench , there , as an evidence on behalf of the Defendant , I had intended appealing , in limine , to the judge , on the validity of my evidence , and to have utterly withholden it , if he withheld his
explanation , as completely as if his decision had accorded with the notions of Richard Phillips , and not with those of Lord Mansfield , or of his brother on the Bench in Ireland . The Plaintiffs , however , withdrew the cause , and my evidence was consequently not required .
Will , then , any of thy readers , Quaker or other , inform me what is the law in the case of gi \ ing evidence , of a man professing himself a Quaker , but not being formally in any religious society of his fellow-professors ? I am apprehensive the question will not be
easily answered . In the answers I have yet obtained from Friends , I cannot come at any certainty ; and , in thus soliciting further information , I will suppose , by way of illustration , a case of considerable complexity , or of the greatest difficulty .
The legitimate children of the members of the society of Friends are , in later timers , members by inheritance . It is not necessary for them to make any confession of faith whatever . A
young couple in this city lately sent in their resignation , as members of the society , on behalf of themselves and their children . The meeting received the resignation of the parents , bufc
Untitled Article
5 S 6 Dr . Walker on the Affirmation of the Quakers .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1817, page 586, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2469/page/14/
-