On this page
- Text (2)
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
pare together the prelate ' s stricture and the note ot Ne&l ' s Editor . ( 130 ) 530 . [ 489 . T . ] Warburtaft laughs at our historian for his
imagined simplicity in thinking that Oliver Cromwell , when making a certain speech , was really in doubt . Yet Warburton himself , in a former and a no less palpable instance of grimace , could receive Cromwell's words as expressing his real opinion . See No .
103 . ( 131 ) 545 . [ 503 . T . ] It is farvery far- —from being yet evident that Charles I . wrote the eucav GawriXucq . The reader should consult Dr . Toulmin ' s appropriate note , before he acquiesce in the prelate ' s censures of our historian .
( 132 ) 549 . [ 507 . T . ] This stricture is well disposed of by the liberal and candid Editor . ( 133 ) 551 . [ 508 . T . ] Warburton concurs substantially in the judgment delivered by Du flfroulin concerning the actors in the King ' s trial and execution . As to the remainder of the
prelate ' s stricture , it is far from being probable that Episcopalians and Nonconformists will soon arrive at the same inference , in respect of the party who prepared the entertainment , and was at the expense of the exhibition * The strictures of Bishop Warburton upon Neal , amount to above one
hundred and thirty , and may be classed in the following manner : 1 st , those which profess to impugn the historian ' s veracity ; 2 dly , those which regard the nature of the facts and
opinions that he records ; 3 dly , those which are directed against his judgment of men and things ; and 4 thly , those which in any degree or shape affect his reputation for integrity and fair dealing .
I . He who takes the pains of reckoning the number of the first class of objections , will find it to be extremely small . It is not without the greatest difficulty that I can discover eighteen , which even accuse Neal of falsifying the truth of history : nor in a single instance is the charge substantiated .
II . A large proportion of the notes —not fewer than sixty—concern the quality of certain facts and sentiments which Neal records , and which are found either in documents of public
riotoriety , or in works referred to in . his mjargin . By this 9 et of objections the historian ' s probity cannot be invalidated : how completely they fail of bringing his understanding into question , let those determine who have carefully perused the edition of his History by Dr . Toulrain .
III . Many of Warburton ' s strictures fall under the third division : they are levelled at the judgment which Neal pronounces or intimates on men and things . It was to be supposed that the historian and his censor would
usually differ from each other in their estimate of both . A dignitary of the Church of England and a Protestant Nonconformist minister were not likely to view the events and actors of
that period with precisely the same eyes . Nor am I disposed or able to say that , in point of opinion , Neal is always right or Warburton always wrong . Common justice and candour demand this admission : to readers
whom these qualities characterize I submit the matters in dispute . There remain then the very few annotations which may be thought to bear in any degree or shape on Neal's reputation for integrity and fair dealing . Now , in the retrospect , I
discover none of any importance , except No . 34 ; our historian ' s language concerning UdaPs death . Here it might be wished that he had expressed himself with more reserve : here perhaps he was insensibly led away by that excessive zeal , from the effects of
which even wise and good men are not always free ; but even here no strong or lasting censure fixes itself on his memory . Let him who is without sin , in this respect / throw the first stone . That stone , most assuredly , should not be cast by Warburton .
I must not conclude without g lancing at that prelate ' s qualifications , at NeaPs , at NeaPs Editor ' s , and at Dr . Southey ' s . Of Warburton it were presumptuous in me to say much , after the masterly portraits and sketches of him which have been delineated by Dr . Samuel Johnson * and Dr . Parr . f
* In his prefaces respectively to Shaks peare and to his own Eng . Diet . . t Traots by Warburton , &c .
Exuminati&n of fParburton , &c . 601
vol . xx . 4 h
Monthly Repository (1806-1838) and Unitarian Chronicle (1832-1833), Oct. 2, 1825, page 601, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/mruc/issues/vm2-ncseproduct2541/page/25/