On this page
-
Text (1)
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
fant daughter of the Duchess of Berri , ) when even in our own body is found a writer to set up the strange notion of the propriety of infant sprinkling as a Christian rite , derived from the apostles . The true Christian will not , however , be led away by such strange
fancies : he will consider what baptism really was , and that it could not be introduced till the parties were prepared to be disciples . Marke disciples was the precept ; the initiatory rite was the consequence : and how a disciple is to be made of a babe who cannot
assent to any proposition , it is in vain for any learned Rabbmism to attempt to explain . We must not set the plain terms of a law aside to bring it within the pale of tradition . For , had the tradition been well-grounded , and we believe that there is no foundation
for it , this would no more justify the practice than it would justify Peter ' s error which was by Paul so justly condemned . "
Upon this precious morceau of theological lore , which , in the estimation of the writer and perhaps of the 01 rtoWoi with whom confidence of assertion and a contemptuous sneer supply the place of proof , is regarded as a decisive answer to a late Plea
fqr Infant Baptism , I beg leave to offer the following animadversions . In the first place , this political Christian , or Christian Politician , professes to soften the severity of his censure upon the Romish error of baptismal salvation out of courtesy to the author of the Plea , who has asserted
the obligation of infant baptism upon totally different grounds . The author is not insensible to the intended kindness , and in return he would whisper to his gentle monitor , that another time it might be advisable just to take the pains to understand a question before he publishes his remarks upon it .
But the Christian Politioan regards infant baptism as a strange fancy . —• Perhaps he considers infant circumcision as also a strange fancy : and yet there are many true Christians who seriously believe that circumcision
was a divine institution . — Perhaps the Christian Politician may go a little further still : he may think public worship ft strange fancy : he may call the Lord ' s Supper a strange fancy : he may regard the appointment of the Lord ' s-day as * a religious and joyful
Untitled Article
commemoration of the resurrection of Christ as a strange fancy ; for these external rites , however reasonable and useful in themselves , yet as Christian , institutions , they stand upon no other foundation , nor can a better be
desired , than infant baptism , viz . ( he uniform , universal , undisputed practice of the primitive Church from the apostolic age . This the Christian Politician , by a misnomer , calls tradition , whereas it is in truth the very strongest
species of historic evidence . It is by far the surest method of tracing an institution to its original authority , infinitely better than any positive testimony from single texts which are liable to be altered and mutilated in a
thousand ways . And , in fact , it is the self-same evidence by which the records of the Christian religion are authenticated awd their genuineness is established . For how is it known
that the Gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew , and the Gospel of John by John , but from the uniform undisputed testimony of Christian antiquity : and why do the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Book of
Revelation stand upon a lower scale of credibility or rather of authenticity than the Gospels and Paul ' s Epistles : but that they are in the number of the ctviiksyc ^ svoc , books whose genuineness was not universally admitted by the earliest Christians ?
But though the rite of infant baptism stands upon this very strong ground of primitive antiquity , yet it appears that those who practise it are not true Christians in the estimation of our Christian Politician . «* The true
Christian will not , " says he , " be fed away by such strange fancies . " This , methinks , is somewhat of a sweeping censure . I have myself been pretty severely schooled for not extending — — " — - ~ - — — _ - — - ^ " ^ , -. * J 1 *_^ J& M A V ft
^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^ K indiscriminately the appellation of Unitarian to the mixed multitude , who , for one reason or another , claim the title , and who gather in such swarms around the Unitarian .
standard , that they almost remind one of the old saying , " how we app / es swim T * But never did I dream of excluding from the great community of Christians any who professed to believe in Christ , and whose lives
were correspondent to their profession , for any difference of opinion or practice relating either to Christian
Untitled Article
Mr . Belsham , on his " JRlea for Infant Baptism . 607
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1817, page 607, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2469/page/35/
-