On this page

• Text (2)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    spetxh . Wfeat Maees meAm , We baste no m&a » &f knowing hnt from ike litn ^ ua ^ e fee has used ; > and it is ^ erttih that he hue not gj&ea < the s % hteat intiinaJion tfaa * thie tempter waa saaae

    sirpeiior being concealed « fitor the forra of a , s « rpeti £ . Tine teraB Satmn is a mere Hebrew * rord , and signifies an adversary * an eneHay , or accuser : the fir ** time it occurs in the S&bie is 1 Oteoan , xxL 1 , where he is said

    to tempt Darid to number the people ; the second and third times are in tise book of J « b £ the / Wr / A time is Psalm cix . 6 , where the eneoaies df tkat prince are represented as saying * €€ Set thou a wicked man over him * and let

    Satan" { an adversary ) * ' stand at his right hemdf The only remaining places in which this word occurs in the Old Testament are in the first and « ee © ad verses of the third chapter of the prophocy of Zedhariah * < The late

    period in which this ward was used among the Jews , is ; an ai ^ ument against the book of Job being written by Moses ; ajad , m connexion with the manner m which it occurs in the prophecy of Zeebariah , wfeieh woa delLvered after t ^ be re turn of the Jews to

    their own laaad , a , pre $ uiaiptive ai ^ u ^ n ent that the s aid < bocik was not written before the Babylon ^ h capti vity , and as it made a part of Ezra ' s canon , the most probable supposition is , that it was produced during that period- ¦

    It is , however , iweiy posfiibLe , thai the introductory uwl concluding chapters may tewe been added l > y tsome writer ^ * oon after the relura from thtt Babyloniah caplwifiy , nor duiiag it * tontiiiujaice ; 4 U 3 td that all the vest of this venerable poeai may be as 4 > kl , iM

    or evett al < ter ibaa jrfifia ^ e ^ ofosa * . I am not sxi ^^ ienii ^ d ^ quamtftd ivitii the writing * of i \ mrmA Jews to know if any of them hsai » e ftdciptesi / tlwa t * pinion . If yctti ; ahouid m * erto tths ^ m ikxmef

    tlion ^ btf m your waUtable wonk , pertap * Bomei of < yo % ur con ^ spoadwts will ^ ndearour ! to itoow Bo a > e H ^ bft upon the siri ] Jec ^ n ^« boii 4 d itlmti he the i ^ ase it will 3 > e mrf aoceptoftteto iif i £ . BiiJTiiHJ ^ Ri

    Untitled Article

    fW < ft ^ mh ^ ff J Mfhan J ^ 9 ^ . * ! 1

    Untitled Article

    ^ vm ^^ BB ^^ " ^"'' * ' ' ¦ # ¦ ' ' ¦ * . ^** , ¦ ;¦* ' ' , -i * . ; ¦< ¦ ¦ . < < ; . t f * ¦ A LT » CIUiiH I Aittk ( Wtibh wowr ^ L owareiipjondewt . ( K ^ ¥ ii & » fi ^ o 99 , ) that such questions as tta ! sfi ;; fif liberty and Ncowity are not very

    Untitled Article

    propesr fi « r a pa ^ ulw trork ^ i ipNil * diswd f wtb year peninittion , 'vcNlyg ^ gwt a aic ^ e cof defttidfaff the f&e&hfta jof tkum ^ n « giancy ^ f wMen > ^ if > ino ^ ksofl ^ elusive , is perhaps no * wfeott ? ahswii * L J thkik it ttwty be admitted r tbttT th ^ doctrine of Necessity should not 1 » e affirmed , eiceeiM : its troth ^ oirid '^ be mode absolutely co-tain ; i > ecaaise > 4 t will ^ hardly Ire denied , ^ 3 ak $ bad «©«* sequences mo ^ f be the resuit « rf dt » adiiiission . It is pfatk ^ c ^ otrar ^ to . the l ^ ceiyed opJtnion ^ of mankindpatyd to those opinions which , i thinly tove been tine , basis of the belief of jfll

    ^ nankmd a ture st » te . The ^ bpsolution of the body of a man was as obvioits to the seases of ail men in ^ 1 ages 9 as it is to us now ; and them could appear tobeao sensible dh % r ence between suck a dissolution ^ and that of the body of any other anjmftL Mow came it then , tkat an xmaveiv

    « al belief pervaded ail nations , ages , £ o © # ues aad people , that for matt , and man onl y > there would beafcitui ^ state ? Only , I think , because man was supposed to be the master of ios own actioBia , and tkat \ && condlust ; whether g-ood or fead , ivas t&e residt of avoidable d ^ te ntUBatooBS , Nwr ;

    the belief of all fodnkind , ^ aimoevnimr subjects of their otem GomeiousmesB + iM surely entitled to most wei # l * iytCDrai derartioa . Itisisi vain to eoarpare tlu £ opinion to . that & £ men ooitGerritBg tbe ripiHg- ^ aettiog ^ and luotioo e # > lAie 6 Uti aimee that j > oti € m applie * ng ^ t <^ cooeeiousness , anii is a skailar ^ rannr

    to that m u tnsui wh& thinks me Area move when he is aw ling dowja a ffii « r , If k slfc 0 aa > W kerettiLer . i > e < fe < a * vered that food does not nourish an&fip 1 stoil thea jthmk that ;» | mtadl « lm « si is fcrund ^ for men h&v& adamfB hslifincd ttot food ttoujrishas ; them ; and « Rbw |

    they are found to have errefi it » Aim > 2 \ vill admit tiuit they may iiftiw ^ Kjed kt t < hetr iK » taoou « < rf lil * ertyv < rf ^ wW « fe tiusy lisfcve ever i&afugltf d ^ msdhpeB a « ai 9 Gdotts > fia ^ riiiig » aade $ hatoR > im i » arks , I qatraeeed ito s ^ te ^ hcr ^ Krayriit ^? hieh I tbtok the fmrtdom ^ rf iiamMi

    u ^ ttney ^ © iwy ^ te ^ & ^ dcd ^^ aqitt teoiv « u ^ in m iiad ^ ttotJjliiink ilT ^ v ^ aaodidil 4 ^> »« c& a * qttcsti ^ , to drad «» A >^ tel { pr ^ babiUiMrsvocat ^ lim iside ^ ttkcMdhi ^ tbe wet ( mly wkh > eem&ft * ti 6 m awtibmmtktit flid ^ ftem ^ KQ ionfctdeyatioo of ytapfe-J ^ teeottdeqo ^ iiQes . i * ( <( ; <• .-. ,- i rsw *« . > JUutan la x-ancersatttt ri >«^ mtfQi

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1822, page 11, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2508/page/11/