On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    4 elli ^ entia SdWtttalfe ; ahd the Liber 0 t&t ^ mi ^ fm ^ m ^ e ter df Basil , !^ 1 , ^ # ^ r fbl l ^ Sg ^ as-< mge : 4 " « n JifcnM ^ fi ^ fstWtf T 1 " 68 sftrrt crtii ffe ^ titittbriitrtB Aiaiilt iii Ccelo , ftrter , VerMni , et S p fiittis "Si , et tres stot mii testfrnoniuin \ d&ht in terfft ,

    Spiriras , a < jua et sVLtsgms ; " and this reading has beetr found ih titfo M $ S . Two other ^ ditiiShes ^ piindpes , however , exhibit' the ^ rkss ^ gc as follows ' : "In Joanhfs Epikol ^ t Ttik sufat qtue tesrtimoifiutn perhibent , aqua , stinguis et spifitus /* aiid tHat is all . THe

    questioii then ik , which bf these reading * rs genuine . If tKis were not a qn ^ stion * of tKeoiogibul criticisra , we bdieve' no critic would hesitate td pffefer ¦ thte shoiiteif feading - y since it i ^ very explicatile ht > w a transcriber should be led - to ^ ltfer the text of Euchmu ^ to cottfcrrmity ^ with tHe

    Vulgate , but tt > corrett it according to the Greek was a thing which would neve * enter iiito my oh& $ mind iu tho ^ e agnfes . ' 2 tb& here the metier m ^ ht b ^ left . ' * But it has been argued by Uatfdiierv Pbrson , and others ,

    from a passage in tWe X ^ iigestiones , that the shoi-ter reading ;* itnist be the tPtie one , and it is h 6 r <^ that the Bishop thinks hie hair fbiirtd them all in error . The passage is'this ^ "Ifatferrog . Item in Epistolft suS Johnnies ponit :

    Tria aunt quie t ^ stinddirium per ^ ibent , aqua , san ^ ifts et s ^ iritus : (^ id in hoc indicatur ? Resp . Simile huic loco etiam ilhid mitii Videtur , qfu 6 d ! ip § e in Evangellior &x 6 d 6 p ^ SioneClnilti loquitur dicens ^ unus miHtun * lance t luttls ejtis apewit et tfftntlnttb exivU

    sangms et aqua '; et qvA yBk testi-^ onium peA ) buit ! / " kT . « oO 6 i « i fcse de ' Jesu stfpra dixli ^ t : tacMatoTca P « t ? tradiaiV ^ pfmtM . cmM . ergo ta

    nrem sangttis vjAgWihdib ^ fekV-• yritmr , spiHtTia ' vef 5 ' IfeSl ' W but transit - a * £ fl&Hlft * fffc Wtti We B 3 aftl itiM ^|^ 8 «| % t « & ^ telhtuntTrtffit ^ &Me . ^ M ^ hVPel ta ^ ni tb tft' WtfW , l » < # ff 6 r i »«« ot her * 1 mv « ^ ftiftd , ^ t Euche-

    Untitled Article

    for an t '^ wa ^ m WS ^ mmmliteml ' one in the 8 t # « "' tti ' , . ^ ^^ fess . ttiat \ vfe a § 6 ^ j ^ rat Sa ^ ffittl w ^ tdSSBt

    their reasoniog . Had Eucheritis bfceri aiguingr in fevoixr t >* j ^^ ffl ^«»|« had he passed over the seventh Ve * se to allegorize the eighth , as many fitffe done , the argument tliat he ^ c 6 uW not ha ^ e had : the seventh in his Bible

    would have been decisive ^ btit we ^ no reason why the same man , in thfe abundance of liis zeal to eic ^ aet- ime Trinity , per / as et nefit&f frfrisi ev ^ ty part or Stxipttoei miglHf not allegorize tlie eighth verse as ^ wdl ^ s ajiply the seventh . Bishop Bfcrgess ; Sew ^ ever , assails tlietn' on a different

    ground , and maintains that they haVfc misunderstood Eucherius , vvht ) , as t {^ says , enumerates three © piaioiis ^ te ^ own , ' * mihi vidctur ^ that of th ^ TO wtia explained the water of baptisua ; &C-, ** quidam . ergo e ! x hoe ioeo ^ fcfeputant ?* and tHat of the inadoritfer

    • ' IMures tamen /* But wtjtfld ; ^ y man , writing in Latin , and intending to oppose h ^ s owrt opinioo ^ nd thatf of certain others , have s&dd , ** mibi vid ^ ttir /* " miidam erg * cKftfmfeffl *^ Ergo is suiwjr nd afdv ^ t ^ atfre ^ pai ^^ cle '; ha 4 he meant wtiatrthe Bis&ep supposes , he woirfd hatre s ^ &fcpud&iii * ^ O 7 w ^ 72 ^ -plures veto . ' * tte fodtis , that the only opposition Is between : * tlte

    second ainl the tftiw- otoihions . He ? first explains the . water ; &c ; eottecf&y scad historically of the de&tlr of Ghrfee , and then goes on to meiitioh Ivtrft kinds of spiritual appHcutlon $ bdMfce& from it , andthfese he oppgrsfes tt > e ^ eh " other by quidam and pfoitfetfttiin&rr : ' Pofson concluded ftotrt the fetoottr '

    whWh he Jha 3 bestowed ttpotf % Hfc * second , which applies :- it to itlfe ' !^" nity , that it ^ iras to this he hitytli&if iiiiluij ^ d , aad there is ' -ptirfiAtift . ribthiagM the words \ vhic * # tilMi ^ tM ^ t > itWsn 6 t . 4 * :

    ^ Itt alin ing ttee ^ fftfe ^ ri ^ did not ' ' 8 | p | dy the eighty ^ ra ^ int ^ ti ^ Wj tothte ^ rinity , ^(^^ dt ^* l 8 ^ bp cast liis eyes * oi ^ tl | lil ^ ^ iiil ^ ' ^^| te We ioDe he wilt ; itf * m * & > tMeWlii ^ riun ^ iviewer «^^;; this p ^ s ^ is most iumwiii ^ Bi ^ t ^^^ E ^ W of £ » H ^^ rW shop entleavottrs to shew , against

    Untitled Article

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Jan. 2, 1822, page 45, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2508/page/45/