On this page

• Text (1)

  Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

  • 

    Untitled Article

• Transcript

  • Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.

    Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.

    Untitled Article

    ltelit " &c . &c . Dr . Smith ' s quotation ' from the Refuge itself is not much more fascinating than these vindictive representations . Is there nothing apparently of a dangerous tendency in that paragraph , which places the most hardened sinner and the most virtuous saint on a perfect level in the sight of God ?

    Dr . Smith ' s defence of some of his friends by name is pitiably lame . He would better have let them alone-Why devote separate sections in such a formal manner to ' * ( 1 . ) M . Em ~ pmjtaz , " to "( 4 . ) Henry

    Drumntond , Esq . " and to others , if , after talking and conjecturing about and al ) out them , he leaves them just where tliey were found under the load of M . Chenevikre ' s charges ? This is a poor way of backing , one ' s

    friends-In p . 470 , where Dr . Smith quotes a sentence from M- Cheneviere , on the insufficiency of good works to procure salvation , is a striking instance how nearly the most opposite

    sects approach each other , and how easily they might agree in general speculative principles and their consequent results , if sectarian jealousy and alarm did not interfere to drive

    them widely asunder . " The substitute for despised Calvinism has proved its insufficiency to stem the torrent of moral corruption . " First , we have a right to suspect in some of this moral corruption , a legitimate consequence of the ancient unnatural Calvinism . Second , the

    substitute for despised Calvinism , if not able to stem the existent torrent of corruption , may have prevented it from merging more than it has into the broad and overwhelming * flood with which other parts of the continent have heen deluged . Third , what perplexing i 7 iconsistency the above proposition introduces into the circle of Dr . Smith's own ideas 1 Uiritarianism he all along represents a $ the identical instrument by which

    this torrent of moral corruption was necessarily and naturally let in upon Geneva . Of course , how could it , ^ 'hik letting- in the torrent , have any sufficiency to stem the self-same flood ?

    Oa the whole , it 13 not to be regretted , that this buz has been excited about the Geneveae Unitarians . we cannot doubt that it will do them

    Untitled Article

    good . It is a most blessed thing in this world to fee able to count a few enemies , and to have one ' s pure mind stirred up , not only by way of remembrance , but by way of

    annoyance . I hope that Calvinists and Trinitarians will never let us quite alone on this side of the grave . We are so good-natured , we have so much confidence in the great purposes of Providence , we have so much reliance

    on the better things in human nature , we have seen such deplorable effects from over-heated zeal , that perhaps our tendencies lie too much towards coldness and apathy . The late efforts of meddling- travellers at Geneva , so far from giving Orthodoxy a large and 1

    firm footingthere , will only cause Unitarianisrn in that and perhaps other quarters to look to itself , to repair some possible defects , which long security may have suffered to steal in , and ere long to shine forth with renovated beauty , excellence , and

    power . Corrector , on Mr . fForsleyy must be answered by that gentleman himself . Review . Ben David ' s Reply . The Reviewer questions the policy of Dr . Jones ' s ({ fearless avowal of

    Unitarianism . " At this I humbly demur . In the first place , Dr . Jones ' s Unitarianism is so completely interwoven into all his views and speculations ,

    that how could he help avowing- it , in a work of this kind , even had he attempted its concealment ? Next , there is some " good policy" in contributing such additional reputation to the cause of Unitarian ism as works of

    this description are adapted to effect . And lastly , if there be any strength ia the arguments advanced by Dr . Jones in defence of Christianity , perhaps they would gain as much force of influence by coming" from the unexpected quarter of Unitarianisrn , as they would lose by their alarming connexion with it .

    If the Reviewer will carefully look over the first extract he has taken from Ben David , I think he will find nothing which will make him particularly demur to the statement quoted from p

    5 , respecting the immortality of the soul . Ben David , I presume , alludes to the popular , metaphysical dogma of the inherent , essential immortality of the soul , which our Saviour cer-

    Untitled Article

    Critical Synopsis of the Monthly Repository for August , 1824 . 463

• Citation
  • Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Aug. 2, 1825, page 463, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2539/page/11/