On this page
-
Text (2)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
of the atonement by our Saviour ?—A . I believe there was such a person . Q . Do you believe then in his divine mission ?—A . I do not . Here it was observed , that it was a necessary inference from the answer , that the witness believed our Saviour
was an impostor . Mr . O'Connor denied the justice of the inference ; he s . aid he believed Christ acted up to the doctrines he professed—that he did not believe he was an impostor , but that he was rather the dupe of his own imagination .
Mr . Goold then suggested that the witness should be sworn on the Old Testament . Judge Daly—It does not necessarily follow , that , because the witness disbelieves the New Testament , he must believe in the Old . His Lordship asked the witness , whether he did believe in the Old Testament ?
Mr . O'Connor —No—not in the whole of it . Judge Daly—Do you believe the account which it gives of the divine -dispensation to the Jewish nation ? Mr . O'Connor—I do not .
Several other questions , of a similar tendency , were put to Mr . O'Connor by the Learned Counsel . Judge Daly delivered a most minute and luminous charge to the jury .
His Lordship occupied upwards of an hour and a half in recapitulating the evidence on both sides ; and referring to that of Mr . O'Connor , felt constrained to observe , that from the tendency of the doctrines which he , O'Connor , held , his disbelief in Divine
revelation , and in the mission of our Saviour , his evidence was , his Lordship would say , not altogether disentitled to credit with the jury , but he would say , it should be received by the jury with diminished credit /*
Untitled Article
Sir , Maidstone , June 6 , 1818 . ALTHOUG H a statement of the case of Mr . Charles Herbert has already appeared in the Repository , [ XII . 124 , ] and lias given rise to the liberal contributions of the friends ,
not only of Umtarianism , but of philanthrophy and humanity in general , yet it has been judged , that some additional particulars in his own language , and that of an intimate friend , ( tendered such by being made ac-
Untitled Article
. quainted with his character and treat * . ment , ) will be found interesting . » They will exhibit a mind of no ordinary worth and energy , struggling
with a spirit of persecution , which affords convincing evidence , that an age and country of boasted light and liberty is not without a specimen of intolerance in her genuine features ; and since the venom of her bite is
still most severely felt by her guileless victim , notwithstanding every effort to overcome difficulties almost insuperable , in endeavouring to establish a school adequate to lhe support of his very numerous family , it is hoped , that his case will still excite a sympathizing interest ; and particularly that
as his excellencies as a man and as a teacher of youth , have received the most satisfactory recommendations from those who are fully competent to judge of them , that it # ill be the means of engaging an attention to the Advertisement which will appear with this Number ,
" When , " says Mr . Herbert , « I was elected to the school in 1806 , not one of the trustees mentioned that there was a will of the donor which required my belief of the Athanasian
Creed and of the doctrine of Original Sin , which , if I had been made acquainted with , I have no hesitation in declaring , in the most solemn manner * that I should have wholly declined
the office . " He had , indeed , given up the appointment after his election , and it was only in consequence of the express desire and recommendation of one of the trustees , that he at last accepted it . Mr . H . * s Original Sin consisted in a manly independence of
mind ; in a disposition to think for himself , a disposition which , in whatever manner it appeared , was abhorrent from the spirit of the officiating curate . He declined teaching his own children the Church Catechism by
rote ; he was guilty of some innovations in his method of tuition , and in the simplicity of his heart he observed , in conversation with a neighbour , that 44 all wickedness is acquired , * crimes for which no reasons that he
could allege , no advantages , however satisfactorily proved , attending his new method , and no adherence to the requisitions of the donor , which he strictly observed in the education of the charity children , could in any Oe-
Untitled Article
4 ft 4 Case of Mr . Charles Herbert .
-
-
Citation
-
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), July 2, 1818, page 444, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2478/page/36/
-