On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
hStr ^ iI falnow bn ^ q Y jifb | 7 l fS Sjjfc - « i a » i > WRfB ^ % ^ ydh ^ M ^ nl ^ ir fitt dpLr ^ ligiii ^^ ti ^ e 4 § , ) ^ vbb au 6 i- seribwhi ® stitf ^ ' M ^ tdtidt , ^ it&qtrt art ; ittmmrt WKIgePwMn ^ teai ^ Uhfehtf on
tkeistffeji&fct & $ VginM ! $ Wh Services , or to ejeattiitie 4 Sfty M tti 6 s& ^ tich haVe bee& ? - 'ntiftKd £ ^ kki ^ y undertakes for your readers the task of judging ; of the merits-df tlie question . ! la the absence © f « U argument * would it ndt tiave been as well to suflfer them , to
judge for themselves ? The sentence by Mm pronounced is delivered m neariy the following words : «< The objections against the continuance [ revival ] of this service appearstirifcingly feeble fey the side of those advantages which have beea triumphantlyurged in ita favour . "
. Your readers will remember the opinion of Mr . Rutt ( p . 348 ) con ^ . cerjiir ^ the merits of the question , and how strikingly modest it appears ifjpthe- ' Side ^ f this arrbgant decision . His wolrda iare , " The questioh appears to Me to be set at rest , as far
a& thme m ^ judgm ^ nit of it . " The opinion liei ^ eNl ^ f ^ ressted , evidently refers tfc&b ® merits Of the question as discti&sed to ^« he ^ tfepositorj ^—to the urgumenU ^ f the ! Writers f but our sagafcious SpebMtor ^ applies it to the 6 f im
stat ^ opinfon Htlie supjecfc , and , accordingly , hiii § teTi a fe ^ fac ts — curiou ® ^ tMWlgb in ^^ 6 ^ € ^ eCTS- ^ whi ^ h , he s a ^ s , h ^ fc ^ ettei' ^ iset the qtfestia » atvre ^^^ lilfe ^ lie ipse ^ dicctt of Mr . . Rutt . ; !" ,. " ¦ - ¦ "
lo&i \ m $ foStiki Si ^ - tfeat favourable opinion < 64 f--iftoe tHidereftihding of most of your reader ^ tfciBit ^ 1 strii coniiderit they . wttli'feW ; thi % ik a question of this ivature sealed by the facts which Spectator enumerates , even if they were a hundred times more numerous
than they are . I am sure they will not consent to have the question decided by this kind of voting , even if Spectator should again kindly come forwards to assure them that it is strikingly the best way .
It is very true that the ceremony of Ordination has fereen of late warmly recommended * ^ eiiibflly by gentlemen connected with the Manchester College , York . It is also true that in the course of the hrsta 9 fttre or six years a few services of the description in question have been celebrated almost
sports in the ^^ Qsi tpjrjf .-Jg $ tfo t fts strt&ingl y demonsW ^ i ^^ fl ^ apd wishes iti regard io ^ therp ^ Jiceu as
^ ^ « ^ % : W ^ f * ^ jjfiWBPW * - S ^ IM ^ M v ^ fWs r sion WOulu have been th £ v juffef § # ° * i £$ W ® t ®§ P * * I * l mmMm ^ ;« pr-W * " !^ M « W * »| e » ^^^ ¦^ 4 &Sr - ^ Atf » lk ? s couatea ^ t ^ c % to-, tjae jpraGtie& % md m one of tlie 6 a ^ sj 2 lu ^ , td ^
tutor , ! am quite ^ t % Jqs 3 f | f ? , 3 i ^ py ^ r \ vhat part the society can be siippQsed to have taken . Sucfi is tlie formMable pwt ^ ter of facts which , have aet tne question at
rest ! Such is | he ; terrifying « uray against us whiclj inspires Spectator vvitli such a triunaphaRt strain of boasting 1 And hence , and because some friends and acquaintance have expressed some approbatxcrti of the
revived ceremony , it is most saga * ciousiy concluded , that the feeling in favour of it is general . What a happy talent is boasting ! Well , but good Mr . Spec % to ^ is it not to be presumed , tUi ^ reh ^ ve authentic information to tlxje 0 ntr ^ , yy
that those who have neither revived , nor concurred in reviving , tliip uasprlptural ceremony , that all t ^ Q ^ e uot included in your appalling enumeration , must be ranked as yqiir opponents in this controyqrsy ? And if t ^ p Unitarian body be ndt incoiis ^ erable , indeed , in point of numbers , they
greatly outnumber your partisans . Does Spectator forget , when he : inquires us " to level our objections against the abuses of Ordinatipn , " that we declared that we view t \\ p whole as an abuse ? ( P . 283 . ) fyfcr . Baker also asserts , ( p . 346 , ) that I
ought not to mention the . abu ^ ^ of the practice , it being the part of r bigoted misrepresentation so tq $ pj when they are disclaimed by the pa-Ur ties . I do not remember to Jfiavg taxed the gentlemen , with aiiy abuse
which they disclaim , iuid ap ^ upd ^ the necessity of observing that the charge is wholly groundless . " . The prie ^ ^ iy pretensions and domii \ aj , ion 3 the . ghosj ^ r ly power and authority , " were not brought forward by me as accompaniments of the Bolton service ; I even expressly stated the contrary , that I
Mr . Johns oh the Revwdl of Ordinution Services . 591
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1825, page 591, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2541/page/15/